Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 WINDFORCE OC 8GB GDDR5X
The Pascal-based GTX 1080 with 8GB of GDDR5X memory and a 1797MHz boost clock delivers reliable 1080p gaming, backed by a triple-fan Windforce cooler that keeps the 180W card at stable temperatures. Its 2560 CUDA cores and support for 8K displays at 60Hz offer surprising longevity for older display setups. This card is best for budget-conscious 1080p gamers upgrading from much older hardware who don't require modern AI or ray tracing features.
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The Gigabyte GTX 1080 WINDFORCE runs cool and still handles 1080p gaming fine, but it's showing its age. Thermal performance is best-in-class at 91st percentile, but user sentiment sits at just 27th percentile thanks to coil whine and buggy software. Worth it only if you're on a tight budget and need a stopgap card.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- Runs cool thanks to that triple-fan WINDFORCE cooler 92nd
- Still delivers solid 1080p frame rates in most games 78th
- 8GB of GDDR5X gives you decent headroom for older titles 74th
- Good value if you can find it at a reasonable price
Points faibles
- Coil whine is a common complaint from owners
- Gigabyte's Extreme Engine software is buggy
- No SLI bridge included in the box
- Thermal throttling reported by some users
L'avis des propriétaires
The Word on the Street
L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps
ExclusivitéD'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.
D'après 8 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.
Les preuves
Performance
The raw numbers tell a mixed story. PassMark G3D comes in at 15606, which lands it in the middle of the pack for modern GPUs. The 8GB of GDDR5X on a 256-bit bus gives you 320 GB/s of bandwidth, enough for 1080p gaming without breaking a sweat. But the 180W TDP and 16nm Pascal architecture mean you're getting less performance per watt than anything current. Thermal performance is the standout here, 91st percentile means this triple-fan cooler does real work. Compute and AI scores are weak, 27th and 31st percentile respectively, so don't expect this to handle modern AI workloads or heavy productivity tasks.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | GeForce GTX 1080 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Pascal |
| Class | consumer |
| Process | 16 |
Memory
| VRAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bus | 256 |
| Bandwidth | 320.3 |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 2560 |
| Base Clock | 1657 |
| Boost Clock | 1797 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 8.873 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 15606 |
| GPU Compute | 7627 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 180 |
| Recommended PSU | 500 |
| Power Connectors | 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Triple Fan |
| Fans | 3 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 3.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 |
Physical
| Length | 280 |
| Slot Width | 2 |
| Form Factor | ATX |
| Weight | 0.9 kg / 2.0 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | No |
| Upscaling | DLSS |
| AV1 Encode | No |
| VR Ready | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 |
| RGB | No |
vs Competition
Stacked against the XFX SPEEDSTER MERC319 RX-7800 XT or the MSI SHADOW RTX 5060 Ti, this GTX 1080 gets embarrassed. Those cards have double the VRAM, modern architectures, and actual ray tracing hardware. The ASRock OC Formula RX 6900 XT absolutely destroys it in raster performance. But here's the thing, those cards cost way more. The GTX 1080's only real advantage is price. If you can snag one for under $200 and you're still on something like a GTX 750 Ti, it's a massive upgrade. Just don't expect it to keep up with anything from the last three years.
| Spec | Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 WINDFORCE OC | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G | PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GeForce RTX 5080 |
| Vram | 8GB GDDR5X | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR7 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 1797 | 2407 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 | 2620 |
| Tdp W | 180 | 575 | 300 | 360 | 339 | 360 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 256 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 384 | 256 |
| Ray Tracing | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Connectivity | Preuve sociale | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 WINDFORCE OC | 30.7 | 32.8 | 27.2 | 33.6 | 26.4 | 42 | 91.5 | 27.3 | 43.5 | 45.8 | 78.4 | 73.6 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.6 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 86 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 80.4 | 72.9 | 94 | 88.8 | 21 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.3 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 99.4 | 57.8 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.1 | 91.7 | 83.8 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 86 | 52.7 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 17.6 |
| PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O Compare | 85.3 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 45 | 57.8 | 94 | 82.6 | 18 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
At $180 USD on the used market, this card is a gamble. That's cheap for 8GB of VRAM and a 15606 PassMark score, but you're buying into a platform that's nearly a decade old. The EUR 305 price in Europe feels steep for what you get. If you're on a tight budget and just need something to push 1080p, it's worth a look. But you're one driver update away from headaches, and the lack of modern features like proper ray tracing support means this card has an expiration date.
En savoir plus
Overview
The Gigabyte GTX 1080 WINDFORCE is a card from a different era, but it still has some fight left in it. You get 8GB of GDDR5X, 2560 CUDA cores, and a 1797MHz boost clock in a triple-fan package that runs surprisingly cool. It's not going to impress anyone in 2025, but for the right price it's a solid 1080p workhorse.
Our database puts its thermal performance in the 91st percentile, which is genuinely impressive for a card this old. The catch is everything else. Raster performance sits at 34th percentile, VRAM at 27th, and user sentiment at 27th. Owners love the value and the cool temps, but coil whine and Gigabyte's janky Extreme Engine software keep popping up as complaints.
Common Questions
Q: Will this card work on a PCIe 2.0 motherboard?
Yes, PCIe 3.0 is backwards compatible with 2.0. You'll just be limited to PCIe 2.0 speeds, which for this card won't make a huge difference in real-world gaming.
Q: Does this card support SLI?
It has the SLI connectors, but Gigabyte doesn't include an SLI bridge in the box. You'd need to buy one separately if you want to run two of these together.
Q: Is this a good upgrade from a GTX 750 Ti?
Absolutely. You're looking at roughly triple the performance in most games. Just make sure your power supply can handle the 180W TDP and has an 8-pin connector.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need anything beyond 1080p gaming or want modern features like ray tracing and DLSS. The 8GB of VRAM is already tight for newer titles, and the AI and compute scores are near the bottom of our database. If you're planning to keep your GPU for more than a year or two, spend the extra money on something current. Also skip it if you're sensitive to coil whine, multiple owners report it's a real issue on this model.
Verdict
This card is for budget builders who need something now and can't stretch to a modern GPU. If you're still rocking a GTX 750 Ti or similar, this is a huge leap forward. The cool temps and decent 1080p performance make it a reasonable stopgap. But if you have any flexibility in your budget, save up for something newer. The coil whine, software issues, and aging architecture mean this is a short-term solution, not a long-term investment.
Usage Scores
- Global43.1
- AI/LLM22.1
- Budget72.1
- Gaming 4k27.9
- Ray Tracing38.8
- Workstation34.5
- Gaming 1080p48.1
- Gaming 1440p43
- Content Creation31.3