Nikon Z fc Silver

★★★★★ 4.7 (48)

Son capteur CMOS DX de 20,9 MP et son autofocus à 427 points avec détection des yeux offrent une qualité d'image nette pour les photos et la 4K à 30fps, le tout dans un boîtier de 397g stabilisé sur 5 axes. Son design classique et tactile, associé à l'écran orientable pour le vlog, en fait un appareil au style distinctif qui ravive le plaisir de la photographie. Il est parfait pour les photographes amateurs cherchant un hybride compact à emporter partout pour la photo de rue et les portraits.

Type mirrorless
Sensor 21.5MP aps-c
AF Points 427 pts
Burst 11 fps
Video 4K @30fps
IBIS Oui
Weather Sealed Oui
Weight 397 g
Nikon Z fc Silver camera
84 Score global
Prix 0 $CA
Aucune offre disponible

Aperçu

Avantages et inconvénients

Points forts

  • Strong connectivity (94th percentile) 94th
  • Strong battery (93rd percentile) 93rd
  • Strong build (91st percentile) 91st
  • Strong af (90th percentile) 90th

Points faibles

L'avis des propriétaires

L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps

Exclusivité

D'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.

L'avis des propriétaires est resté stable dans le temps
85/100Notre analyse IA du ressenticonfiance élevée · 49 sources · juin 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '21: 4.9★ · 16 avisQ4 '21: 4.1★ · 8 avisQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 6 avisQ2 '22: 4.7★ · 7 avisQ3 '22: 4.0★ · 3 avisQ4 '22: 4.0★ · 2 avisQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ3 '23: 4.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 1 avis1686732211111Q3 '21Q4 '21Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q1 '23Q3 '23Q4 '23Q1 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26
Note moyenneSatisfaits (4-5★)Insatisfaits (1-2★)Hauteur des barres = nombre d'avisDate estimée
  1. Q3 202265/1004.0★3 avis

    Buyers praise its cute design and nostalgic feel, but note ergonomic issues, limited manual controls, and poor image quality for some.

    • Attractive design and pleasant shooting experience, especially for enthusiasts.
    • Ergonomic problems: hard to hold, one-handed use impossible, hand cramps.
    • Lack of direct manual controls; frequent dependence on touch-screen menu.
    • Poor image quality and low resolution that limits cropping.
  2. Q2 202280/1004.7★7 avis

    Buyers love this camera's retro style and portability, but note battery life, kit lens vignetting, and slower focus in low light.

    • Enjoyable retro design, lightweight, and fun to use.
    • Kit lens vignettes when extended, image quality better with other lenses.
    • Battery life is shorter than DSLRs, requiring an extra battery.
    • Autofocus slows in low-light conditions.
  3. Q1 202294/1005.0★6 avis

    Buyers in Q1 2022 praised the Z fc for its retro design and ease of use, noting excellent image and video quality, though some recommended adding a grip for better handling.

    • Retro design with physical dials makes controls quick and fun.
    • Image and video quality (4K, colors, autofocus) are highly regarded.
    • Grip is awkward; a third-party grip is recommended for comfort.
    • 28mm lens offers good contrast but imperfect bokeh and lens flare.
  4. Q4 202171/1004.1★8 avis

    Buyers praise the retro design, autofocus, and image quality, but note flash incompatibility, limited lens choices, and lack of a grip.

    • Retro design and tactile dials are highly praised.
    • Great autofocus and image stabilization for handheld shots.
    • Incompatible with most speedlights; HSS and iTTL issues reported.
    • No grip on body; some find it comfortable, others need aftermarket parts.
  5. Q3 202196/1004.9★16 avis

    Reviewers in Q3 2021 praised the Z fc for its retro design, compact size, and joyful analog-like shooting experience. A few noted cheap-feeling plastic parts and limitations like lack of IBIS.

    • Retro aesthetic and tactile dials reminiscent of film cameras
    • Compact, lightweight, ideal for everyday carrying and travel
    • Build quality concerns: plastic battery door and faux leather feel cheap
    • Improved features over Z50: USB-C charging, flip-out screen, better autofocus

D'après 49 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.

Les preuves

Performances

Percentiles de performance

AF 90.2
EVF 87.9
Build 91.1
Burst 73.8
Video 72.7
Sensor 86.7
Battery 92.5
Display 85.4
User Sentiment 62.7
Connectivity 94.3
Preuve sociale 69.3
Stabilization 86.8

Caractéristiques techniques

Fiche technique complète

Sensor

Type 23.5 x 15.7 mm (APS-C) CMOS
Size aps-c
Megapixels 21.51 MP
ISO Range 100
Processor EXPEED 6

Autofocus

AF Points 427
AF Type Autofocus, Manual
Eye AF Yes
Animal AF Yes
Subject Detection Yes

Shooting

Burst (Mechanical) 11
Max Shutter 1/4000
Electronic Shutter Yes

Video

Max Resolution 4K
4K FPS 30
1080p FPS 120
10-bit Yes
Log Profile Yes
Codec H.264, H.265

Display & EVF

Screen Size 3"
Touchscreen Yes
Articulating Yes
EVF Resolution 2.36 M dots

Build

Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs
Battery Life 410

Connectivity

Wi-Fi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
USB USB Type-C
HDMI Micro HDMI
Hot Shoe Yes

Face à la concurrence

Spec Nikon Z fc Fujifilm X-H2S Sony a7R V Panasonic LUMIX GH7 OM System OM-1 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Type mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless
Sensor 21.5MP aps-c 26.2MP aps-c 61MP full-frame 25.2MP micro-four-thirds 20.4MP micro-four-thirds 20.4MP micro-four-thirds
AF Points 427 425 693 315 1053 121
Burst FPS 11 40 10 75 10 15
Video 4K @30fps 6K @120fps 8K @60fps 6K @120fps 4K @60fps 4K @30fps
IBIS true true true true true true
Weather Sealed true true true true true true
Weight (g) 397 579 723 721 511 580
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produit AFEVFBuildBurstVideoSensorBatteryDisplayUser SentimentConnectivityPreuve socialeStabilization
Nikon Z fc 90.287.991.173.872.786.792.585.462.794.369.386.8
Fujifilm X-H2S Compare 89.496.193.592.697.496.998.398.862.794.393.294.7
Sony a7R V Compare 94.899.196.376.49577.693.385.498.694.397.398.4
Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Compare 86.788.996.394.697.161.690.485.491.894.375.896.5
OM System OM-1 Compare 95.397.583.793.984.446.89585.491.886.482.586.8
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Compare 81.384.793.690.468.746.892.885.462.794.399.996.5

Scores par usage

Global (84.2)Video (82.6)Travel (82)Youtube (79.5)Beginner (83.6)Vlogging (81.7)Streaming (81.4)Photography (87.3)Wedding Events (85.5)Sports Wildlife (83.8)Product Photography (86)

Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.

Autres configurations3

Produits similaires