Price drop 1%

Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm

★★★★★ 4.5 (8,590)

Setting itself apart with best-in-class optical performance, the telephoto zoom uses XLD glass for high resolution and a fast, silent USD autofocus motor paired with Vibration Compensation. Its dual-format Di design provides full compatibility with both full-frame and APS-C Sony DSLRs, and at just 765 grams it’s light enough for all-day handheld shooting. Best for budget-minded Sony A-mount photographers needing a versatile, lightweight telephoto for travel and amateur sports in good lighting conditions.

Focal length 70-300mm
Aperture f/32
Mount Sony A
stabilization Yes
Weight 765 g
af type Autofocus
lens type telephoto
Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm lens
50 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Tamron 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 is a budget telephoto that delivers sharp images and solid vibration compensation for way less than first-party options. Autofocus gets sluggish in low light and the build feels cheap, but owners overwhelmingly agree it's an excellent value. If you need reach on a budget, this is the one to get.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Excellent sharpness for the price, especially in the mid zoom range 91st
  • Lightweight and portable enough for hiking and travel 81st
  • Versatile 70-300mm range works for wildlife, sports, and casual portraits 79th
  • Vibration compensation helps a lot when shooting handheld 66th

Cons

  • Autofocus hunts and slows down noticeably in low light
  • Build quality feels cheap and plasticky
  • Chromatic aberration is a real issue in high-contrast scenes
  • Soft at 300mm wide open

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.5/5 (8590 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently rave about the sharpness and overall image quality for the price, especially for wildlife and bird photography.
🤔 Several buyers mention the autofocus can hunt and struggle in low light or on small subjects, though most find it acceptable in good conditions.
👎 A recurring complaint is noticeable chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes, along with some softness at the long end wide open.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
85/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 16 sources · Jul 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '12: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '13: 3.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '14: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '14: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ4 '14: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '15: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '16: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '16: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ3 '16: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '19: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '19: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '19: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '20: 5.0★ · 1 review1112111311111Q1 '12Q4 '13Q1 '14Q2 '14Q4 '14Q3 '15Q1 '16Q2 '16Q3 '16Q2 '19Q3 '19Q4 '19Q3 '20
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews

Based on 16 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Sharpness is the headline here. Owners consistently report crisp images throughout most of the zoom range, which is impressive for a lens at this price. The 70-300mm reach makes it a natural fit for wildlife and bird photography, and the 1:2 max magnification gives you a decent pseudo-macro option for flowers and bugs. But the autofocus is a mixed bag. It's fine in good light, but it hunts and struggles on small subjects or when the sun starts to dip. Chromatic aberration shows up as purple and green fringing in high-contrast scenes, and things get a little soft at 300mm wide open. The f/4.0-5.6 aperture is also pretty slow, which means you'll be cranking ISO or reaching for a tripod more often than you'd like.

Performance Percentiles

AF 53.9
Bokeh 7.7
Build 23.2
Macro 43.6
Optical 61.7
Aperture 4.9
User Sentiment 65.5
Versatility 90.7
Social Proof 80.8
Stabilization 79.3

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Telephoto
Focal Length Min 70
Focal Length Max 300
Elements 13
Groups 9
ED Elements 2

Aperture

Max Aperture f/32
Min Aperture 4.0-5.6
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Sony A
Format full-frame
Weight 0.8 kg / 1.7 lbs
Filter Thread 62

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization Yes

Focus

Min Focus Distance 950
Max Magnification 1:2

vs Competition

Stacked against the competition, the Tamron holds its own in a very specific way. The Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 and Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 are sharper and faster, but they're completely different lenses for different jobs. The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is a closer match in spirit, but it gives up 165mm of reach. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is a better lens in almost every measurable way, but it's also a wide-angle zoom that costs significantly more. If you need 300mm on a budget, none of these competitors actually compete. The Tamron wins by default in its niche.

Spec Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Focal Length 70-300mm 18-55mm 17-40mm 12-35mm 18-135mm 28-70mm
Max Aperture f/32 f/3.5 f/1.8 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/2.8
Mount Sony A Nikon F Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds Sony E Canon RF
Stabilization true true false true true true
Weather Sealed false false true true false true
Weight (g) 765 205 535 306 326 495
AF Type Autofocus pulse stepping motor HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) Autofocus Linear motor STM
Lens Type telephoto zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Tamron SP AFA005S-700 70-300mm 53.97.723.243.661.74.965.590.780.879.3
Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Compare 84.681.283.695.354.482.665.582.886.192.3
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare 53.99766.972.396.695.398.375.794.134.4
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare 53.986.683.748.986.188.292.180.486.196.4
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 97.781.270.837.37882.647.795.890.779.3
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare 84.686.670.341.583.988.287.376.953.498.4

Price

Value & Pricing

This is where the Tamron absolutely cleans up. At around $449 USD, you're getting a lens that owners repeatedly describe as punching way above its weight class. The value-for-money sentiment in our data is overwhelmingly positive, and it's easy to see why. You get sharp images, a useful zoom range, and vibration compensation for a fraction of what a first-party 70-300mm costs. If you're on a budget and want reach without selling a kidney, this is one of the easiest recommendations in the telephoto category.

From CA$670 1 offer across 1 retailer
Amazon 1 offer From CA$670

Price History

CA$600 CA$800 CA$1,000 CA$1,200 CA$1,400 CA$1,600 May 9Jul 18Sep 8Oct 25 CA$670

Read more

Overview

The Tamron 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 is one of those lenses that makes you wonder why you'd ever pay three times more for a first-party option. It's a budget telephoto zoom that covers a genuinely useful range, and owners seem to love it for exactly that reason. Sharp enough, light enough, and cheap enough to just throw in a bag and go shoot some birds or a weekend soccer game.

But it's not without compromises. The autofocus can get moody when the light drops, and the build quality sits near the bottom of our database. Still, for the money, this thing delivers a lot more than it costs. It's a classic value play.

Common Questions

Q: Does this lens have image stabilization?

Yes, this version includes Tamron's vibration compensation (VC), which helps reduce blur when shooting handheld. Some older or budget variants of the 70-300mm don't have it, so double-check the exact model before buying.

Q: Is this lens good for wildlife photography?

It's a solid budget option for wildlife. The 300mm reach gets you close enough for larger animals and birds, and owners report sharp results in good light. Just be prepared for slower autofocus when tracking fast-moving subjects.

Q: Can I use this for macro shots?

Sort of. It has a 1:2 maximum magnification, which is decent for close-ups of flowers and larger insects, but it's not a true 1:1 macro lens. You'll get nice background compression, but don't expect extreme detail on tiny subjects.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you shoot a lot in low light or need fast, reliable autofocus for action. The f/4.0-5.6 aperture is slow, and the AF hunts when the light drops. If you're doing serious portrait work, look elsewhere too. The bokeh is one of the weakest in our database, and the portrait score is frankly bad. And if you're rough on gear, the plasticky build won't hold up to abuse.

Verdict

If you're a hobbyist or beginner who wants to shoot wildlife, birds, or your kid's soccer game without spending a fortune, this Tamron is a no-brainer. It's sharp, light, and versatile, and the vibration compensation makes handheld shooting genuinely viable. Just know what you're signing up for: the autofocus will frustrate you in low light, and the build quality won't survive a drop onto concrete. But for the price, those are trade-offs most people are happy to make.

Usage Scores

Macro (49.9)Overall (49.8)Budget (54.4)Street (35.4)Travel (47.1)Portrait (29.4)Landscape (50.2)Professional (34.5)Video Cinema (37.8)Wildlife Sports (38.9)

Similar Products