LG gram +view gram +view 16" Silver
Snapshot
Vor- und Nachteile
Pros
- Strong compact (99th percentile) 99th
- Strong social proof (86th percentile) 86th
- Strong color (75th percentile) 75th
Cons
- Below average performance (0th percentile)
- Below average feature (23th percentile)
What owners think
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben — so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
- Q3 202472/100
Portable, lightweight, and crisp display praised by remote workers and travelers. Some noted lack of color controls and 60Hz limit, but overall very positive for travel and productivity.
- Highly portable and lightweight, ideal for travel and remote work.
- Sharp, bright display with great clarity and easy plug-and-play setup.
- Color controls limited but workable via profiles; 60Hz refresh noted.
- Works across devices (Chromebook, Surface, MacBook) and useful for dual-monitor setups.
- Q1 202457/100
Buyers praise the display quality and portability but strongly criticize the weak, poorly designed stand/cover and lack of case. Some also note the monitor is larger than expected and has limited settings.
- Stand/cover is weak, unstable, and falls off easily; users recommend buying a separate case.
- Display quality is crisp, bright, and color-accurate; preferred over other monitors tested.
- Size is larger than expected with thick bezels; more portable than a full desktop but not laptop-lid sized.
- Compatibility issues with hubs and HDMI; works directly with laptops but not through some connectors.
- Q3 202360/100
Buyers praise picture quality and Mac compatibility, but reliability issues cause failures after a few months. Some want better features and build.
- Excellent image quality, color, and clarity with Macs
- Works great initially, but some units fail after a few months
- Defective units: monitor powers on but doesn't connect to computer
- Magnetic stand/cover is unstable; no instructions for setup
- Q4 202271/100
Buyers praised the monitor's picture quality, light weight, and productivity boost. However, a significant minority reported fragility, Thunderbolt 4 incompatibility, and early failures with poor LG support.
- Excellent picture quality, thin and light design, easy plug-and-play USB-C setup.
- Boosts productivity as a portable second screen for remote work or travel.
- Screen cracked easily; fragile magnetic stand risks drops if picked up wrong.
- Incompatible with Intel Thunderbolt 4 laptops — monitor turns on but no image.
- Q2 202290/100
Buyers love the slim, lightweight design and easy plug-and-play setup. Picture quality is excellent, though portrait mode software is PC-only and some laptops may have resolution mismatch.
- Extremely lightweight and portable, easy to carry and set up anywhere.
- Excellent picture quality and resolution, with minimal glare.
- Easy plug-and-play via USB-C, but portrait mode requires PC-only software.
- Some smaller laptops may show black bars due to resolution mismatch.
Basierend auf 61 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
The proof
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Display
| Size | 16" |
| Resolution | 2560 (QHD) |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:10 |
| Curved | No |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Response Time | 30 |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 350 nits |
| Color Gamut | DCI-P3 99% |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 0 |
| DisplayPort | 0 |
| USB-C | 2 |
| Speakers | No |
| Headphone Jack | No |
Ergonomics
| Height Adjustable | No |
| Tilt | No |
| Swivel | No |
| Pivot | Yes |
Features
| Webcam | No |
| Touchscreen | No |
| PIP/PBP | No |
| Power | 8 |
| Weight | 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | LG gram +view gram +view 16" | ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG | MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF | Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW | Dell UltraSharp U3425WE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 16 | 26.5 | 27 | 27 | 34 | 34.13999938964844 |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1600 | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 3440x1440 | 3440x1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | OLED | OLED | QD-OLED | QD-OLED | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 60 | 240 | 240 | 500 | 240 | 120 |
| Response Time Ms | 30 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 5 |
| Adaptive Sync | - | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible |
| Hdr | - | HDR10 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | HDR10+ | DisplayHDR 400 True Black | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Color | Compact | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity | Social Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG gram +view gram +view 16" | 74.8 | 99.2 | 62 | 23.4 | 40 | 0.2 | 54.1 | 86.4 |
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG Compare | 96.5 | 74 | 75.7 | 72.6 | 90.6 | 97.9 | 93.2 | 86.4 |
| MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED Compare | 95.9 | 64.1 | 97.3 | 86.5 | 90.6 | 97.9 | 82.4 | 75 |
| Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF Compare | 94 | 64.1 | 76.6 | 72.6 | 90.6 | 99.9 | 98 | 71.5 |
| Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW Compare | 98.3 | 80 | 85.6 | 92 | 90.6 | 97.9 | 95.3 | 95.7 |
| Dell UltraSharp U3425WE Compare | 86.7 | 86.9 | 80.9 | 97.4 | 90.6 | 56.3 | 99.8 | 86.4 |
Price
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
B&H Photo 1 Angebote Ab 310 CA$
Amazon.ca 1 Angebote Ab 336 CA$
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.