Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

1. Q2 202685/1004.8★8 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the lens as a worthy upgrade from Sigma 60-600, highlighting its light weight, telephoto reach, and versatility for wildlife, birds, and aircraft.

   • 👍Lens is light, portable, and hand-holdable for long wildlife walks.
   • 👍Excellent telephoto reach and versatility for birds, bees, aircraft, and landscapes.
   • 🤔Some users question if it's a big upgrade over Canon 100-400mm or 500 f/4, noting trade-offs in aperture.
   • 👍Significantly better user experience compared to heavier Sigma 60-600mm.
2. Q1 202688/1004.9★12 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, autofocus, and image stabilization, especially for wildlife and bird photography. A few noted the telescoping design and a loose tripod collar.

   • 👍Exceptional sharpness and autofocus for wildlife and action photography.
   • 👍High-quality image stabilization enables sharp handheld shots at 500mm.
   • 👍Lightweight and well-built L-series lens, comfortable for long shoots.
   • 🤔Some dislike telescoping design; one report of tripod collar not locking solidly.
3. Q1 202592/1005.0★5 Bewertungen

   Reviewers praise the Canon 100-500mm lens for its versatility, lightweight design, and outstanding image quality, though some note low-light limitations and it may not suit all sports or long hikes.

   • 👍Exceptional versatility for wildlife and nature photography, with excellent build and image quality.
   • 🤔Low-light performance requires adjustment; less ideal for sports than a fixed telephoto or for long hikes.
   • 👍Lighter than the EF 100-400mm, enabling comfortable handheld shooting.
   • 👍Focal range from 100 to 500mm offers flexibility from wide to telephoto shots.
4. Q4 202470/1004.2★6 Bewertungen

   Overall praise for sharpness and wildlife/airshow use. Weight and usability concerns appear in minority of reviews.

   • 👍Lens is sharp, excellent for wildlife and airshow photography
   • 🤔Weight is heavy; good for shorter sessions, less ideal for long hikes
   • 👎Focus issues out of the box resulting in soft images
   • 🤔Teleconverter usability requires full zoom extension, limits zoom range
5. Q2 202494/1004.9★7 Bewertungen

   Reviewers praise this lens for its sharpness, range, and stabilization, making it excellent for sports and telephoto work.

   • 👍Sharp image quality and excellent bokeh at longer focal lengths.
   • 👍Effective stabilization allows handheld use at 500mm.
   • 👍Great for sports and track events, earning high recommendations.
   • 🤔Good in good light, but aperture limitations noted; still versatile.
6. Q1 202498/1005.0★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers in Q1 2024 praise the lens for exceptional sharpness at 500mm, compatibility with extenders, and fast focusing for wildlife.

   • 👍Lens is exceptionally sharp at 500mm and with extenders.
   • 👍Works perfectly with Canon R5, R6, and R6 Mark II.
   • 👍Fast focusing and crisp images for birding and moving subjects.
   • 👍Versatile zoom range with low-light capability at f/4.5.
7. Q4 202383/1004.6★7 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the lens as sharp, lightweight, and versatile for telephoto needs, especially with R bodies. Some note a poor tripod collar and no full-range extender compatibility.

   • 👍Excellent sharpness, focus, and flexibility across 100-500mm zoom range
   • 👍Lightweight design versus alternatives like EF 70-200 or RF 200-800
   • 👎Tripod collar feels insecure; needs extra tightening or third-party replacement
   • 👎Does not support full zoom range with RF 1.4x or 2.0x extenders
8. Q3 202371/1004.6★7 Bewertungen

   Mixed reviews. Image quality praised as sharp and contrasty, but autofocus unreliable and slow aperture draws criticism.

   • 👍Very sharp and high contrast images
   • 👎Autofocus spotty, often produces blurry shots
   • 👎Slow f/7.1 aperture limits low-light and background blur
   • 🤔Zoom ring twist design disliked; internal zoom preferred
9. Q2 2023100/1005.0★3 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, fast focus, and lightweight design, with one noting it's heavy but high-quality.

   • 👍Image quality is super sharp.
   • 👍Lightweight for a super zoom lens.
   • 👍Fast autofocus performance noted.
   • 🤔One user found it heavy at 3 lbs., but quality outstanding.
10. Q4 202275/1004.0★4 Bewertungen

    Strongly positive overall, but a few reliability and autofocus issues were noted.

    • 👍Excellent image quality and low-light stabilization exceed expectations.
    • 👍Attractive bokeh, though small number of aperture leaves affects shape.
    • 🤔RF 2x extender slows autofocus in low light; works well in good light.
    • 👎One unit had a cracked inner element; another found the lens bulky.
11. Q2 202291/1004.8★16 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for excellent sharpness, fast focus, and light weight. Build quality concerns and a single repair issue were noted. Overall, it is highly recommended for wildlife and sports.

    • 👍Exceptional sharpness and image quality across the zoom range.
    • 👍Fast, accurate autofocus with good stabilization, especially on R5/R6.
    • 👎Durability issues: dust entry and lens mount breakage after a drop.
    • 👍Relatively lightweight and well-balanced for handheld use.
12. Q1 202260/1004.0★7 Bewertungen

    Mixed reviews: some buyers love the sharpness and portability, but others report slower autofocus and softness at 500mm compared to older Canon lenses.

    • 👍Sharp lens, especially compared to Tamron 150-600 G2.
    • 👎Slower autofocus and softness at 500mm versus Canon 100-400 or primes.
    • 👎Focus hunting; need to zoom out to 100mm to acquire focus.
    • 🤔Not a prime replacement; good for enthusiasts, less for pros spoiled by f/4.
13. Q4 202185/1004.6★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, light weight, and fast autofocus. However, one reviewer reported moisture ingress after light rain exposure, leading to failure.

    • 👍Sharp, lightweight, and easy to carry for long periods.
    • 👍Excellent for wildlife and bird photography, with reliable autofocus.
    • 👎Moisture ingress caused lens failure despite weather sealing and cover.
    • 🤔Variable aperture noted as a minor drawback by one buyer.

Basierend auf 299 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.