Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm
Leitz Cine
27 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 4 | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | Nano | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.1 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.84 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 220 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:1.7★ | 0.5x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Leitz Cine HEKTOR 18mm T2.1 18mm0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.056Score pro Dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm bietet 18.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
