Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 203101

Sigma 203101

Sigma
46 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
44
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
56
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
48
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
50
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
41
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
42
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
43
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
40
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
36

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma 203101
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm8 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm16 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements34
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4.5
Min Aperturef/2.84.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.56 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorHSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm239 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.12x

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma 203101

  • Strong optical (76th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)

Preise

Sigma 203101 is 697 CA$ cheaper (1.9x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sigma 203101

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen