Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro
Laowa
35 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | — | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 70 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/10 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/0.15 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.39 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 20 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 50:1★ | 1:4.8 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro0.017Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.119Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD bietet 7.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
