Laowa 6mm f/2 Zero-D 6mm
Laowa
36 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Laowa 6mm f/2 Zero-D 6mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 6 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 6 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 3 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 5 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Fujifilm X |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 90 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55 | 1:4.8 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Laowa 6mm f/2 Zero-D 6mm
- Strong macro (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average bokeh (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average social proof (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Laowa 6mm f/2 Zero-D 6mm0.052Score pro Dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.119Score pro Dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD bietet 2.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Laowa 6mm f/2 Zero-D 6mm
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Fazit
Gewinner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
