Sigma 668110 17-70mm
Sigma
54 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma 668110 17-70mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 70 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 2.8-4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sigma | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.52 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HSM | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma 668110 17-70mm
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average build (26th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Preise
Sigma 668110 17-70mm0.073Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062Score pro Dollar
Sigma 668110 17-70mm bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
