Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm
Zeiss
36 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Travel
Street
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 40 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 17 |
| Groups | 11 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 9★ | 4 |
| Coating | ZEISS T* anti-reflective coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/1.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.34 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 86 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Manual Focus | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.00 m | 280 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:8.6 | 1:4.8 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
Preise
Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm0.005Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC0.072Score pro Dollar
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC bietet 14.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
