Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
Laowa
30 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 200 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 11 |
| Groups | 11 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | 1034 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.56 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 105 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 1.50 m |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | 0.15x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
- Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
- Below average macro (28th percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.076Score pro Dollar
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm0.011Score pro Dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm bietet 6.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
