Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm
Laowa
28 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 13 |
| Groups | 11 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 0 |
| ED Elements | 5★ | 2 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | UHR glass |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 13★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.56 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55 | 1:14.3 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm
- Strong optical (68th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.076Score pro Dollar
vs
Laowa Argus 28mm f/1.2 28mm0.034Score pro Dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm bietet 2.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
