AMD EPYC 9754 128-core SP5
Packing 128 Zen 4c cores and 256 threads on a 5nm process, this processor delivers a PassMark multi-core score of 115,016 for dense cloud-native workloads. Its 256MB of L3 cache and 12-channel DDR5 memory support provide massive throughput, while dual-socket capability allows scaling to 256 cores in a single server. This chip is best for hyperscale data centers running high-density containerized applications where core count per rack is the primary metric.
暂无零售商最新价格
概览
The 30-Second Version
128 cores of Zen 4c fury with a PassMark score that makes other server chips look sleepy. Just make sure your power bill and cooling setup are ready for the 360W heat.
Pros & Cons
优点
- 128 cores and 256 threads is best-in-class for dense server workloads 100th
- PassMark multi-core of 115,016 is top of the charts 100th
- 12-channel DDR5 with ECC support is a serious memory advantage 99th
- PCIe 5.0 and dual-socket support make it scalable 88th
缺点
- 360W TDP means you need serious cooling and a beefy power budget
- Single-thread performance is just okay at 2,403
- No integrated graphics, so you'll need a separate GPU
- Social proof is nearly nonexistent at the 12th percentile
实测数据
Performance
The multi-threaded numbers are absurd. 115,016 in PassMark puts this in the 99th percentile for multi-thread, and our AI and platform scores land at the very top of the charts. The 256MB of L3 cache and 12-channel DDR5 memory give it serious bandwidth for virtualization and dense container workloads. Single-thread is a different story. 2,403 puts it at the 67th percentile, which is fine but not exciting. The 3.1GHz boost clock is modest, and that's the trade-off for 128 cores on a 5nm process. Efficiency is the real weak spot at 39.7 out of 100. At 360W TDP and 400W turbo, this thing drinks power like it's going out of style.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | EPYC |
| Model | 9754 |
| Codename | Bergamo |
| Class | server |
| Process | 5 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 128 |
| P-cores | 128 |
| Threads | 256 |
| Base Clock | 2250 |
| Boost Clock | 3100 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 128 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 115016 |
| PassMark Single | 2403 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 4800 |
| Channels | 12 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | SP5 |
| PCIe | 5 |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 |
| TDP | 360 |
| Max Turbo Power | 400 |
| Unlocked | No |
vs Competition
The EPYC 9754 goes head to head with the SMC EPYC 9555P and HP Xeon P67080-B21 in the server space. The 9555P is a solid alternative if you want similar core counts with different power characteristics, but the 9754's 256MB of L3 cache gives it an edge in cache-sensitive workloads. Against the Xeon, the AMD chip generally wins on raw core count and memory bandwidth, though Intel's ecosystem support can be a factor in enterprise deployments. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and D&H Core i9 are desktop chips and honestly not in the same league for server tasks, so if you're cross-shopping those, you're looking at the wrong category.
| Spec | AMD EPYC 9754 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | SMC EPYC 9555P | HP Xeon 6526Y | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 128 | 24 | 64 | 16 | 24 | - |
| Threads | 256 | 24 | 128 | 32 | 48 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3100 | 5700 | 4400 | 3900 | 4000 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 256 | 36 | 256 | 37 | 128 | - |
| Tdp W | 360 | 125 | 360 | 195 | 200 | - |
| Socket | SP5 | LGA 1851 | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA 4677 | AMD Socket SP3 | - |
| Integrated Graphics | - | Intel Graphics | - | No | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 产品 | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | 用户口碑 | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | 99.6 | 77.4 | 99.9 | 88 | 99.3 | 11.5 | 1 | 68 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.9 | 96 | 97.2 | 96.4 | 90.4 | 18.3 | 99.9 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.4 | 96.7 | 89.7 | 99.4 | 0 | 0.5 | 85.9 |
| HP Xeon 6526Y Compare | 92.1 | 77.4 | 90.7 | 79.3 | 89.9 | 0 | 2.6 | 80.6 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.8 | 77.4 | 84.4 | 85.1 | 93.9 | 36.4 | 5.3 | 80.5 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.8 | 20.7 | 17.5 | 66.6 | 97.1 | 0 | 6.4 | 98.4 |
价格
Value & Pricing
At $5,499 USD, this is a lot of money for a CPU. But if you're running a virtualization host or AI inference farm where core count is king, the price per core is actually reasonable. You're getting 128 cores for under $43 per core, which is hard to beat in the server space. Just don't buy this for a workstation unless you have a very specific reason.
了解更多
Overview
The AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128-core monster built for one thing: crushing heavily threaded server workloads. With 256 threads and a PassMark multi-core score of 115,016, this chip sits at the absolute top of our database for platform and AI performance. It's not a desktop toy, it's a data center workhorse that happens to be available in a tray pack if you know where to look.
Common Questions
Q: Can I use this in a regular desktop motherboard?
No. This is a Socket SP5 server chip. You need a server board with SP5 support, and those aren't cheap or small.
Q: Do I need a separate graphics card?
Yes. The EPYC 9754 has no integrated graphics, so you'll need a basic GPU just to get video output for setup and management.
Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?
No, it's locked. You can push memory speeds beyond 4800 MT/s with the right modules, but the CPU multiplier itself is fixed.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a gaming rig or a general-purpose workstation, this isn't it. Go get a Ryzen 9 or Core i9 instead. This chip is for people running dense virtualization, AI inference, or other heavily threaded server workloads where 256 threads actually matter.
Verdict
The EPYC 9754 is the right choice if you need maximum thread density and don't care about power draw. It's a specialized tool for specialized workloads, and in that role it's exceptional. For general-purpose servers or anything single-thread dependent, you're better off with a higher-clocked chip with fewer cores.
Usage Scores
- 总体75.5
- AI/LLM90.4
- Budget37.4
- 游戏42.4
- Server94.1
- Efficiency40.5
- Productivity89