Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 11" A9+ Graphite 2023
The Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and 90Hz 11-inch LCD with 480 nits brightness deliver smooth scrolling and clear outdoor visibility. The 7040mAh battery supports long reading sessions, while the 481g weight and 6.9mm profile make it easy to hold. Best for budget-conscious readers and students who need a light, durable tablet for e-books and streaming.
현재 판매처 최신 가격 없음
요약
The 30-Second Version
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ is a budget Android tablet with a surprisingly nice 11-inch 90Hz display and decent speakers, but it's held back by weak performance and serious reliability complaints. Charging port failures are a recurring theme in owner reviews, which is concerning for a device people expect to last. It's a decent buy under USD 200 for light streaming and reading, but skip it if you need something dependable for daily use.
Pros & Cons
장점
- Big 11-inch 90Hz display feels smooth for the price 89th
- Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos sound decent 69th
- Expandable storage via microSD card
- Lightweight at 481g, easy to hold for reading
- Affordable entry point, especially at the low end of US pricing
단점
- Charging port failures reported within months by multiple owners
- 4GB RAM and eMMC storage cause lag with multitasking
- GPU is nearly bottom of the barrel, gaming is rough
- Very slow charging speed, even with a fast charger
- No fingerprint sensor, face unlock only
사용자 의견
The Word on the Street
시간에 따라 사용자 평판이 어떻게 변했는가
독점고객이 실제로 리뷰를 작성한 시점을 기준으로 합니다. 초기의 호평이 유지되었는지 확인할 수 있습니다.
- Q3 202685/100
Buyers in Q3 2026 praised the tablet for gaming, kids' use, and value. Some reported battery and charging issues.
- Great for kids and gaming, with smooth performance and clear display.
- Good value for the price, easy to use, and suitable for everyday tasks.
- Battery drains quickly or won't stay charged for some users.
- USB charging port fails, requiring multiple repairs within months.
- Q2 202667/100
Buyers praised the large screen, value, and performance for basic tasks. However, many reported charging port failures, battery drain, and devices dying within a year.
- Large, clear screen and good picture quality for streaming and reading.
- Charging port fails or stops recognizing charger after months of use.
- Battery drains quickly, won't hold charge, or device won't boot on charger.
- Good for basic tasks but slow or laggy with multiple apps or heavy use.
- Q1 202678/100
Buyers in Q1 2026 praised the tablet for kids, durability, and value. Some reported charging port failures and slow performance.
- Great for kids: durable, easy to use, good parental controls, and better than Fire tablets.
- Charging port failures reported within months, requiring repairs or exchanges.
- Performance is good for basic tasks but some find it slow or unresponsive.
- No charging brick included; some chargers don't work reliably.
- Q4 202570/100
Buyers in Q4 2025 praised the tablet's kid-friendliness, parental controls, and durable case, but some reported charging port failures, slow performance, and open-box reset issues.
- Great for kids with strong parental controls and easy setup.
- Charging port failures reported in multiple units, requiring replacement.
- Performance is good for basic use but lags or is slow for some.
- Open-box units may have reset issues requiring store visit.
- Q3 202582/100
Buyers in Q3 2025 praise the tablet for kids' entertainment, display, and kid mode, but note issues with color accuracy, stylus tip durability, and a charging port failure.
- Great for kids: large display, kid mode, and included case/stylus.
- Stylus tips break off easily; sensitivity could be better.
- Wrong color received (ordered blue, got purple).
- One unit broke at the charging port, requiring replacement.
- Q2 202583/100
Buyers in Q2 2025 praised the tablet as great for kids, with good battery life, sturdy case, and easy parental controls. Some reported issues with volume buttons, charging, pen, freezing, and reliability.
- Excellent for kids: easy to use, good parental controls, sturdy case, and long battery life.
- Volume buttons and power button can be hard to press or unresponsive.
- Some units develop blue screen or charging issues after a few months.
- Pen not working well for some; occasional freezing reported.
- Q1 202583/100
Buyers praise the tablet as a great value for kids, with durable case and parental controls. A few report slow performance, charging issues, or defects.
- Great value and price for a kids' tablet.
- Durable case and child-friendly design.
- Parental controls and ease of use.
- Slow performance, charging issues, and defects reported.
- Q4 202488/100
Buyers praised this tablet as a great, durable, and easy-to-use gift for kids, with one reporting a charging issue.
- Great gift for kids, better than Amazon tablets.
- Durable, easy to use, and works smoothly.
- Kids love it; a hit at Christmas.
- One unit failed to charge after 3 hours.
날짜가 있는 고객 리뷰 504건을 기준으로 달력 분기별로 묶었습니다. 기간별 분석은 영어로 제공됩니다.
근거 자료
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G is a mid-range 8-core chip that lands around the 64th percentile in our database. That's solid, not spectacular. Apps open fine, web browsing is smooth, and the 90Hz refresh rate helps the whole experience feel more responsive than the raw specs suggest. But the 4GB of RAM sits at the 31st percentile, and the 64GB eMMC storage is at the 30th. eMMC is the slow kind of flash storage, and you'll notice it when installing apps or loading larger files.
The GPU is the real weak spot here, landing at the 2nd percentile. That's one of the worst we've seen in this category. Casual games like Candy Crush or 2D puzzlers run fine, but anything 3D will chug. Don't expect to play Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile at anything resembling a playable frame rate. The 7040mAh battery ranks at the 69th percentile, which is above average on paper. In practice, users report mixed results, with some praising all-day battery life for streaming and others complaining about rapid drain and painfully slow charging speeds.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375) |
| Cores | 8 |
| GPU | X1 |
Memory & Storage
| RAM | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC |
| Expandable | Yes |
Display
| Size | 11" |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 (Full HD) |
| Panel | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz |
| Brightness | 480 nits |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| USB-C | 1 |
| Cellular | No |
Features
| Stylus Support | No |
| Stylus Model | 2-in-1 Stylus Pen |
| Fingerprint Reader | No |
| Face Unlock | Yes |
Physical
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs |
| OS | Android 13 |
vs Competition
Against the Apple iPad 9.7, the Galaxy Tab A9+ wins on screen size and refresh rate but loses badly on performance and app ecosystem. The iPad's A-series chip runs circles around the Snapdragon 695, and iPadOS is just better optimized for tablet use. If you're already in the Apple ecosystem, the iPad is the safer bet even if it costs more upfront.
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is probably the closest direct competitor. It offers similar screen specs and a cleaner software experience in some ways, though availability in the US is spotty. The Microsoft Surface Pro 7 is a completely different animal, a full Windows machine that costs way more and targets productivity users. If you need to run desktop apps, the A9+ isn't even in the conversation. The UMIDIGI Active T1 and MENTUME K30 are budget rugged tablets that undercut the A9+ on price but feel noticeably cheaper in build quality and screen quality.
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 11" A9+ | Apple iPad Pro M5 | Microsoft Surface Pro 11 | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus ZAEG0096US | Xiaomi Pad 7 2AFZZCRP4CG | Vekfulpc T60 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375) | Apple M5 | Intel Core Ultra 7 268V | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 2800 MHz | 2.2 GHz |
| RAM (GB) | 4 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 8 |
| Storage (GB) | 64 | 1024 | 1024 | 256 | 256 | 256 |
| Screen | 11" 1920x1200 | 13" 2752x2064 | 13" 2880x1920 | 12.7" 2944x1840 | 11.2" 3200x2136 | 13.4" |
| OS | Android 13 | iPadOS | Windows 11 Pro | Android 14 | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Stylus | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Cellular | false | true | false | false | false | true |
| Battery (Wh) | - | 39 | 47 | - | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 제품 | CPU | GPU | RAM | 화면 | Battery | Feature | 저장 공간 | User Sentiment | Connectivity | 사용자 평판 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 11" A9+ | 64.2 | 1.5 | 30.7 | 59.9 | 68.6 | 43.7 | 29.5 | 3.9 | 63.9 | 89.3 |
| Apple iPad Pro M5 Compare | 96.6 | 97.4 | 87.5 | 99.8 | 97.7 | 96.9 | 98 | 77.7 | 99.1 | 99.3 |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 11 Compare | 73.3 | 92.6 | 92.9 | 99.3 | 98.8 | 84.6 | 98 | 0 | 92.8 | 80.5 |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus ZAEG0096US Compare | 69 | 66.2 | 92.9 | 97 | 89.1 | 96.9 | 83.5 | 88.2 | 92.8 | 89.3 |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 2AFZZCRP4CG Compare | 97.3 | 95.3 | 66.1 | 98.6 | 84.3 | 52.8 | 83.5 | 88.2 | 78.3 | 92.6 |
| Vekfulpc T60 Pro Compare | 93.1 | 89 | 66.1 | 62.7 | 86.4 | 88.8 | 74 | 55.1 | 59.7 | 85.2 |
가격
Value & Pricing
Value here depends entirely on what you pay. At USD 83, this tablet is a steal for a secondary device or a kid's streaming machine. At USD 550, you're getting fleeced, that's iPad territory and the A9+ doesn't compete there. The sweet spot is probably somewhere in the USD 150 to USD 200 range, where the big screen and decent speakers make it a reasonable buy for casual use. Best Buy tends to have the most consistent pricing among US listings, while Amazon's renewed units can dip lower but come with the usual refurbished-device caveats. If you see it near the top of that USD 550 range, walk away and buy something else.
더 보기
Overview
The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ is a budget Android tablet that tries to punch above its weight class. You get an 11-inch 90Hz display, a Snapdragon 695 chip, 4GB of RAM, and 64GB of storage. Pricing is all over the place depending on where you look, with US listings ranging from USD 83 to USD 550, so shopping around matters more than usual here. It's aimed at people who want a big screen for streaming, reading, and light browsing without spending iPad money.
Is the Galaxy Tab A9+ good for everyday use? For basic tasks, mostly yes. The 90Hz panel makes scrolling feel smoother than you'd expect at this price, and the quad speakers with Dolby Atmos are a nice touch for watching videos. But the 4GB of RAM and eMMC storage are the bottlenecks. Open too many apps and you'll feel it. This is not a productivity machine, and our database puts its productivity score at a weak 32 out of 100.
One thing that stands out in our data is the gap between the spec sheet and real-world reliability. The customer rating sits at 4.5 out of 5 across 30,144 reviews, which sounds great. But dig into the actual feedback and you'll find a recurring theme: charging port failures within months. That's a big red flag for a device people expect to last a couple years.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ good for gaming?
Not really. The GPU ranks at the 2nd percentile in our database, which means it's one of the worst we've seen for graphics performance. Casual 2D games are fine, but anything 3D will struggle.
Q: How long does the Galaxy Tab A9+ battery last?
The 7040mAh battery is above average on paper, and many users get a full day of streaming or reading. However, some owners report rapid drain and the charging speed is very slow, often taking several hours for a full charge.
Q: Does the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ support expandable storage?
Yes, it has a microSD card slot for expandable storage. That's helpful because the built-in 64GB fills up fast, especially with apps and downloaded videos.
Q: Is the Galaxy Tab A9+ better than an iPad?
For screen size and refresh rate at a lower price, the A9+ has an edge. But the iPad 9.7 has a much faster processor, better app ecosystem, and stronger long-term reliability, so it's the better choice for most people who can afford it.
Who Should Skip This
Skip the Galaxy Tab A9+ if you need a tablet for gaming, heavy multitasking, or any kind of productivity work. The weak GPU and 4GB of RAM will frustrate you quickly. It's also a bad choice if you plan to use it as your primary device for years, given the charging port reliability issues. Students who need to run demanding apps or anyone who wants a tablet for creative work should look at the iPad 9.7 or a Surface Pro 7 instead. And if you're buying for a kid who's rough on devices, the UMIDIGI Active T1's rugged build might survive longer than the A9+'s charging port.
Verdict
Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+? If you need a cheap, big-screen tablet for streaming Netflix, reading ebooks, and light web browsing, and you can find it under USD 200, it's a reasonable pick. The display is genuinely nice for the price, the speakers are better than expected, and the expandable storage means you can work around the limited 64GB.
But the reliability concerns are hard to ignore. Multiple owners report charging port failures within months, and Samsung's customer support gets called out repeatedly in reviews. That's a gamble. If this is going to be your only tablet and you need it to last two or three years, we'd steer you toward an iPad or a higher-end Samsung Tab S series instead. The A9+ is a fine secondary device, not a daily driver you can count on.