Intel Core i7 6900K 8-core LGA 2011-v3
Eight Broadwell-E cores with 16 threads and a 3.7GHz boost clock tackle multi-threaded workloads, backed by 20MB of L3 cache and a fully unlocked multiplier on the LGA 2011-3 socket. It provides 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes and quad-channel DDR4 memory support, enabling configurations with multiple discrete GPUs and high-speed storage. This processor suits workstation users running heavily threaded applications like 3D rendering or video encoding who need extensive platform expandability over peak single-core speed.
現在、販売店の最新価格はありません
概要
The 30-Second Version
The i7-6900K is an 8-core, 16-thread Broadwell-E chip that still holds up for multi-threaded work, with a PassMark multi-core score of 14,629. It's a solid buy if you already have an X99 board and can find one at the low end of the $99 to $289 US price range. But the 140W TDP, lack of included cooler, and dead LGA 2011-v3 platform make it a tough recommendation for new builds. If you're starting fresh, a used Ryzen 7 is probably the smarter move.
Pros & Cons
長所
- 8 cores and 16 threads for heavy multi-threaded workloads 84th
- 20MB L3 cache and quad-channel DDR4 memory support 80th
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking headroom 77th
- Strong feature set at the 84th percentile for desktop CPUs 70th
- LGA 2011-v3 platform has mature, stable BIOS support
短所
- 140W TDP means serious cooling requirements
- No included cooler, you'll need to buy one separately
- Single-thread performance is mediocre by modern standards
- Dead platform with expensive, hard-to-find motherboards
- No Windows 11 support without workarounds
オーナーの声
The Word on the Street
購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか
独自顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。
日付のある顧客レビュー 10 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。
実証データ
Performance
The multi-threaded PassMark score of 14,629 puts this chip at the 70th percentile among desktop CPUs in our database. That's solid, especially for a 2016 part. For context, it'll chew through video encodes and 3D renders without breaking a sweat. The 16 threads mean you can run a render in the background while still having a responsive system for other tasks. The quad-channel memory controller helps here too, feeding all those cores without bottlenecking.
Single-thread performance is a different story. The 2,342 single-thread PassMark score lands at the 67th percentile, which is fine but not exciting. Modern mid-range chips from both AMD and Intel will beat it in lightly-threaded tasks like gaming or basic productivity. The 3.7GHz boost clock is the limiting factor. Turbo Boost Max 3.0 helps identify the best cores and push them harder, but there's only so much you can do with a 14nm process from this era. If your workload is mostly single-threaded, this chip will feel slower than its core count suggests.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Core i7 |
| Model | 6900K |
| Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 14 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 8 |
| Threads | 16 |
| Base Clock | 3200 |
| Boost Clock | 3700 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 2 |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 14629 |
| PassMark Single | 2342 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 2400 |
| Channels | 4 |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA 2011-v3 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 |
| TDP | 140 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | None |
vs Competition
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the obvious modern comparison. It absolutely destroys the 6900K in gaming and single-threaded work, and it does it at a fraction of the power draw. But it's also a lot more expensive and requires a new AM5 motherboard and DDR5 memory. If you're building from scratch, the 7800X3D is the better choice for almost everyone. The 6900K only makes sense if you already have an X99 board sitting around.
The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is an interesting alternative on the used market. It's a 4-core chip, so it won't match the 6900K in multi-threaded workloads, but it's often dirt cheap and runs on LGA 2011 boards that are more common. The ADVB3 Phenom II X6 is a budget option with 6 cores, but it's ancient and will struggle with modern software. The be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 isn't even a CPU, it's a cooler, so that comparison is a bit odd. The DAKboard CPU v4 is a niche ARM-based option that's not really in the same category. For most people cross-shopping this chip, the real decision is between the 6900K and a used Ryzen 7 1700 or 2700, which offer similar core counts on a platform with better upgrade paths.
| Spec | Intel Core i7 6900K | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 | 18 | 16 | 24 | - |
| Threads | 16 | 16 | 36 | 32 | 48 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3700 | 5200 | 4400 | 3900 | 4000 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 20 | 96 | 24.75 | 37.5 | 128 | - |
| Tdp W | 140 | 120 | 165 | 195 | 200 | - |
| Socket | LGA 2011-v3 | AM5 | LGA2066 | LGA 4677 | AMD Socket SP3 | - |
| Integrated Graphics | None | AMD Radeon Graphics | - | No | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 製品 | AI | Feature | Platform | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Multi Thread | ユーザー評価 | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7 6900K | 70.1 | 83.6 | 80.3 | 21.4 | 56.7 | 68 | 76.5 | 45.5 | 66.2 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare | 91.3 | 98.5 | 95.2 | 92.5 | 88.1 | 88.7 | 96.5 | 23.6 | 94.7 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Compare | 97.3 | 62.6 | 82.5 | 0 | 99.4 | 99.8 | 72.4 | 7.8 | 95.7 |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 Compare | 91.8 | 77.1 | 90.7 | 0 | 78.1 | 89.4 | 0 | 2.7 | 79.7 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.7 | 77.1 | 84.2 | 0 | 84.3 | 93.5 | 36.4 | 5.4 | 79.6 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.2 | 20.4 | 17.9 | 0 | 65.7 | 96.9 | 0 | 6.7 | 98.2 |
価格
Value & Pricing
Pricing on this chip is all over the place. In the US, listings range from $99 to $289 across three vendors. That's a huge spread for the same silicon. If you can find one at the low end of that range, it's a genuinely interesting budget option for multi-threaded work. At $289, you're getting into territory where a used Ryzen 7 or even a new mid-range chip makes way more sense.
In Europe, the spread is even wider. EUR 209 to EUR 498 across four listings in Germany, Spain, France, and Italy. The low end is reasonable for what you get. The high end is frankly absurd for a 2016 processor. Canadian buyers see a tighter range of CAD 177 to CAD 259, which is more sane. The key takeaway is to shop around. This chip's value depends entirely on which listing you find, and the difference between a good deal and a bad one is hundreds of dollars.
Price History
詳細情報
Overview
The Intel Core i7-6900K is a Broadwell-E chip from 2016 that still pops up on the used market and in older workstation builds. It's an 8-core, 16-thread processor on the LGA 2011-v3 socket, running a 3.2GHz base clock with a 3.7GHz boost. No integrated graphics, which is normal for this class of chip. You'll need a dedicated GPU, but if you're buying an 8-core HEDT processor, you probably already have one.
This is a chip for people who need lots of threads without spending modern money. Video editors, 3D renderers, and folks running virtual machines are the target audience. The 20MB of L3 cache and quad-channel DDR4 memory support give it real bandwidth for memory-hungry workloads. Our database puts its feature set at the 84th percentile for desktop CPUs, which is strong for a chip this old.
The catch is that this is a 140W TDP part on a dead platform. LGA 2011-v3 motherboards are getting harder to find, and X99 boards with good VRMs command a premium on the used market. If you already have the board, this chip makes sense. If you're starting from scratch, you need to think carefully about whether the platform cost kills the value proposition.
Common Questions
Q: Does the i7-6900K come with a CPU cooler?
No, it doesn't. Intel didn't include a stock cooler with this chip, and at 140W TDP you wouldn't want one anyway. You'll need a decent aftermarket cooler, ideally something rated for at least 150W. A good air cooler or a 240mm AIO liquid cooler will handle it fine, even with some overclocking headroom.
Q: What motherboard do I need for this processor?
You need an LGA 2011-v3 socket motherboard, which means an X99 chipset board. These are no longer manufactured, so you'll be shopping the used market. Prices vary wildly, and boards with good VRMs for overclocking command a premium. Make sure the board's BIOS supports Broadwell-E chips, since some early X99 boards needed a BIOS update to work with this generation.
Q: Can this chip run Windows 11?
Not officially. The 6900K isn't on Microsoft's supported CPU list for Windows 11, so you'd need to use a workaround or stick with Windows 10. Windows 10 support ends in October 2025, so this is a real consideration. If you need Windows 11 without hacks, this chip isn't the right choice.
Q: Is the i7-6900K good for gaming?
It's okay but not great. The 8 cores help in modern games that can use more threads, but the single-thread performance is mediocre by today's standards. Games that rely heavily on single-core speed will feel slower than on a modern mid-range chip. If gaming is your primary use, a newer 6-core or 8-core chip from AMD or Intel will serve you better.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a new system from scratch, skip this chip. The LGA 2011-v3 platform is dead, X99 motherboards are expensive on the used market, and there's no upgrade path. You'd be better off with a used Ryzen 7 1700 or 2700, which offer similar core counts on AM4 boards that are cheaper and have actual upgrade options. The single-thread performance on those chips is also better.
Gamers should also look elsewhere. The 6900K's single-thread score of 2,342 in PassMark is fine but not exciting, and modern games will feel snappier on a newer chip with better IPC. If you don't need 8 cores and 16 threads for rendering or virtualization, you're paying for cores you won't use. A modern 6-core chip will beat this in gaming and cost less to run, thanks to the 6900K's 140W power draw.
Verdict
If you already own an X99 motherboard and need more cores, the 6900K is a no-brainer at the right price. It's the cheapest way to get 8 cores and 16 threads on that platform, and the performance is still respectable for rendering, encoding, and virtualization. Just make sure you have a decent cooler, because 140W is no joke.
For everyone else, this chip is a harder sell. The platform is dead, motherboards are expensive, and there's no upgrade path. A used Ryzen 7 or a modern budget chip will give you better single-threaded performance, lower power draw, and a platform that isn't a dead end. The 6900K is a great chip for a very specific situation, and a questionable choice for everything else.