Nikon ZR Black 2025
A 24.5MP full-frame CMOS sensor with RED Color Science and 6K REDCODE RAW recording sets this cinema camera apart for professional video work. It pairs 7.5-stop IBIS with 32-bit float audio and a bright 1000-nit DCI-P3 touchscreen, making it a self-contained production tool. Best for filmmakers and content creators who need RAW video, reliable autofocus, and high-quality audio in a lightweight 540g body.
現在、販売店の最新価格はありません
概要
The 30-Second Version
The Nikon ZR is a compact full-frame cinema camera with 6K REDCODE RAW, excellent stabilization, and best-in-class battery life. It's a great B-camera or video-focused companion for Nikon shooters, but the autofocus is genuinely bad and the plastic build feels cheap. Buy it for the image quality and RAW workflow, not for hybrid shooting or reliable AF.
Pros & Cons
長所
- 6K REDCODE RAW video with RED color science 100th
- Excellent 7.5-stop IBIS for handheld work 97th
- Compact and light at 540g 97th
- Bright 4-inch DCI-P3 touchscreen at 1,000 nits 96th
- Outstanding battery life at 2,280 shots per charge
- 32-bit float audio input built in
短所
- Autofocus is genuinely bad, 2nd percentile in our database
- No viewfinder at all
- Plastic build feels hollow and cheap
- Only 9 AF points in 2025
- Photography performance is weak at 55.7/100
- Price varies wildly between vendors
オーナーの声
The Word on the Street
購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか
独自顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。
- Q2 202682/100
Buyers praise the Nikon ZR's image quality, RED RAW video, compact size, and screen, but note ergonomic issues, menu complexity, large file sizes, and missing features like focus peaking.
- Image quality and RED RAW video are standout features, with sharp, cinematic footage and easy color grading.
- Ergonomics and controls are criticized: lack of buttons, EVF, and grip, but some find it acceptable for a compact cinema body.
- File sizes from R3D are huge, making storage costly and workflow demanding; some suggest compression is needed.
- Menus are poorly designed and lack features like focus peaking; firmware updates are needed to improve usability.
- Q1 202679/100
Buyers praise image quality, color science, and R3D workflow, calling it a great hybrid for indie filmmakers. However, some report a fragile micro HDMI port, firmware issues with focus peaking, and a hollow build without a viewfinder.
- Image quality and color science are fantastic, with beautiful footage straight out of camera, often compared favorably to Sony and Canon.
- R3D codec and RED color science are game changers for indie filmmakers, offering professional features at a sub-$2.5k price.
- Micro HDMI port is fragile and shorts easily, requiring replacement; users advise caution for run-and-gun use.
- Build quality feels hollow and plastic to some, and lack of viewfinder disappoints, though others find it lightweight and well-built.
- Q4 2025100/100
Buyers in Q4 2025 praised the Nikon ZR for its compact size, professional performance, and value, noting it rivals larger cameras and matches well with cinema rigs.
- Compact yet powerful, ideal for portability without sacrificing professional quality.
- Matches color and performance with high-end cameras like Komodo-X and V-Raptor.
- Excellent value for price, with features that excite video creation.
- Reliable autofocus, dynamic range, and audio quality, with minor quirks not affecting overall satisfaction.
日付のある顧客レビュー 30 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。
実証データ
Performance
The ZR's video chops are the headline. It records 6K full-frame, 4K at 120fps, and 1080p at 240fps, all in 10-bit with Log and RAW options. REDCODE RAW (R3D NE) is the big deal here. That format gives you massive flexibility for ISO, exposure, and color grading in post, and it's the same pipeline RED has been refining for years. In our database, the ZR's video score lands in the 97th percentile, which puts it among the best cinema-focused bodies we've tested. The burst rate is also absurd at 120fps mechanical, though that's less relevant for a cinema camera than it would be on a sports body.
Stabilization is another standout. The built-in IBIS delivers up to 7.5 stops of shake reduction with compatible lenses, which is top-tier. Battery life is genuinely excellent at 2,280 shots per charge, and that's the 100th percentile in our database. The 4-inch DCI-P3 touchscreen hits 1,000 nits and 3.07M dots, which is bright enough for outdoor shooting and accurate enough for color work. The 32-bit float audio input is a nice touch for run-and-gun shooters who don't want to carry a separate recorder.
But the autofocus is a real problem. The ZR has 9 AF points, which sounds like a spec from 2015. In our database, its AF performance sits in the 2nd percentile. That's not a typo. For a camera aimed at content creators and solo shooters, having AF this far behind the competition is a serious limitation. Eye AF and subject detection exist on paper, but the implementation is nowhere near what Sony, Canon, or even Fujifilm are doing right now.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Sensor
| Type | CMOS |
| Size | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 24.5 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 |
| Processor | EXPEED 7 |
Autofocus
| AF Points | 9 |
| AF Type | Auto, Manual |
| Eye AF | Yes |
| Animal AF | Yes |
| Subject Detection | Yes |
Shooting
| Burst (Mechanical) | 120 |
| Burst (Electronic) | 120 |
| Max Shutter | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | Yes |
Video
| Max Resolution | 6K |
| 4K FPS | 120 |
| 1080p FPS | 240 |
| 10-bit | Yes |
| Log Profile | Yes |
| RAW Video | Yes |
| Codec | ProRes RAW, H.265, H.264 |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 4" |
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Articulating | Yes |
| EVF Resolution | 3.69 M dots |
Build
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.2 lbs |
| Battery Life | 400 |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| USB | USB-C |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | Yes |
vs Competition
Against the Fujifilm X-H2S, the ZR wins on RAW video and color science but loses badly on autofocus and build quality. The X-H2S has a stacked APS-C sensor with genuinely reliable subject tracking, and it feels like a professional tool in the hand. The ZR feels like a prototype by comparison, though its full-frame sensor and RED pipeline give it an edge for pure image quality.
The Sony a7R V is a different beast entirely. It's a high-resolution stills monster that happens to shoot excellent video, while the ZR is a video-first camera that's mediocre at stills. If you need one camera for both, the Sony is the obvious choice. The Canon EOS R6 Mark III also outclasses the ZR on autofocus and hybrid versatility, though it can't touch the ZR's RAW workflow. The Panasonic Lumix S5 II is probably the closest competitor in spirit, a video-focused full-frame body with great stabilization, but its AF is also far ahead of the ZR's. The OM System OM-1 is a micro four thirds body that's not really in the same conversation for cinema work, though it's a better stills camera.
| Spec | Nikon ZR | Sony Cinema Line FX30 | Fujifilm X-H2 | Panasonic Lumix G G9 II | OM System OM-1 Mark II | Canon EOS R5 Mark II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | cinema | cinema | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | 24.5MP full-frame | 26MP aps-c | 40.2MP aps-c | 25.2MP micro-four-thirds | 20.4MP micro-four-thirds | 45MP full-frame |
| AF Points | 9 | 759 | 425 | 779 | 1053 | 1053 |
| Burst FPS | 120 | 120 | 15 | 75 | 120 | 30 |
| Video | 6K @120fps | 4K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 4K @120fps | 4K @60fps | 8K @120fps |
| IBIS | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 540 | 646 | 579 | 575 | 511 | 588 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 製品 | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | User Sentiment | ユーザー評価 | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon ZR | 3.2 | 94.8 | 94.3 | 99.6 | 96.5 | 61.6 | 92.9 | 87.6 | 33.7 | 89.6 | 24.5 | 97.3 |
| Sony Cinema Line FX30 Compare | 97 | 87.7 | 95.6 | 99.6 | 92.2 | 95.4 | 96.7 | 87.6 | 82.5 | 94.3 | 16.9 | 89.1 |
| Fujifilm X-H2 Compare | 92.4 | 96.9 | 94.6 | 82.4 | 95.4 | 98.9 | 97.8 | 87.6 | 82.5 | 89.6 | 23.8 | 95.9 |
| Panasonic Lumix G G9 II Compare | 98 | 91.8 | 94.5 | 96.2 | 97.6 | 63.8 | 91.9 | 87.6 | 94.4 | 89.6 | 21.9 | 89.1 |
| OM System OM-1 Mark II Compare | 98.8 | 99.8 | 91.5 | 99.6 | 85.1 | 51.6 | 96 | 87.6 | 82.5 | 89.6 | 17.5 | 99.6 |
| Canon EOS R5 Mark II Compare | 98.8 | 96 | 94.8 | 90.5 | 98.8 | 70.1 | 90.5 | 99.6 | 33.7 | 89.6 | 9.1 | 89.1 |
価格
Value & Pricing
The Nikon ZR's value story is complicated by that $1,990 to $2,697 price spread across US listings. At the low end, you're getting a 6K RAW-capable cinema camera with a 50mm f/1.4 lens and a pile of accessories for under two grand, which is genuinely compelling. At the high end, you're paying nearly $2,700 for the same core kit, and that's a much harder sell. Shop around. The best deal in our data is on the lower end of that range, and there's no reason to pay a $700 premium for the same camera. For context, the Fujifilm X-H2S and Panasonic Lumix S5 II both offer strong video performance with far better autofocus at similar or lower prices, though neither shoots REDCODE RAW.
Price History
詳細情報
Overview
The Nikon ZR is a dedicated cinema camera that sits in a weird but interesting spot. It's not a hybrid mirrorless camera trying to do everything, it's a video-first body with a full-frame 24.5MP sensor, 6K REDCODE RAW recording, and a 4-inch articulating touchscreen. The kit we're looking at pairs it with the NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.4 and a pile of accessories, with US pricing ranging from $1,990 to $2,697 depending on the vendor and bundle. That spread alone tells you this thing is still finding its footing in the market.
If you're searching for a compact cinema camera that doesn't require a rig, cage, and external monitor just to get started, the ZR is genuinely interesting. It's small, it's light at 540g, and it brings RED color science into Nikon's Z-mount ecosystem for the first time. But it also makes some compromises that will matter a lot to certain shooters, and we'll get into those.
People ask whether the Nikon ZR is good for YouTube, indie filmmaking, or as a B-camera. The short answer is yes for all three, with caveats. The long answer is what this review is for.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Nikon ZR good for YouTube?
Yes, the ZR is well-suited for YouTube thanks to its 6K video, 32-bit float audio, and bright articulating touchscreen. However, the weak autofocus means you'll want to shoot with manual focus or keep the camera on a tripod for talking-head content.
Q: Does the Nikon ZR have a viewfinder?
No, the Nikon ZR does not have an electronic viewfinder. You compose and monitor everything through the 4-inch articulating touchscreen, which is bright at 1,000 nits but won't satisfy shooters who prefer an EVF.
Q: Can the Nikon ZR take still photos?
Yes, the ZR can shoot stills with its 24.5MP full-frame sensor, but photography is its weakest area with a score of 55.7 out of 100 in our database. It's a video-first camera, so stills are functional but not a strength.
Q: How does the Nikon ZR compare to the Sony a7R V?
The Sony a7R V is a high-resolution hybrid camera that excels at both stills and video with excellent autofocus, while the ZR is a dedicated cinema camera with REDCODE RAW but poor AF. If you need one camera for everything, the Sony is the better choice. If you want a compact RAW video tool, the ZR has an edge.
Who Should Skip This
Skip the Nikon ZR if you rely on autofocus for vlogging, event work, or solo shooting. The 9 AF points and 2nd percentile AF performance in our database make it frustrating for anything that moves unpredictably. Hybrid shooters who need strong stills performance should look at the Sony a7R V or Canon EOS R6 Mark III instead. And if you want a camera that feels premium in the hand, the plastic build and lack of a viewfinder will probably bother you. The ZR is for filmmakers who already know they want RED RAW in a small body, not for people who need a do-everything camera.
Verdict
Should you buy the Nikon ZR? If you're a Nikon shooter who wants a compact B-camera for video, or a filmmaker who values REDCODE RAW and doesn't rely on autofocus, the ZR makes a strong case at the lower end of its price range. The image quality is genuinely excellent, the stabilization is top-tier, and the battery life is best-in-class. It's a great cinema companion for someone who already owns Z-mount glass.
But if you're a solo content creator who needs reliable autofocus, or a hybrid shooter who wants one camera for photos and video, this isn't it. The AF is bad enough to be a dealbreaker for vlogging or run-and-gun work, and the lack of a viewfinder plus the plastic build make it feel less premium than the price suggests. The ZR is a specialized tool, and it's excellent at its specialty. Just don't expect it to be something it's not.
Usage Scores
- 総合80.5
- Video84.2
- Travel77.7
- Youtube83.8
- Beginner77.9
- Vlogging63.5
- Streaming67.5
- Photography68.7
- Wedding Events78.1
- Sports Wildlife67
- Product Photography77.6