Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 MACRO
A full-frame 14-28mm zoom with 0.5x macro capability at 14mm sets this lens apart, offering genuine close-up versatility in an ultra-wide design. Its compact, weather-sealed build and fluorine-coated front element make it a practical, lightweight option for shooting in challenging outdoor conditions. This lens is best for landscape and architecture photographers who also want to capture detailed close-ups without switching glass.
Nessun prezzo attuale dai rivenditori
Panoramica
The 30-Second Version
The Panasonic LUMIX S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 is a sharp, featherweight ultra-wide zoom that punches way above its price for landscapes and real estate. It takes standard 77mm filters with zero vignetting at 14mm, and the 0.5x macro capability is a genuine bonus. The slow variable aperture means low-light shooters should look elsewhere, and prices swing from USD 675 to USD 898, so shop around. If you need a daylight ultra-wide for L-Mount, this is one of the best values out there.
Pros & Cons
Pro
- Exceptional sharpness across the zoom range, rivaling Lumix primes 95th
- Only 345g with a 77mm filter thread, no bulbous front element 93rd
- 0.5x magnification at 150mm minimum focus distance 87th
- Weather-sealed with fluorine coating on the front element 80th
- No vignetting at 14mm even with a circular polarizer attached
Contro
- f/4-5.6 aperture is slow for low-light and astro work
- No optical stabilization, relies on camera IBIS
- Sunstar rendering is mediocre at best
- 7-blade diaphragm produces average bokeh
- Very little social proof, only 10 reviews in our database
Cosa dicono i proprietari
The Word on the Street
Come è cambiata l'opinione dei proprietari nel tempo
EsclusivaIn base a quando i clienti hanno effettivamente scritto le recensioni, per vedere se gli elogi iniziali sono durati.
Basato su 6 recensioni dei clienti datate, raggruppate per trimestre solare. L'analisi per periodo è in inglese.
Le prove
Performance
Sharpness is the headline here. Our database puts optical quality in the top tier for this category, and user sentiment backs that up. Multiple owners report sharp results across the entire zoom range, with minimal chromatic aberration and excellent color and contrast. That's not always a given on a budget-friendly ultra-wide. The 14 elements in 10 groups include 2 aspherical and 4 ED elements, and Panasonic clearly tuned this thing to punch above its price class.
The macro capability is a genuine bonus, not a gimmick. Minimum focus distance is 150mm, which gets you 0.5x magnification. That's not true 1:1 macro, but it's enough to get close to flowers, details, textures, and product shots. Combined with the 14mm wide end, you can create those exaggerated close-focus wide-angle shots that make small subjects look huge against their environment. The 7-blade diaphragm is nothing special for bokeh, and at f/4-5.6 you won't get creamy backgrounds anyway. But for sharp, detailed close-ups with context, it works.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 14 |
| Focal Length Max | 28 |
| Elements | 14 |
| Groups | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 |
| ED Elements | 4 |
| Coating | fluorine coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 |
| Constant | No |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.3 kg / 0.8 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 77 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 150 |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x |
vs Competition
The most obvious competitor is the Sigma Art 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II. That lens gives you a constant f/2.8 aperture and more reach, but it's heavier, more expensive, and doesn't go as wide. If you need one lens for events, portraits, and general work, the Sigma is the better call. But if you already have a mid-range zoom or primes and want a dedicated ultra-wide, the Panasonic's 14mm field of view and 345g weight are hard to beat.
Against something like the Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2, there's no contest in low light. That f/1.2 aperture gathers roughly 8 times more light than f/4. But the Viltrox is a prime, it's heavier, and it can't do 14mm. Different tools. The Canon RF 135mm f/1.8 and Sony 135mm f/1.8 GM are portrait specialists that live in a completely different world. If you're on L-Mount and want an ultra-wide zoom with macro capability, the Panasonic is basically in a class of one at this price point.
| Spec | Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 MACRO | Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE | Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 14-28mm | 24-105mm | 35mm | 50-150mm | 17-40mm | 70-180mm |
| Max Aperture | f/4-5.6 | f/2.8 | f/1.2 | f/2 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | L-Mount | Canon RF | Sony E | Sony E | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format Coverage | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | APS-C | full-frame |
| Stabilization | false | true | false | false | false | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 345 | 1315 | 910 | 1340 | 535 | 855 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | Nano USM | VCM | XD linear motors | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) | VXD |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | prime | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Prodotto | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Reach | Video | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Wide Angle | Portability | Versatility | Riscontro degli utenti | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 MACRO | 53.2 | 9.6 | 95.2 | 79.7 | 21.7 | 63.3 | 86.9 | 16.8 | 75 | 93.4 | 68.4 | 71.4 | 2 | 40.8 | 36.2 |
| Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Compare | 89.9 | 78.8 | 95.2 | 69.5 | 73.9 | 88.1 | 97.9 | 43.8 | 82 | 74.5 | 11.1 | 91.9 | 88.1 | 8.2 | 96 |
| Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE Compare | 95.4 | 69 | 90.8 | 45.3 | 29.4 | 72.3 | 92.6 | 96.1 | 82 | 53.2 | 20.5 | 33 | 88.1 | 33.4 | 36.2 |
| Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM Compare | 95.4 | 95.9 | 98.8 | 52 | 80.3 | 88.1 | 95.6 | 64.1 | 66.3 | 39.9 | 10.8 | 82.3 | 92.7 | 7.4 | 36.2 |
| Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare | 95.4 | 53.2 | 95.2 | 54.2 | 53.2 | 88.1 | 97.3 | 74.8 | 98.8 | 68.6 | 47 | 75.4 | 92.7 | 33.6 | 36.2 |
| Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 Compare | 95.4 | 86.5 | 77.4 | 75.8 | 81.2 | 84.3 | 96.5 | 43.8 | 66.3 | 29.1 | 21.7 | 77.5 | 92.7 | 27.8 | 97.4 |
Prezzo
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place right now. US listings range from USD 675 to USD 898 across 10 vendors, and that's a USD 223 spread for the same lens. If you're shopping in the US, the lower end of that range is where this lens makes the most sense. At USD 675, you're getting prime-level sharpness, weather sealing, and macro capability in a package that undercuts most premium ultra-wide zooms by hundreds. At USD 898, the value proposition gets shakier, and you should really shop around before pulling the trigger.
Canadian buyers see a similar story, with prices from CAD 898 to CAD 1,096 across 2 listings. That CAD 198 gap is worth paying attention to. The affordability percentile sits at 40th, which means this lens is not a budget bargain, but it's also not priced like a flagship. For what it delivers optically, the lower end of the price range feels like a steal. The higher end feels like you're paying a convenience tax.
Approfondisci
Overview
Panasonic's LUMIX S 14-28mm f/4-5.6 is one of those lenses that makes you wonder why more companies don't try this. It's an ultra-wide zoom for L-Mount that weighs just 345g, takes standard 77mm filters, and can focus close enough to earn a MACRO badge. That's a weird and wonderful combination. Most ultra-wides this wide force you into bulbous front elements and expensive filter systems. This one doesn't.
Who's it for? Landscape shooters who hike and don't want to lug a brick. Real estate photographers who need to make small rooms look spacious. Urban explorers who want something light on a gimbal. And anyone who's been eyeing L-Mount primes but wants more flexibility without giving up too much sharpness. The 14-28mm range covers everything from dramatic foregrounds to natural-looking environmental shots.
The catch is the aperture. f/4 at the wide end and f/5.6 by 28mm means this is not a low-light hero. If you shoot astro, events, or dim interiors handheld, you'll feel that limitation immediately. But for daylight landscapes, tripod work, and well-lit interiors, the trade-off buys you a tiny, affordable package that still delivers image quality owners keep comparing to Lumix primes.
Common Questions
Q: Can this replace my Lumix 18mm and 35mm f/1.8 primes?
For focal length coverage, yes, the 14-28mm range overlaps both of those primes. But for low light, absolutely not. The f/4-5.6 aperture gathers far less light than f/1.8, so you'd lose several stops of handheld capability in dim conditions. If you shoot mostly in daylight or on a tripod, the zoom is more flexible. If you shoot indoors or at night, keep the primes.
Q: Does it come with a lens hood?
Yes, Panasonic includes a lens hood with the LUMIX S 14-28mm. That's not always a given with budget-friendly lenses, so it's a nice touch. The hood is designed to work with the 77mm filter thread without causing vignetting at the wide end.
Q: Is this a good macro lens?
It's a good close-focus lens, but not a true macro. The 0.5x magnification at 150mm minimum focus distance lets you get close to small subjects, which is great for flowers, details, and product shots. But true macro lenses hit 1:1 magnification, which is double the reproduction ratio. If you need serious macro work, a dedicated macro lens is still the better tool.
Q: Will this work on a Leica SL2-S?
Yes. The LUMIX S 14-28mm uses the L-Mount standard, which is shared by Panasonic, Leica, and Sigma. It covers full-frame sensors, so it will work natively on the SL2-S with full autofocus and metadata communication. The weather sealing also pairs well with the SL2-S's rugged build.
Who Should Skip This
Astro and night photographers should skip this lens. The f/4-5.6 aperture means you'll be cranking ISO or dragging shutter speeds to get usable exposures in low light. You'd be better served by a fast prime like the Lumix 18mm f/1.8 or a dedicated astro lens with a wider aperture. Portrait shooters should also look elsewhere. The 21.9/100 portrait score in our database reflects the reality that ultra-wide focal lengths and slow apertures are not flattering for people photography. If you want environmental portraits with some background separation, a 35mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 prime will serve you far better. And if you need reach, this lens tops out at 28mm, which is not enough for wildlife, sports, or compressed landscape shots. A 24-70mm or 24-105mm zoom is the more versatile choice for general-purpose shooting.
Verdict
For landscape and real estate shooters, this lens is an easy recommendation. The 14mm wide end, sharp optics, light weight, and standard filter thread solve real problems that other ultra-wides create. You can throw a CPL on it without vignetting, hike with it all day, and get images that hold up against lenses costing twice as much. The weather sealing means you don't have to baby it when conditions turn.
For low-light shooters, this is not your lens. If you're doing astro, handheld night street photography, or dim event work, the f/4-5.6 aperture will frustrate you. Pair it with a fast prime like the Lumix 35mm f/1.8 for those situations, and you've got a killer two-lens kit. But as a standalone solution for everything, it falls short. Know what you're buying: a daylight ultra-wide specialist with a macro party trick, not an all-rounder.
Usage Scores
- Macro66.1
- Complessivo52
- Budget46.2
- Street58.7
- Travel49.6
- Portrait21.9
- Landscape84.5
- Professional48.8
- Video Cinema42.8
- Wildlife Sports25