Inland QN460 500GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
The 500GB Inland QN460 hits 5,300 MB/s reads and 4,000 MB/s writes with 800K IOPS, using HMB and SLC cache to keep speeds steady. Its DRAM-less design and power management features make it efficient for laptops and desktops, plus it fits a PS5. Best for budget-conscious gamers upgrading a Gen4 slot without spending extra on DRAM.
अभी किसी विक्रेता की मौजूदा कीमत नहीं है
एक नज़र में
The 30-Second Version
The QN460's 800K random read IOPS is the headline number, landing at the 85th percentile. But the 500GB capacity and 15th percentile feature score hold it back. It's a solid budget Gen4 drive with a great warranty, just don't expect any extras.
Pros & Cons
खूबियाँ
- 800K random read IOPS puts it at the 85th percentile, a standout for responsiveness 85th
- 5,300 MB/s read speed is solid Gen4 performance 74th
- 6-year warranty is generous for a budget drive 68th
- HMB and SLC caching help offset the DRAM-less design 66th
- Works in laptops, desktops, and PS5
कमियाँ
- 500GB capacity is small, 27th percentile in our database
- Feature set is bare bones at the 15th percentile
- 4,000 MB/s write speed lags behind the read speed
- Only 15 customer reviews, social proof is thin
- Portable score of 11.3 out of 100 is rough
प्रमाण
Performance
Let's talk numbers. The QN460 hits 5,300 MB/s sequential read and 4,000 MB/s write. That's respectable Gen4 territory, though the write speed is noticeably lower than the read, which is typical for DRAM-less drives. The random read IOPS of 800K is the real story here. That's an 85th percentile result, meaning it's one of the better drives on the market for random access workloads. Game loading, app launching, that kind of thing. The HMB technology borrows a chunk of your system RAM to act as a cache, which helps offset the lack of onboard DRAM.
But here's the thing. The speed score overall is 74th percentile. So while random reads are great, the drive isn't a top-tier performer across the board. The SLC cache will give you a burst of speed for smaller writes, but once that fills up, you'll see write speeds drop. For a 500GB drive, that cache is going to be smaller than what you'd get on a 1TB or 2TB model. It's fine for everyday use, but if you're moving huge files around constantly, you'll feel the ceiling.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 500 |
| Form Factor | M.2 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 5300 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 4000 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 800000 |
Hardware
| DRAM Cache | No |
Reliability
| Warranty (years) | 6 |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the QN460 has a tough fight. The Crucial T500 and Samsung 990 EVO are both more feature-rich drives with better all-around performance. The XPG GAMMIX S70 Blade and MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO are higher-end Gen4 options that will outpace the QN460 in sustained workloads. The Corsair MP700 Elite is another strong contender. Where the QN460 wins is on price and that random read performance. But with a 15th percentile feature score, it's giving up a lot of the extras that those competitors include. If you just need a basic Gen4 boot drive and don't care about DRAM or fancy features, the QN460 is a reasonable choice. But most of those competitors offer more for not much more money.
| Spec | Inland QN460 | Samsung 9100 PRO | Western Digital WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE | Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G | Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 | Crucial T500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 500GB | 4TB | 8TB | 4TB | 4TB | 2TB |
| Form Factor | M.2 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 5,300 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s |
| Nand Type | - | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | false | true | true | true | false | true |
| Endurance | - | 2400 TBW | 4800 TBW | 4000 TBW | 2400 TBW | 1200 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| उत्पाद | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | सामाजिक प्रमाण | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inland QN460 | 73.7 | 84.8 | 14.7 | 26.9 | 65.5 | 36 | 67.6 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 99.2 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 92.6 | 86 | 99.6 | 5.3 |
| Western Digital WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE Compare | 88.9 | 96.4 | 94 | 98.1 | 88.2 | 95.4 | 3.9 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G Compare | 93.3 | 94.4 | 94 | 92.6 | 94.1 | 95.4 | 9.4 |
| Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare | 99.1 | 99.2 | 89.4 | 92.6 | 86 | 77.4 | 10.8 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 94 | 96.9 | 98.9 | 78.6 | 83 | 95.4 | 19.5 |
कीमत
Value & Pricing
The price situation is a bit odd. We're seeing it at $110 USD in one listing and $212 CAD in another. Those are different currencies, so don't try to compare them directly. The affordability score is 68th percentile, which means it's not a screaming deal, but it's not overpriced either. For a 500GB Gen4 drive, you're paying a slight premium for the Inland name and the brick-and-mortar availability. The 6-year warranty does add some value, but when you look at the feature set and capacity, you're not getting a lot of extras for your money. It's a fair price, not a great one.
और पढ़ें
Overview
The Inland QN460 500GB lands in a weird spot. It's got Gen4 speeds on paper, 5,300 MB/s read and 4,000 MB/s write, which puts it at the 74th percentile for speed in our database. That's solid, but not the kind of number that makes you cancel your plans to go buy one. The random read performance is actually the highlight here at 800K IOPS, sitting at the 85th percentile, which is a standout for a budget drive. But then you look at the feature score, 15th percentile, and it's clear this thing is stripped down to the essentials. No DRAM cache, just HMB and SLC caching to keep things moving.
At 500GB, capacity is the weak link. It's in the 27th percentile, which means most people are buying bigger drives these days. The 6-year warranty is genuinely nice to see on a budget drive, and the endurance score is about average at the 66th percentile. But the social proof is thin, just 15 reviews and a 36th percentile ranking. You're not getting a lot of community validation here. It's a drive that does the basics well but doesn't have much else going for it.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Inland QN460 good for gaming?
For gaming, the QN460 is fine. The 800K random read IOPS is an 85th percentile result, which means game loading and texture streaming will feel responsive. The 5,300 MB/s read speed is also solid for Gen4. Just keep in mind the 500GB capacity will fill up fast with modern games.
Q: Does the QN460 work in a PS5?
Yes, the QN460 is listed as PS5-compatible. The 5,300 MB/s read speed meets Sony's minimum requirement of 5,500 MB/s? Actually, it's slightly below the recommended 5,500 MB/s, but many users report drives in this range working fine. The 500GB capacity is on the small side for PS5 games though.
Q: Is a DRAM-less SSD a problem?
For most everyday use, no. The QN460 uses HMB technology to borrow system RAM as a cache, which helps with performance. The 800K random read IOPS shows it can still be responsive. Where you might notice a difference is in sustained heavy writes, where the SLC cache can fill up and speeds drop.
Who Should Skip This
If you need more than 500GB of storage, look elsewhere. The capacity is in the 27th percentile, which is small by today's standards. Also, if you're doing heavy content creation or moving large files regularly, the 4,000 MB/s write speed and DRAM-less design will be a bottleneck. The portable score of 11.3 out of 100 suggests this isn't a great choice for external enclosures either. And if you like buying products with lots of community feedback, the 15 reviews here won't give you much confidence.
Verdict
The Inland QN460 500GB is a decent budget Gen4 drive with one genuinely impressive trick: that 800K random read IOPS. If you're building a cheap gaming PC or upgrading an older laptop, it'll feel snappy in day-to-day use. The 6-year warranty is a nice safety net. But the small capacity, bare-bones feature set, and thin social proof make it hard to recommend over the competition. It's a drive that does the basics well but doesn't give you a reason to choose it over the alternatives.
Usage Scores
- कुल51
- Budget68.1
- गेमिंग40
- Laptop49.7
- Console29.4
- Portable11.3
- Workstation47.1