EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 24GB GDDR6X
Dotée de 24 Go de mémoire GDDR6X et de 10 496 cœurs CUDA, cette carte excelle en ray tracing et en calcul IA grâce à une fréquence boost de 1800 MHz. Le système de refroidissement triple ventilateur HDB avec 9 capteurs iCX3 assure un fonctionnement étonnamment silencieux sous charge, complété par une plaque arrière tout en métal. Ce GPU est idéal pour les chercheurs en IA manipulant de grands modèles de langage et les créateurs 3D exigeant un rendu temps réel sans compromis.
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra is a 24GB VRAM monster that still holds its own for AI and 8K workloads, but it's showing its age for pure gaming. The 35.58 TFLOPS of compute and 936 GB/s memory bandwidth are the standout specs, while the 350W power draw and 32nd percentile efficiency are the trade-offs. US prices range from $1,875 to $2,700, so shop carefully. Buy it for the VRAM, not the frames.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- 24GB GDDR6X with 936 GB/s bandwidth is a VRAM monster for AI and 8K work 94th
- 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute puts it well above average for CUDA workloads 94th
- Thermal solution handles 350W TDP better than most, 92nd percentile cooling 92nd
- Ray tracing and DLSS support with 82 RT cores and 328 Tensor cores 89th
- EVGA build quality with iCX3 sensors and metal backplate
Points faibles
- Efficiency is rough, 32nd percentile, this card drinks power
- Affordability is a weak spot at 12th percentile, you pay for the VRAM
- Memory temps can hit 105°C under sustained load
- Requires three 8-pin PCIe power connectors, not all PSUs have that
- Rasterization performance is only 70th percentile, newer cards beat it in raw FPS
L'avis des propriétaires
The Word on the Street
L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps
ExclusivitéD'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.
D'après 36 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.
Les preuves
Performance
Let's talk numbers. The PassMark G3D score of 26,521 puts this card in the 70th percentile for rasterization performance in our database. That's solid, but it's not the chart-topper it was when it launched. Newer cards like the RTX 5090 and even some 5080 variants have pushed past it in raw gaming frames. But here's what people miss: the 24GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivering 936 GB/s of memory bandwidth is still a monster for workloads that eat VRAM for breakfast. AI inference, 8K video editing, massive 3D scenes, this card chews through them without breaking a sweat.
The compute side is where this card really flexes. With 35.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, it lands in the 83rd percentile for compute. That's well above average, and it's why this card remains popular for people doing CUDA-accelerated work. The 328 Tensor cores and 82 RT cores mean ray tracing and DLSS are fully on the table, and the ray tracing score of 81/100 backs that up. It's not the absolute best ray tracing card anymore, but it's still in the top tier of what we've tested.
The catch is thermals and power. The thermal performance sits at the 92nd percentile, which sounds great until you realize that's because EVGA had to engineer a cooling solution capable of dissipating 350W of heat. Customer reviews consistently mention memory temperatures hitting 105°C before thermal throttling kicks in. That's not a defect, it's just what happens when you push GDDR6X this hard. You'll want a case with serious airflow, and a 750W power supply is the bare minimum. Most people we've seen running this card are using 850W or higher, and some reviewers went straight to 1200W.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ampere |
| Class | consumer |
| Process | 8 |
Memory
| VRAM | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bus | 384 |
| Bandwidth | 936.2 |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 10496 |
| Tensor Cores | 328 |
| RT Cores | 82 |
| Base Clock | 1800 |
| Boost Clock | 1800 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 35.58 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 35.58 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 26521 |
| GPU Compute | 15150 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 350 |
| Recommended PSU | 750 |
| Power Connectors | Three available 8-pin or 6+2-pin PCIe power dongles |
| Cooler | Triple Fan |
| Fans | 3 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 |
| DisplayPort | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 |
Physical
| Length | 300 |
| Slot Width | 2.75 |
| Weight | 2.1 kg / 4.6 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| Upscaling | DLSS |
| AV1 Encode | No |
| VR Ready | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 |
| RGB | Yes |
vs Competition
The competitive landscape has shifted a lot since this card launched. The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5090 with 32GB of GDDR7 absolutely demolishes the 3090 in raw performance, but you're paying a massive premium for that privilege. The Gigabyte AERO RTX 5080 with 16GB is faster in rasterization and much more efficient, but it has two-thirds the VRAM. For AI workloads that need to fit large models in memory, the 3090's 24GB still gives it a real advantage over 16GB cards.
The MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti is an interesting comparison. It's newer, more efficient, and likely cheaper in most markets, but again, 16GB of VRAM. The ZOTAC APOCALYPSE RTX 5080 and Sapphire NITRO+ are also in the mix, but they're chasing the same 16GB ceiling. If your workload doesn't need more than 16GB, any of these newer cards will give you better performance per watt and better ray tracing. But if you're hitting VRAM limits, the 3090 FTW3 is still the budget-friendly way to get 24GB without jumping to a 4090 or 5090.
| Spec | EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 24GB GDDR6X | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 1800 | 2407 | 2588 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 350 | 575 | 300 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 384 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Preuve sociale | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 | 93.6 | 80.2 | 94 | 69.7 | 83.4 | 78.8 | 91.5 | 29.8 | 57.1 | 88.8 | 12.5 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.8 | 90 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.5 | 96.2 | 72.7 | 25 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD Compare | 79 | 88.1 | 85.4 | 88.6 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 73.2 | 94 | 95.5 | 21.9 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79 | 92.1 | 85.4 | 88.6 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 73.2 | 94 | 88.8 | 21.3 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85 | 97.6 | 88.5 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 58 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.4 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.8 | 96.2 | 91.6 | 83.8 | 95.5 | 84 | 91.5 | 52.9 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 19 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
Here's where things get interesting. The USD pricing on this card is all over the place, ranging from $1,875 to $2,700 across two listings. That's an $825 spread, which is frankly absurd for the same card. If you're shopping in the US, the lower end of that range is where you want to be. The CAD market is even wilder, with prices from $1,100 to $2,400, a $1,300 gap. The cheapest CAD listing is the one to hunt for if you're north of the border.
But let's be real about value. The affordability score of 63.3/100 is the weakest area for this card, and that's being generous. You're paying a premium for the 24GB of VRAM and the EVGA name. If you're purely gaming at 1440p, this card is overkill and you're burning money on electricity for frames you won't see. But if you're doing AI work, 3D rendering, or 8K video editing, that VRAM is the difference between a workflow that works and one that crashes. In that context, $1,875 for 24GB of GDDR6X is actually competitive with newer cards that charge more for less memory.
En savoir plus
Overview
The EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra is a card that refuses to be subtle. It's got 24GB of GDDR6X memory, 10,496 CUDA cores, and a 350W TDP that makes your power supply sweat just thinking about it. This is the kind of GPU you buy when you're done pretending a mid-range card is enough. It's aimed squarely at 4K gamers, 3D artists, and anyone dabbling in local AI workloads who needs that massive VRAM buffer.
What makes this particular card interesting is the FTW3 treatment. EVGA took the already absurd RTX 3090 and cranked the boost clock to 1800MHz, slapped on their iCX3 cooling tech, and added enough RGB to make a gaming rig look like a small concert venue. The triple-fan setup and metal backplate are doing real work here, not just looking pretty. This is a card built for sustained heavy loads, not quick benchmark runs.
But here's the thing. This card came out during the Ampere generation, and we're now looking at it through the lens of newer RTX 50-series cards hitting the market. The 3090 FTW3 still holds its own in a lot of ways, especially with that 24GB frame buffer, but the value proposition has shifted. You're not buying this for efficiency or affordability. You're buying it for raw capability and that sweet, sweet VRAM headroom.
Common Questions
Q: Is the RTX 3090 FTW3 still good for 4K gaming in 2025?
It's still capable, but not the best choice. The PassMark score of 26,521 puts it in the 70th percentile for rasterization, which means it'll handle most 4K games at high settings, but newer cards like the RTX 5080 will give you better frame rates with much lower power draw. If you already own one, it's fine. If you're buying new, consider whether the VRAM advantage matters for your use case.
Q: What power supply do I need for this card?
EVGA recommends a 750W PSU minimum, but real-world experience suggests going higher. The card has a 350W TDP and requires three 8-pin PCIe power connectors. Many owners report using 850W to 1200W units for stability, especially if you're running a high-end CPU alongside it. Make sure your PSU has three available 8-pin or 6+2-pin connectors before buying.
Q: Why are the memory temperatures so high on this card?
GDDR6X memory runs hot by design, and the 24GB on this card generates significant heat under load. The thermal solution is actually quite good, ranking in the 92nd percentile, but memory chips can still hit 105°C during sustained workloads like mining or rendering. This is within spec for GDDR6X, but it's worth monitoring and ensuring good case airflow.
Q: Is the 24GB VRAM worth it over a newer 16GB card?
It depends entirely on your workload. For gaming, 16GB is plenty for current titles, and newer cards with 16GB will outperform the 3090 in most games. But for AI model training, 8K video editing, or 3D rendering, that 24GB buffer is the difference between fitting a model in memory or not. If you're hitting VRAM limits on a 16GB card, the 3090 is still one of the most affordable ways to get 24GB.
Who Should Skip This
If you're a pure gamer at 1440p or 1080p, skip this card. The 350W power draw and mediocre efficiency mean you're paying a premium in electricity for performance you won't fully utilize. A newer mid-range card will give you better frames per watt and likely cost less. The rasterization performance is only 70th percentile, so you're not even getting top-tier gaming performance for your money.
Also skip it if you have an older power supply. The three 8-pin requirement is a real hurdle, and upgrading your PSU adds to the total cost. If you're building a new system from scratch, the total cost of ownership for this card, including power supply and cooling upgrades, often pushes it close to newer options that are more efficient out of the box. Look at the RTX 5080 or 5070 Ti if you want modern performance without the power headaches.
Verdict
For 4K gaming and general high-end use, the EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 is still a capable card, but it's showing its age. The rasterization performance is middle-of-the-pack by today's standards, and the power draw is punishing. If you're building a new gaming rig in 2025, you're probably better off with a newer card that gives you better frames per watt. The RTX 5080 or even a 5070 Ti will serve you better in most games.
But for AI enthusiasts, 3D artists, and anyone who needs massive VRAM on a budget, this card is still a compelling option. 24GB of GDDR6X for under $2,000 is hard to beat, especially when newer cards with comparable memory cost significantly more. The compute performance is still strong, and the EVGA build quality means these cards hold up. Just make sure you have the power supply and cooling to handle it, and shop around for the best price. That $825 spread in the US market means patience pays off.