SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Score global
vs
Samsung PM9A3 3.84TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe U.2

Samsung PM9A3 3.84TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe U.2

Samsung
57 Score global

Scores

Console
SanDisk
85
Samsung
24
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Samsung
50
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Samsung
39
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Samsung
29
Budget
SanDisk
57
Samsung
30
Portable
SanDisk
23
Samsung
16

Spécifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Samsung PM9A3
Drive
Capacity
8,000
3,840
Form FactorM.2 2280U.2
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
Pas de données
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
Pas de données
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Pas de données
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Pas de données
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Pas de données
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Pas de données
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Avantages & Inconvénients

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Samsung PM9A3 3.84TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe U.2

  • Strong capacity (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong speed (68th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile

Verdict

★ Gagnant: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Meilleur pour:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation