Nikon Z fc Silver 2022

★★★★★ 4.7 (616)
Type mirrorless
Sensor 20.9MP aps-c
AF Points 209 pts
Burst 11 fps
Video 4K @30fps
Weather Sealed Sí
Weight 390 g
Nikon Z fc Silver 2022 camera
81 Puntuación global
Precio 6385 BRL
También disponible en:

Resumen

Ventajas y desventajas

Ventajas

  • Strong connectivity (96th percentile) 96th
  • Strong burst (95th percentile) 95th
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile) 94th
  • Strong video (94th percentile) 94th

Desventajas

Opinión de los propietarios

Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo

Exclusiva

Según cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.

La opinión de los propietarios se ha mantenido estable con el tiempo
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '21: 4.9★ · 21 opinionesQ4 '21: 4.0★ · 17 opinionesQ1 '22: 4.9★ · 9 opinionesQ2 '22: 4.6★ · 10 opinionesQ3 '22: 4.6★ · 9 opinionesQ4 '22: 4.0★ · 4 opinionesQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 4 opinionesQ2 '23: 4.6★ · 8 opinionesQ3 '23: 4.9★ · 9 opinionesQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 10 opinionesQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 8 opinionesQ2 '24: 4.7★ · 6 opinionesQ3 '24: 4.5★ · 2 opinionesQ4 '24: 4.6★ · 5 opinionesQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 4 opinionesQ2 '25: 4.9★ · 9 opinionesQ3 '25: 4.3★ · 9 opinionesQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 8 opinionesQ1 '26: 4.8★ · 8 opinionesQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 5 opinionesQ3 '26: 5.0★ · 3 opiniones2117910944891086254998853Q3 '21Q1 '22Q3 '22Q1 '23Q3 '23Q1 '24Q3 '24Q1 '25Q3 '25Q1 '26Q3 '26
Valoración mediaSatisfechos (4-5★)Insatisfechos (1-2★)Altura de la barra = número de opiniones
  1. Q3 202396/1004.9★9 opiniones

    Buyers in Q3 2023 praised the camera's image quality, retro design, ease of use, and lightweight build. One noted potential discomfort for larger hands.

    • Excellent image quality, even pre-edit, and great value for beginners.
    • Retro design and lightweight body praised for portability and aesthetics.
    • Easy to learn and operate, with intuitive top dials for settings.
    • One reviewer noted possible discomfort for larger hands, suggesting an optional grip.
  2. Q2 202388/1004.6★8 opiniones

    Buyers praised the camera's image quality, weight, and design, though one beginner found it challenging and not ideal for novices.

    • Excellent image and video quality, with vibrant colors and sharp photos.
    • Lightweight and portable, ideal for travel and outdoor adventures.
    • Intuitive controls with extra dials for quick adjustments, appreciated by users.
    • Not recommended for beginners due to a learning curve and limited initial stock.
  3. Q1 202396/1005.0★4 opiniones

    Buyers praised the camera's hybrid controls, autofocus, build quality, and 4K video. It was seen as a capable backup for professional work and a good learning tool for photography.

    • Hybrid digital/analog controls praised for intuitive autofocus and customizable manual settings.
    • Build quality and sturdiness noted, with one user finding it handles like a 35mm without bulk.
    • 4K video and photo quality impressed a professional user, using it as a backup in harsh conditions.
    • Ease of use and learning curve appreciated, suitable for beginners wanting to move beyond Auto mode.
  4. Q4 202265/1004.0★4 opiniones

    Buyers praised the retro design and image quality, but some found the controls tricky and the camera geared toward vloggers.

    • Retro design is loved and described as an eye-catcher.
    • Image quality and features exceed expectations for a travel camera.
    • Controls with knobs and dials are fun but take time to learn.
    • Camera is geared toward vlog/influencer crowd, not for all users.
  5. Q3 202278/1004.6★9 opiniones

    Buyers praised the retro design, image quality, and ease of use, but some criticized the lack of a grip, limited manual controls, and lower resolution compared to DSLRs.

    • Retro design and aesthetics are widely loved, evoking nostalgia and encouraging use.
    • Image quality is praised, with users noting amazing results and compatibility with existing lenses.
    • Ergonomics criticized: no grip makes it slippery and hard to hold, causing hand cramps during long shoots.
    • Manual controls: some love the dials, but others find adjustments limited to touchscreen, hindering manual shooting.
  6. Q2 202278/1004.6★10 opiniones

    Buyers in this period praised the Zfc's retro design, portability, and image quality, but noted battery life, kit lens limitations, and ergonomic issues.

    • Retro design and build quality praised; described as fun, lightweight, and a modern update to classic Nikon.
    • Kit lens quality criticized for vignetting and low-light performance; third-party or better lenses recommended.
    • Battery life disappoints; drains quickly compared to DSLRs, requiring extra batteries.
    • Controls and ergonomics divisive; dials stylish but not practical, and some find handling less intuitive than Z50.
  7. Q1 202296/1004.9★9 opiniones

    Buyers in Q1 2022 praised the Z fc's retro design, ease of use with physical dials, and image quality. They noted the need for a grip for comfortable handling and minor issues with small knobs and lens flare.

    • Retro design and physical dials are loved for easy, quick control without menus.
    • Image quality is sharp with pleasing colors, and 4K video has a film-like feel.
    • Camera body is awkward to hold; a third-party grip is recommended for extended use.
    • Some small knobs are hard to turn, and the 28mm lens has sloppy flare and imperfect bokeh.
  8. Q4 202170/1004.0★17 opiniones

    Buyers praised the retro design, image quality, and autofocus, but noted flash incompatibility, lack of IBIS, and dust issues.

    • Retro design and nostalgic feel widely loved.
    • Flash incompatibility with non-SB-5000 speed lights.
    • No IBIS; some users accept it, others need gimbal.
    • Dust on sensor due to no electrostatic cleaner.
  9. Q3 202195/1004.9★21 opiniones

    Buyers love the retro design and nostalgic feel, praising it as a fun, everyday camera. Some note the plastic build and lack of IBIS, but overall sentiment is highly positive.

    • Retro design and nostalgic feel reminiscent of classic film cameras.
    • Compact, lightweight, and fun to use for everyday photography.
    • Plastic build quality, especially battery door, feels cheap to some.
    • Lack of IBIS and crop sensor noted as limitations by some users.

Basado en 168 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.

Las pruebas

Rendimiento

Percentiles de rendimiento

AF 83.6
EVF 89.8
Build 92.4
Burst 95.2
Video 94.2
Sensor 84.5
Battery 46.4
Display 86.9
Connectivity 95.7
Valoración social 94.3
Stabilization 35.4

Especificaciones

Especificaciones completas

Sensor

Type CMOS
Size aps-c
Megapixels 20.9 MP
ISO Range 100
Processor EXPEED 6

Autofocus

AF Points 209
AF Type Phase Detection: 209
Eye AF Yes
Animal AF Yes
Subject Detection Yes

Shooting

Burst (Mechanical) 11
Burst (Electronic) 120
Max Shutter 1/4000
Electronic Shutter Yes

Video

Max Resolution 4K
4K FPS 30
1080p FPS 120
10-bit No
Log Profile No
RAW Video No
Codec H.264/MOV/MP4

Display & EVF

Screen Size 3"
Touchscreen Yes
Articulating Yes
EVF Resolution 2.36 M dots

Build

Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs
Battery Life 300

Connectivity

Wi-Fi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
USB USB-C
HDMI Micro-HDMI
Hot Shoe Yes

Frente a la competencia

Spec Nikon Z fc Fujifilm X-H2S Sony a1 II Canon EOS R6 Mark III Panasonic Lumix S S5 II Pentax K-3 Mark III
Type mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless DSLR
Sensor 20.9MP aps-c 26.2MP aps-c 50.1MP full-frame 32.5MP full-frame 24.2MP full-frame 25.7MP aps-c
AF Points 209 425 759 1053 779 101
Burst FPS 11 40 30 40 30 12
Video 4K @30fps 6K @120fps 8K @120fps 8K @120fps 6K @60fps 4K @30fps
IBIS false true true true true true
Weather Sealed true true true true true true
Weight (g) 390 579 658 609 658 735
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Producto AFEVFBuildBurstVideoSensorBatteryDisplayValoración socialStabilization
Nikon Z fc 83.689.892.495.294.284.546.486.994.335.4
Fujifilm X-H2S Compare 89.496.89593.59896.898.299.194.395.2
Sony a1 II Compare 96.198.896.491.49972.993.399.69899.5
Canon EOS R6 Mark III Compare 98.790.695.593.598.663.697.199.194.399.5
Panasonic Lumix S S5 II Compare 97.690.896.491.494.654.491.899.494.388.3
Pentax K-3 Mark III Compare 79.981.697.477.960.393.798.863.374.688.3

Precio

Relación calidad-precio

Desde 6385 BRL 1 oferta en 1 tienda
Amazon 1 oferta Desde 6385 BRL

Price History

6200 BRL 6400 BRL 6600 BRL 6800 BRL 7000 BRL 18 jul22 oct 6385 BRL

Puntuaciones por uso

General (80.8)Video (79.4)Travel (82.9)Youtube (83.2)Beginner (84)Vlogging (81.7)Streaming (84.2)Photography (80.2)Wedding Events (81.5)Sports Wildlife (83.1)Product Photography (84.4)

Pronto habrá un análisis completo. Las especificaciones, puntuaciones, precios y gráficos de arriba siempre están actualizados.

Otras configuraciones4

Productos similares