Sigma 723-306 135-400mm

★★★★☆ 4.3 (8)

A 135-400mm f/4.5-5.6 zoom lens with 1 aspherical and 3 ED elements delivers super-telephoto reach in a compact 104-gram body. Its minimal weight makes it practical for all-day handheld shooting without the bulk of typical telephoto zooms. It’s best for street photographers needing a discreet, lightweight super-telephoto lens for candid captures.

Focal length 135-400mm
Aperture f/4.5
Mount Nikon F
Weight 104 g
lens type zoom
Sigma 723-306 135-400mm lens
53 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

A tank-built 400mm zoom for Nikon F that's sharp enough but shaky without stabilization. Buy it for the reach, not the image quality.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Excellent build quality, 95th percentile 95th
  • Serious 400mm reach for the price 81st
  • APO design with 3 ED elements helps control fringing
  • Works on older Nikon F-mount SLRs

Cons

  • No stabilization at 400mm is a recipe for blurry shots
  • Macro performance is nearly dead last
  • Optical quality is just average
  • Only 4 customer reviews, so real-world data is thin

The proof

Performance

The aperture range of f/4.5-5.6 is solidly middle of the pack, and the 135-400mm focal range gives you real reach for wildlife or airshows. The 3 ED elements and 1 aspherical element should help with chromatic aberration and edge sharpness, but the optical score lands at the 52nd percentile, so don't expect modern prime-level clarity. The lack of stabilization is a real problem at 400mm. You'll need fast shutter speeds or a tripod, especially on older Nikon bodies without IBIS. The autofocus is also just average, which on an older screw-drive or early AF lens can feel sluggish by today's standards.

Performance Percentiles

AF 53.8
Bokeh 59.8
Build 94.7
Macro 61.2
Optical 60.3
Aperture 60.2
Versatility 81.2
Social Proof 24.8
Stabilization 34.3

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 135
Focal Length Max 400
Groups 5
Aspherical Elements 1
ED Elements 3
Coating specially coated to get the best color balance whilst cutting down on ghosting

Aperture

Max Aperture f/4.5
Min Aperture 4.5-5.6
Constant No

Build

Mount Nikon F
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs

Focus

Min Focus Distance 400

vs Competition

Against the Tamron 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD, the Sigma gives you more reach but loses stabilization and modern optical coatings. The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is a completely different beast, wider and stabilized, but it won't mount on Nikon F without an adapter and tops out at 135mm. The Nikon Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is sharper and faster but covers a totally different focal range. If you're on Nikon F and want 400mm on a budget, the Sigma is one of the few options at this price, but the Tamron is the smarter all-rounder if you can adapt it.

Spec Sigma 723-306 135-400mm Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Focal Length 135-400mm 28-300mm 18-55mm 12-35mm 18-135mm 28-70mm
Max Aperture f/4.5 f/4 f/3.5 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/2.8
Mount Nikon F Sony E Nikon F Micro Four Thirds Sony E Canon RF
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false true false true false true
Weight (g) 104 590 205 306 326 495
AF Type - VXD linear motor pulse stepping motor Autofocus Linear motor STM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Sigma 723-306 135-400mm 53.859.894.761.260.360.281.224.834.3
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare 97.783.862.883.296.271.197.95079.3
Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Compare 84.581.683.695.454.482.982.88192.3
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare 53.886.883.848.985.988.480.486.296.4
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 97.781.670.737.377.782.995.890.879.3
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare 84.586.870.241.583.688.476.952.898.4

Price

Value & Pricing

At $600 USD, this is a tough sell unless you specifically need a budget 400mm for an old Nikon DSLR or film body. The build quality is genuinely great, but you're paying for reach and durability, not optical excellence. If you can live without the 400mm end, there are sharper, stabilized options in this price range.

Read more

Overview

The Sigma 723-306 is a weird one. It's a 135-400mm f/4.5-5.6 zoom for Nikon F mount that weighs just 104g, which is frankly absurd for a lens with this reach. That weight figure is almost certainly wrong or refers to something else, because a full-frame 400mm zoom made of glass and metal cannot weigh less than a candy bar. What we can say is this is an old-school APO Aspherical design with 3 ED elements, and it's built for Nikon SLRs, not mirrorless. The build quality ranks in the 95th percentile, which tracks for Sigma's older EX-era lenses. But the optical performance sits right around average, and the macro capability is one of the worst we've seen.

Common Questions

Q: Will this lens work on a Nikon DSLR?

Yes, it's designed for Nikon F mount SLRs. It should work on most Nikon DSLRs, but check your body's compatibility with older Sigma lenses, some newer bodies can have aperture control issues.

Q: Is this lens good for wildlife photography?

The 400mm reach is great for wildlife, but the lack of stabilization means you'll need a tripod or very fast shutter speeds. The autofocus is also just average, so fast-moving animals might be frustrating.

Q: Does this lens have image stabilization?

No. There's no optical stabilization, so you'll need to rely on your camera body's IBIS if it has one, or shoot with a tripod at the long end.

Who Should Skip This

If you want a sharp, stabilized all-rounder for travel or street photography, this isn't it. The macro score is abysmal, the stabilization is missing, and the optical quality is just okay. Go grab a Tamron 28-300mm VC or a used Nikon 70-300mm VR instead. You'll lose a bit of reach but gain a lot of usability.

Verdict

The Sigma 723-306 is a niche lens for a specific buyer: someone with an older Nikon F-mount body who wants 400mm reach without spending four figures. The build is fantastic, but the average optics, missing stabilization, and terrible macro score make it a one-trick pony. If that trick is your trick, go for it. Otherwise, keep looking.

Usage Scores

Macro (52.9)Overall (52.5)Budget (47.7)Street (62.3)Travel (58.4)Portrait (55.1)Landscape (48.3)Professional (49.2)Video Cinema (45.9)Wildlife Sports (46.5)

Similar Products