Nikon 2146
The 200-400mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S VR zoom lens combines four super-telephoto primes into one compact unit, with VR offering a 3-stop shutter speed advantage and a Silent Wave Motor for quiet, accurate autofocus. Its four ED glass elements minimize chromatic aberration, and it accepts TC-14E II, TC-17E II, and TC-20E II teleconverters, though AF works only with the TC-14E II. Best for sports, action, bird, and wildlife photographers who need a versatile handheld zoom in challenging light, despite its 3275g weight and lack of weather sealing.
No current retailer price
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Nikon 200-400mm f/4G is a heavy, specialized lens for wildlife and sports shooters. VR is the standout feature, but optical quality and build rank near the bottom of our database. At $2,700 USD, it's only worth it if you absolutely need 400mm of reach.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- VR gives you about three stops of handheld flexibility 72nd
- Silent Wave Motor autofocus is fast and quiet 71st
- Constant f/4 aperture across the whole zoom range 70th
- Four ED elements keep chromatic aberration in check
Cons
- Weighs 3,275g, your arms will hate you
- No weather sealing on a lens clearly aimed at outdoor shooters
- Optical quality ranks near the bottom of our database
- Macro performance is one of the worst we've seen
The proof
Performance
Autofocus is quick and quiet thanks to the Silent Wave Motor, landing right around the middle of the pack in our database. The VR system is the real star here, giving you roughly three stops of stabilization, which matters a lot at 400mm. But the optical score is a weak spot, sitting near the bottom of the charts. Bokeh is solid, and the f/4 aperture is above average for this class, but macro performance is basically nonexistent. Minimum focus distance is 6.2 feet, so don't expect to get close to anything small.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 200 |
| Focal Length Max | 400 |
Aperture
| Min Aperture | f/4 |
Build
| Weight | 3.3 kg / 7.2 lbs |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the Nikon 200-400mm is a specialist. The Tamron 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VC is far more versatile and lighter, but you lose the constant aperture and the long end reach. The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is a better everyday lens with stabilization, but it can't touch 400mm. The Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM is sharper and faster, but again, no reach. If you need 400mm, nothing else in this list gets you there. If you don't, almost everything else is easier to live with.
| Spec | Nikon 2146 | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 200-400mm | 28-300mm | 12-35mm | 17-40mm | 18-135mm | 28-70mm |
| Max Aperture | - | f/4 | f/2.8 | f/1.8 | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | - | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds | Fujifilm X | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | false | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 3275 | 590 | 306 | 535 | 326 | 495 |
| AF Type | - | VXD linear motor | Autofocus | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) | Linear motor | STM |
| Lens Type | - | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon 2146 | 53.8 | 70 | 0.2 | 12 | 17.6 | 71.1 | 71.6 | 34.3 |
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare | 97.7 | 83.8 | 62.8 | 83.2 | 96.2 | 71.1 | 97.9 | 79.3 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.8 | 86.8 | 83.8 | 48.9 | 85.9 | 88.4 | 80.4 | 96.4 |
| Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare | 53.8 | 97.1 | 67 | 72.3 | 96.6 | 95.4 | 75.6 | 34.3 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 97.7 | 81.6 | 70.7 | 37.3 | 77.7 | 82.9 | 95.8 | 79.3 |
| Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare | 84.5 | 86.8 | 70.2 | 41.5 | 83.6 | 88.4 | 76.9 | 98.4 |
Price
Value & Pricing
At $2,700 USD, this lens is a big investment. You're paying for the focal range and the VR system, not optical perfection. If you shoot wildlife or sports and need 400mm of reach with a constant aperture, it earns its keep. But if you're a generalist looking for a do-it-all lens, this is a lot of money for something that scores 37.5 out of 100 for budget friendliness.
Read more
Overview
The Nikon 200-400mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S VR is a serious piece of glass for wildlife and sports shooters. It packs Nikon's Vibration Reduction, a Silent Wave Motor, and four ED elements into a 3,275g body that demands a monopod or tripod. This is not a casual walkaround lens.
It's built for reach and speed, not versatility. The 200-400mm range covers a lot of ground for action photography, and the constant f/4 aperture keeps things predictable. But the lack of weather sealing and the sheer weight mean you need to plan your shoots around it.
Common Questions
Q: Can I use teleconverters with this lens?
Yes, it's compatible with the Nikon TC-14E II, TC-17E II, and TC-20E II. But autofocus only works with the TC-14E II, so plan on manual focus with the others.
Q: Is this lens weather sealed?
No, it's not weather sealed. For a lens aimed at outdoor wildlife and sports shooters, that's a real drawback if you're working in rain or dust.
Q: How close can I focus?
The minimum focus distance is 6.2 feet at all focal lengths. That's fine for large subjects at a distance, but it's not a lens for close-up work.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need a lens you can carry all day or shoot in bad weather. The 3,275g weight and lack of weather sealing make it a poor fit for travel, street, or casual shooting. If you want macro or close-up capability, look elsewhere, because this lens scores 11.9 out of 100 for macro and can't focus closer than 6.2 feet.
Verdict
This lens is for wildlife and sports photographers who need 400mm of reach and can handle the weight. The VR system and constant f/4 aperture make it a capable tool for action, but the lack of weather sealing and mediocre optical performance mean it's not for everyone. If you're shooting birds or athletes from a distance, it's worth a look. If you're shooting anything else, keep scrolling.
