Blackmagic Design CINECAMPOCHDMFT4K
Snapshot
Pros & Cons
Pros
Cons
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (28th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
The proof
Performance
Specifications
Full Specifications
Build
| Weight | 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs |
vs Competition
| Spec | Blackmagic Design CINECAMPOCHDMFT4K | Fujifilm X-H2S | Sony A9 III | Panasonic LUMIX GH7 | Nikon Z Z8 | Canon EOS R R3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | - | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | - | 26.2MP aps-c | 24.6MP full-frame | 25.2MP micro-four-thirds | 45.7MP full-frame | 24.1MP full-frame |
| AF Points | - | 425 | 759 | 315 | 493 | 1053 |
| Burst FPS | - | 40 | 120 | 75 | 120 | 12 |
| Video | - | 6K @120fps | 4K @120fps | 6K @120fps | 8K @120fps | 6K @120fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 695 | 579 | 617 | 721 | 907 | 822 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackmagic Design CINECAMPOCHDMFT4K | 35.3 | 38.1 | 51.4 | 31.9 | 23.2 | 29 | 46 | 28 | 18.1 | 34.2 |
| Fujifilm X-H2S Compare | 89.3 | 96.1 | 93.6 | 92.6 | 97.4 | 96.9 | 98.3 | 98.8 | 94.3 | 94.7 |
| Sony A9 III Compare | 96.3 | 98.8 | 94.7 | 99.8 | 89.9 | 60.2 | 92.1 | 85.4 | 94.3 | 98.4 |
| Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Compare | 86.6 | 88.9 | 96.5 | 94.6 | 97.1 | 61.5 | 90.4 | 85.4 | 94.3 | 96.5 |
| Nikon Z Z8 Compare | 91.3 | 93.6 | 86.9 | 99.8 | 98.6 | 69.9 | 90.1 | 85.4 | 94.3 | 92.5 |
| Canon EOS R R3 Compare | 98.9 | 95.1 | 97.5 | 83.2 | 95.9 | 51.4 | 46 | 85.4 | 94.3 | 86.7 |
Price
Value & Pricing
Amazon.com.br 1 offer From R$12,344
Price History
Usage Scores
A full written review is coming soon. The specs, scores, prices and charts above are always up to date.