Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III Black 2018
The lightweight 366g body packs a 20MP Micro Four Thirds sensor, 5-stop IBIS, and full weather sealing, making it an exceptionally tough travel companion. Its 4K video recording and dependable stabilization deliver smooth handheld footage in a package that won't weigh down your bag. This camera suits travel photographers and outdoor video creators who need a rugged, portable system without sacrificing core image quality.
No current retailer price
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The E-M5 Mark III packs best-in-class stabilization and weather sealing into a 414g body that's perfect for travel. The plastic build and fragile tripod mount are real concerns, and video is just average. At the low end of the used market around USD 665, it's a fantastic deal. At full price, you're better off with a Sony a6700.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Stabilization is absurdly good, 6.5 stops means sharp handheld shots in near darkness 95th
- 414g with weather sealing makes it a genuine travel workhorse 91st
- 121 cross-type phase-detect points deliver reliable, fast autofocus 90th
- Battery life beats most mirrorless cameras in this size class 88th
Cons
- Plastic body feels cheap and the tripod mount has a documented cracking problem
- Menu system is a labyrinth that even Olympus fans complain about
- No USB-C port in a camera this recent is just annoying
- Video is middle of the pack, no headphone jack kills it for serious shooters
What owners think
The Word on the Street
How owner sentiment changed over time
ExclusiveBased on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.
- Q3 202372/100
Buyers praised image quality, size, and stabilization, but noted menu navigation issues with bright green highlights and AF tracking limitations for fast action.
- Good image quality, perfect body size, and easy navigation overall.
- Lightweight with stabilization and internal stacking, ideal for street photography.
- Menu highlights in bright green are hard to see in bright light, but livable.
- AF tracking couldn't keep up with speeding race cars; zone focusing needed.
- Q2 202388/100
Buyers praised the camera's image stabilization, image quality, and portability. One noted the build feels less premium than the Mark II but still nice, while others found controls intuitive and the camera easy to use.
- In-body stabilization delivers crisp images, even for long handheld exposures.
- Image quality and compact size are highlights, with one buyer enjoying both.
- Controls are fast and intuitive once mastered; camera is easy to use.
- Build feels less premium than the Mark II but still nice to hold and use.
- Q3 202233/100
Buyers praise image quality and compactness but report reliability issues like shutter failure and baseplate cracking, plus poor manuals and menus. Trust in the brand has diminished.
- Shutter/IS failure after 13 months, costly repair; baseplate cracks around tripod socket, not covered by warranty.
- Excellent image quality and compact size, but reliability concerns and poor customer service response to defects.
- Poor manual and confusing menus; some settings require multiple menu sections, and custom modes are hard to access.
- Downgrades from previous models: micro USB instead of USB-C, no settings save/restore in Workspace, no tethering in Capture.
- Q2 202262/100
Buyers praise the light weight, ergonomics, and IBIS, but note missing features like webcam streaming and hard copy manual, plus a few zero-star reviews that are actually positive.
- Light weight and compact size praised as ideal for travel and daily use.
- IBIS superior to competitors, enabling handheld shots down to 2 seconds.
- Cannot stream video for web conferencing, unlike the Mark II.
- No hard copy manual and missing eyecup disappoint some buyers.
- Q4 202195/100
Buyers praised the camera's light weight, compact size, image quality, and advanced features like bracketing and raw shooting. Some noted a learning curve and sparse manual, but overall satisfaction was high.
- Lightweight and compact design praised by multiple buyers, ideal for travel and replacing heavier DSLRs.
- Image quality and enlargement capability up to 20x24 crops satisfied a former pro photographer.
- Advanced features like bracketing, sequential shooting, raw/jpeg, and sophisticated focusing were valued.
- Manual is basic; buyers needed online resources or planned to buy a book, indicating a learning curve.
- Q3 202183/100
Buyers praised the camera's compact size, light weight, image quality, and suitability for travel and wildlife. One reported a defective unit and had to pay return shipping.
- Compact and lightweight design praised as ideal for travel and walk-around use.
- Excellent image quality, including low-light and wildlife shots, with great stabilization.
- One defective unit received; buyer had to pay return shipping, raising quality concerns.
- Solid build with dust and splash proofing, suitable for damp conditions.
- Q2 202167/100
Buyers praised the camera's compact size, image quality, and controls, but some reported defects: a cracked tripod mount and a defective kit lens. Overall, sentiment is positive but tempered by these reliability issues.
- Compact, lightweight body ideal for travel and hiking; users appreciate the portability and image quality.
- Tripod mount flexes and can crack, causing instability with heavier lenses; a notable design flaw.
- One kit lens (12-45 Pro) was defective out of the box, showing a 'check lens' error and focus issues.
- Excellent controls, dials, and build quality; 4K video and stabilizer are praised.
- Q1 2021100/100
All five reviewers in Q1 2021 praised the camera's compact size, image stabilization, and image quality, recommending it for travel and outdoor use.
- Compact and lightweight design praised as ideal for travel and hiking, easy to carry.
- Image stabilization (IBIS) highlighted as impressive, aiding sharp photos and low-light shots.
- Image quality, especially JPEGs and low-light performance, exceeded expectations.
- Ease of use and abundant features appreciated, suitable for various skill levels.
- Q4 202072/100
Buyers praised the camera's size, image quality, autofocus, stabilization, and value, especially for video. Some noted a less solid body and plasticky kit lens, while one reviewer gave a low rating despite positive comments.
- Compact, lightweight body with excellent image quality, autofocus, and stabilization, offering pro-level video at a reasonable price.
- Body feels less solid than predecessor; kit lens is sharp but plasticky, a step back in build quality.
- Highly customizable and easy to use for beginners, with auto and scene modes, plus a huge lens selection.
- One reviewer's old 4/3 lenses require an adapter and lose continuous autofocus, though they were happy after buying new lenses.
- Q2 202090/100
Buyers in Q2 2020 praised the E-M5 Mark III for its lightweight, weather-sealed body, image quality, and features like dual IS and articulating screen. Some noted a steep learning curve and criticized the menu system and manual.
- Lightweight, weather-sealed, and ergonomic body with excellent image quality and features like dual IS and articulating screen.
- Learning curve is manageable but menus and manual are non-intuitive; users rely on external resources.
- Fast, accurate autofocus with 121-point phase detect, plus advanced features like Hi-Res Shot and Pro Capture.
- Great value, especially with discounts, and a worthy upgrade from older models or other brands.
- Q1 202096/100
Buyers in Q1 2020 praised the E-M5 Mark III as a compact, lightweight camera with excellent image quality, IBIS, and autofocus, often calling it a mini E-M1 II. Minor complaints included plastic build, lack of Olympus Capture support, and USB charging limitations.
- Compact and lightweight body, often described as a mini E-M1 II, ideal for travel and street photography.
- Excellent image quality, IBIS, and autofocus performance, with several users noting significant upgrades from older models.
- Plastic construction initially felt cheap but was generally accepted as sturdy and well-built after use.
- Lack of Olympus Capture software support and USB charging limitations were noted as drawbacks.
- Q4 201991/100
Buyers in this period praised the E-M5 III as a compact, feature-rich upgrade with excellent stabilization, controls, and build quality. Minor complaints included lack of panorama stitching and battery size concerns.
- Compact size and ergonomics praised; comfortable balance with lenses, well-laid-out controls.
- Feature set and performance lauded: 20MP sensor, AF improvements, weatherproofing, and stabilization.
- Upgrade value highlighted from older models like E-M5 II, E-M10 II, and Pen-F.
- Missing in-camera panorama stitching noted; battery size concerns mentioned but not widely experienced.
Based on 83 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.
The proof
Performance
The stabilization is the star here. At the 94th percentile in our database, it's genuinely best-in-class. You can hand-hold shots at shutter speeds that would turn other cameras into abstract art. The 10fps mechanical burst is solid, and the 30fps electronic mode is there when you need it, though rolling shutter can bite with fast subjects. Autofocus sits at the 81st percentile, which means it's strong but not class-leading. Eye AF works well for portraits, but it's not going to out-track a Sony a6700. Video lands right at the 60th percentile. 4K at 30fps is fine for casual clips, but no headphone jack and no USB-C in 2024 feels like Olympus just forgot. Battery life is actually a bright spot at the 91st percentile, which surprises a lot of people given the size.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Sensor
| Type | MOS |
| Size | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 20.4 MP |
| ISO Range | 200 |
| Processor | TruePic VIII |
Autofocus
| AF Points | 121 |
| AF Type | Phase Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121 |
| Eye AF | Yes |
| Animal AF | No |
| Subject Detection | No |
Shooting
| Burst (Mechanical) | 10 |
| Burst (Electronic) | 30 |
| Max Shutter | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | Yes |
Video
| Max Resolution | 4K |
| 4K FPS | 30 |
| 1080p FPS | 60 |
| 10-bit | No |
| Log Profile | No |
| RAW Video | No |
| Codec | H.264/MOV |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 3" |
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Articulating | Yes |
| EVF Resolution | 2.36 M dots |
Build
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs |
| Battery Life | 310 |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| USB | Micro-USB (USB 2.0) |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | Yes |
vs Competition
Against the Sony a6700, the Olympus wins on stabilization and portability but loses on autofocus tracking and video features. The a6700 has better subject detection and a proper headphone jack. The Fujifilm X-H2 is a different beast entirely, bigger sensor, higher resolution, but it's also bigger and heavier. The Panasonic S5 II brings full-frame image quality and excellent video, but you're giving up the compact size that makes the E-M5 Mark III special. The Nikon Z5 II splits the difference on sensor size but can't match the Olympus stabilization. For pure travel photography, the Olympus still holds its own. For hybrid shooters who split time between stills and video, the Sony or Panasonic make more sense.
| Spec | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III | Sony Cinema Line FX30 | Nikon Z Z9 | Fujifilm X-H2 | Panasonic Lumix G G9 II | OM System OM-1 Mark II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | mirrorless | cinema | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | 20.4MP micro-four-thirds | 26MP aps-c | 45.7MP full-frame | 40.2MP aps-c | 25.2MP micro-four-thirds | 20.4MP micro-four-thirds |
| AF Points | 121 | 759 | 493 | 425 | 779 | 1053 |
| Burst FPS | 10 | 120 | 30 | 15 | 75 | 120 |
| Video | 4K @30fps | 4K @120fps | 8K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 4K @120fps | 4K @60fps |
| IBIS | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 414 | 646 | 1160 | 579 | 575 | 511 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | User Sentiment | Connectivity | Social Proof | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III | 85.2 | 82.4 | 78 | 82.4 | 63 | 51.6 | 90.1 | 33.7 | 91.3 | 85.2 | 45.1 | 94.6 |
| Sony Cinema Line FX30 Compare | 97 | 87.7 | 95.7 | 99.6 | 92.3 | 95.4 | 96.7 | 82.5 | 96.1 | 94.3 | 16.9 | 89.1 |
| Nikon Z Z9 Compare | 93.6 | 91.9 | 99.4 | 95.4 | 98.8 | 70.9 | 98.1 | 98.4 | 96.1 | 94.3 | 8.7 | 89.1 |
| Fujifilm X-H2 Compare | 92.4 | 96.9 | 94.7 | 82.4 | 95.4 | 99 | 97.8 | 82.5 | 96.1 | 89.6 | 23.8 | 95.9 |
| Panasonic Lumix G G9 II Compare | 98 | 91.7 | 94.6 | 96.2 | 97.6 | 63.9 | 91.9 | 94.3 | 96.1 | 89.6 | 21.9 | 89.1 |
| OM System OM-1 Mark II Compare | 98.8 | 99.8 | 91.5 | 99.6 | 85.2 | 51.6 | 95.9 | 82.5 | 96.1 | 89.6 | 17.4 | 99.6 |
Price
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place. US listings run from USD 665 to USD 1,500, and Canadian prices swing from CAD 957 to CAD 2,800. At the low end, this is a steal. You're getting stabilization and weather sealing that rival cameras costing twice as much. At the high end, you're paying new-camera money for a used body with a known build flaw. Shop around. The cheapest US listings are where the value actually lives. If you're paying over USD 900, you should be looking at a Fujifilm X-H2 or a Sony a6700 instead.
Read more
Overview
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III is the camera you grab when you want pro features without the pro backpack. It squeezes a 20.4MP sensor, 121-point phase-detect autofocus, and 6.5 stops of stabilization into a 414g body that actually fits in a jacket pocket. Weather sealing means you don't have to baby it when the sky opens up mid-hike.
But here's the thing. The spec sheet reads like a mini E-M1 Mark II, and mostly it delivers. The catch is the build. Olympus swapped the metal body for plastic, and owners have reported cracked tripod mounts. That's a real trade-off for the weight savings, and it's the one thing that keeps this from being a no-brainer.
Common Questions
Q: Is the tripod mount really that fragile?
Yes, this is the most reported build issue. Several owners have had the mount crack when using heavier lenses or quick-release plates. Use a small plate and avoid hanging heavy setups off the tripod socket.
Q: How does the autofocus handle moving subjects?
The 121 cross-type phase-detect points are solid for most situations, and Eye AF works well for portraits. But it's not in the same league as Sony's real-time tracking, so fast action shooters may find it frustrating.
Q: Is this good for video?
It shoots 4K at 30fps and the stabilization helps a lot for handheld footage. But there's no headphone jack for monitoring audio, and the lack of USB-C limits external recording options. Casual video is fine, serious video work is not.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you shoot video seriously. No headphone jack, no USB-C, and middle-of-the-pack video quality make it a poor choice for vloggers or hybrid shooters. Also skip it if you're rough on gear or use heavy lenses on a tripod regularly. The plastic body and fragile tripod mount are not built for abuse. If you need a workhorse that can take a beating, get a Fujifilm X-H2 or a used E-M1 Mark II with its metal body.
Verdict
Buy this if you want a tiny camera that punches way above its weight for stills. Travel photographers, street shooters, and hikers will love the stabilization and weather sealing. The image quality from that 20.4MP sensor is genuinely good, and the portability means you'll actually take it with you. Just be gentle with the tripod mount, and budget time to learn the menus. If you need serious video or you're rough on gear, look elsewhere.
Usage Scores
- Overall77.3
- Video78.1
- Travel83.3
- Youtube73.8
- Beginner88.5
- Vlogging76.5
- Streaming75.8
- Photography76.3
- Wedding Events78.9
- Sports Wildlife77.5
- Product Photography75.2
