Crucial BX500 1TB SATA III 2.5"
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile) 87th
- Strong endurance (71st percentile) 71st
Nachteile
- Below average speed (25th percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
- Q2 2026100/100
Buyers in Q2 2026 praised the Crucial BX500 SSD for its speed, affordability, and reliability, often using it to upgrade older computers or replace failing drives. Many noted significant performance improvements and ample storage.
- SSD speed transforms older computers, making them feel new or faster than with previous HDDs or Windows 10.
- Affordable price and good value, especially for 1TB and 4TB capacities, though some note current market prices have risen.
- Easy installation and compatibility with laptops and desktops, including mounting and cloning old drives.
- Trust in Crucial/Micron brand for reliability and long-term durability, based on past experience.
- Q4 201953/100
Buyers in this period found the drive good value but running hot, with one dead on arrival and poor manufacturer support noted.
- One drive dead on arrival; another cites abhorrently poor manufacturer support.
- Drive runs hot, but considered good value with past Crucial warranty experiences positive.
- Drive performance praised as good, with recommendation for upgrading from older hard drives.
Basierend auf 23 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Drive
| Capacity | 1000 |
| Form Factor | 2.5" |
| Interface | SATA III |
| Protocol | SATA |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 540 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 500 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 100000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 80000 |
Hardware
| NAND | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | No |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 360 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1500000 |
| Warranty (years) | 3 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
| Hardware Encryption | No |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Crucial BX500 | Samsung 9100 PRO | Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G | Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 | SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE | Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1TB | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 8TB | 8TB |
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 540 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 7,200 MB/s |
| Nand Type | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | - |
| Dram Cache | false | true | true | false | true | true |
| Endurance | 360 TBW | 2400 TBW | 4000 TBW | 2400 TBW | 4800 TBW | 4800 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crucial BX500 | 25.4 | 42.8 | 53.7 | 55.4 | 70.6 | 87.1 | 54 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 99.2 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 92.5 | 86 | 99.6 | 5.2 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G Compare | 93.2 | 94.4 | 93.9 | 92.5 | 94.1 | 95.3 | 9.1 |
| Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare | 99 | 99.2 | 89.4 | 92.5 | 86 | 77.4 | 11 |
| SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE Compare | 89 | 96.3 | 93.9 | 98.1 | 88.1 | 95.3 | 3.7 |
| Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850P Compare | 87.7 | 96.3 | 84.9 | 98.1 | 71.3 | 95.3 | 3.9 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt56.4
- Budget83.8
- Gaming43.8
- Laptop53.7
- Console21.7
- Portable13.7
- Workstation49.7
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
