Nikon NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR

★★★★★ 4.8 (3,902)

A constant f/5.6 aperture across the 200-500mm zoom range and three ED glass elements deliver consistent sharpness and color accuracy, while the 4.5-stop Vibration Reduction system enables sharper handheld shooting. The Silent Wave Motor provides fast, quiet autofocus with full-time manual override, and the included tripod collar offers balanced support for extended use. This lens is best for wildlife and sports photographers using Nikon DSLRs who need a versatile super-telephoto reach without the premium price of exotic primes.

Focal length 200-500mm
Aperture f/32
Mount Nikon F
stabilization Ja
Weight 2300 g
af type Silent Wave Motor
lens type zoom
Nikon NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR lens
59 Gesamtbewertung
Preis 0 R$
Keine Angebote verfügbar
Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

Vor- und Nachteile

Vorteile

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile) 95th
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile) 93rd
  • Strong optical (89th percentile) 89th
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile) 80th

Nachteile

  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)
  • Below average build (8th percentile)

Was Besitzer sagen

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist über die Zeit stabil geblieben
88/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysemittlere Konfidenz · 16 Quellen · Mai 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '19: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '20: 5.0★ · 13 BewertungenQ2 '20: 3.9★ · 17 BewertungenQ3 '20: 4.8★ · 17 BewertungenQ4 '20: 4.8★ · 12 BewertungenQ1 '21: 5.0★ · 10 BewertungenQ2 '21: 5.0★ · 24 BewertungenQ3 '21: 5.0★ · 23 BewertungenQ4 '21: 4.9★ · 15 BewertungenQ1 '22: 4.9★ · 14 BewertungenQ2 '22: 4.9★ · 27 BewertungenQ3 '22: 4.9★ · 23 BewertungenQ4 '22: 4.8★ · 14 BewertungenQ1 '23: 3.0★ · 6 BewertungenQ2 '23: 4.9★ · 15 BewertungenQ3 '23: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ4 '23: 4.9★ · 11 BewertungenQ1 '24: 4.3★ · 7 BewertungenQ2 '24: 4.2★ · 11 BewertungenQ3 '24: 4.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '24: 4.7★ · 6 BewertungenQ1 '25: 4.8★ · 6 BewertungenQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 12 BewertungenQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ4 '25: 4.8★ · 6 BewertungenQ1 '26: 2.8★ · 5 BewertungenQ2 '26: 4.9★ · 8 BewertungenQ3 '26: 5.0★ · 7 Bewertungen1121317171210242315142723146154117111661246587Q3 '18Q1 '20Q4 '20Q3 '21Q2 '22Q1 '23Q4 '23Q3 '24Q2 '25Q1 '26Q3 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen
  1. Q2 202584/1004.0★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, VR performance, and value, while noting its weight and desire for better packaging or an Arca-Swiss foot.

    • Image quality and sharpness consistently praised, even by first-time users.
    • Lens is heavy; some find hand-holding difficult, but manageable with a tripod.
    • VR system effective for handheld shots, yielding better-than-expected results.
    • Packaging insufficient; outer box crushed in one case, though lens not damaged.
  2. Q2 202380/1004.7★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, value, and handheld usability, though some noted slow autofocus and minor zoom stroke length.

    • Sharp image quality and versatile zoom praised for nature and sports photography.
    • Autofocus slow for some users, especially with adapter on Z cameras.
    • Lightweight and quiet for handheld use, even with larger bodies like Z9.
    • Zoom takes multiple strokes from 200 to 500mm, but not a major drawback.
  3. Q4 2022100/1005.0★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens for its sharpness, fast AF, and effective VR, ideal for wildlife and sports. A few note its heaviness and slow zoom adjustment.

    • Excellent sharpness and contrast across focal lengths and low light.
    • VR works well for handheld shots, especially with compatible DSLRs.
    • Lens is heavy, requiring monopod or gimbal; zoom takes two full turns.
    • Great value for a fixed-aperture telephoto; good for birding and sports.
  4. Q3 2022100/1004.9★9 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens as excellent value, with superb sharpness and reach, especially for wildlife photography. The main drawbacks noted are its weight and slightly slow autofocus.

    • Excellent value for the price, delivering high optical performance at 200-500mm.
    • Great for wildlife photography, providing clarity and detail at distance.
    • Heavy build, but many consider it manageable or worth the trade-off for quality.
    • Autofocus is slower than ideal, requiring planning for fast action shots.
  5. Q2 202286/1004.9★18 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, versatility, and value, though consistent complaints about heavy weight and shoulder strain were noted.

    • Sharp, crisp image quality for wildlife, sports, and events.
    • Heavy; some find it manageable for short periods, others report shoulder pain.
    • Compatible with both DSLR and mirrorless cameras with adapters.
    • First unit had focus issues, requiring replacement.
  6. Q1 202295/1004.9★11 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the Nikon 200-500mm for exceptional sharpness, build quality, and VR. Some note it is heavy.

    • Sharpness excellent across zoom range and apertures, especially compared to third-party lenses.
    • Build quality and vibration reduction (VR) considered top-notch, typical of Nikon.
    • Lens is heavy; some users find it cumbersome to carry without tripod.
    • Works well with various Nikon cameras including D850, D3400, and Z50 via adapter.
  7. Q4 202185/1004.8★9 Bewertungen

    Buyers are very impressed with sharpness, fast autofocus, and value for wildlife/rocket photography. A few note the lens is heavy and the included filter kit is incompatible.

    • Exceptional sharpness and autofocus performance for bird/nature and rocket photography.
    • Great value and bargain, especially when purchased on sale.
    • Lens is heavy; some find it manageable, others suggest monopod/tripod required.
    • Included filter kit has non-matching threads, considered useless by one reviewer.
  8. Q3 202192/1005.0★12 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, VR performance, and value, though some noted it's heavy.

    • Sharp images and excellent optical quality highlighted by multiple reviewers.
    • VR effective, enabling sharp handheld shots at slow shutter speeds.
    • Lens is heavy but manageable with tripod or handheld.
    • Great value for a handholdable 500mm telephoto lens.
  9. Q2 2021100/1005.0★13 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised sharpness, VR, and handling for wildlife photography. All reviews were positive, with many recommending the lens.

    • Sharp optics and excellent image quality across zoom ranges.
    • VR enables effective handheld shooting, reducing tripod need.
    • Well-suited for bird/wildlife photography.
    • Good value for a long telephoto lens.

Basierend auf 322 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

AF 53.7
Bokeh 7.5
Build 7.9
Macro 35.6
Optical 88.8
Aperture 5
User Sentiment 80.4
Versatility 76.9
Nutzerresonanz 92.6
Stabilization 95.3

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 200
Focal Length Max 500
Elements 19
Groups 12
Aspherical Elements 0
ED Elements 3
Coating Super Integrated Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/32
Min Aperture f/5.6
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Nikon F
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed No
Weight 2.3 kg / 5.1 lbs
Filter Thread 95

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Silent Wave Motor
Stabilization Yes
Stabilization Stops 4.5

Focus

Min Focus Distance 2200
Max Magnification 1:4.55

Im Vergleich

Spec Nikon NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12060 Sony G SELP28135G.SYX Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Focal Length 200-500mm 17-70mm 16-28mm 12-60mm 28-135mm 28-70mm
Max Aperture f/32 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/4 f/22
Mount Nikon F Fujifilm X Sony E Micro Four Thirds Sony E Canon RF
Stabilization true true false true true true
Weather Sealed false true true true true true
Weight (g) 2300 544 450 320 420 495
AF Type Silent Wave Motor RXD Stepping AF Motor linear motor SSM STM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilityNutzerresonanzStabilization
Nikon NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR 53.77.57.935.688.8580.476.992.695.3
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare 53.787.469.685.99184.663.389.385.183.4
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN Compare 87.487.475.977.897.284.675.56862.737.8
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12060 Compare 98.187.484.651.99184.644.293.167.883.4
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX Compare 94.478.477.734.18867.163.392.455.793.4
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare 87.424.172.68086.22198.176.989.398.6

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Macro (50.9)Gesamt (58.7)Budget (59.7)Street (41.3)Travel (48)Portrait (33.6)Landscape (57.6)Professional (47.6)Video Cinema (51.1)Wildlife Sports (51.2)

Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.

Ähnliche Produkte