Rokinon AF IO12AF-E 12mm

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben — so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

1. Q1 202275/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

   Reviews praise the lens's wide angle and fast aperture for low light, but multiple users report IBIS incompatibility causing blurry images, needing a firmware fix.

   • 👍Wide angle and fast aperture are excellent for low light and landscapes.
   • 🤔IBIS works on some cameras but fails on X-T4 and X-S10, causing blur.
   • 👎Multiple reports of IBIS incompatibility requiring firmware update.
   • 👍Lens build quality feels solid with reversible hood and pouch.
2. Q4 202167/1005.0★3 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised sharpness for astrophotography and overall quality, though one humorous review noted marital jealousy.

   • 👍Excellent sharpness for night sky photography with minimal chromatic aberration.
   • 👍Great value for the price and good build quality.
   • 👍Sharp corner to corner performance.
   • 🤔One buyer witty about lens causing marital tension despite its quality.
3. Q2 202190/1004.7★4 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised value, solid build, and manual control for astrophotography. Minor gripes: inaccurate dial stops, cap-leash interference, and mediocre bundled filters.

   • 👍Great value, solid build, and good for astrophotography.
   • 🤔Manual focus gives control but dial stops are not fully accurate.
   • 👎Cap-leash interferes with focus ring; bundled filters are mediocre.
4. Q1 2021100/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise this wide angle lens for its value, speed, and versatility in landscape and astrophotography. It's recommended for beginners and experienced users alike.

   • 👍Excellent wide angle lens for the price.
   • 👍Fast f2.0 aperture praised for low light.
   • 👍Versatile for landscape and astrophotography.
   • 👍Good for beginners to practice manual focus.
5. Q3 202073/1004.6★7 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens as great value for its price, ideal for landscape and astrophotography, but noted it lacks autofocus and can produce soft results if not careful.

   • 👍Excellent value for money, especially for beginners in astrophotography.
   • 👍Sharp with good colors; manual focus helps improve skills.
   • 👎Lack of autofocus may lead to out-of-focus shots.
   • 👎Lens flare not well controlled; avoid shooting into light sources.
6. Q4 201973/1004.3★3 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise sharpness and value but note corner coma at f/2, making it less ideal for astrophotography without cropping.

   • 👍Sharp image quality and excellent value for the price.
   • 🤔Center sharp at f/2, but corners have coma, limiting astrophotography use.
   • 👍Lightweight design works well on gimbals for video.
   • 👎Coma issues at wide aperture require stopping down for corner clarity.
7. Q3 201984/1004.4★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the wide, fast aperture and value for astrophotography, but noted manual focus challenges and some vignetting.

   • 👍Wide angle, fast aperture, good for astrophotography and landscapes.
   • 🤔Manual focus and no autofocus: requires practice but manageable with focus peaking.
   • 🤔Image quality: sharp overall, but some vignetting and distortion noted.
   • 👍Great value for the price compared to more expensive lenses.
8. Q2 201983/1004.7★11 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and value, especially for Sony APS-C cameras. It works well for low-light and astrophotography, though some note it lacks weathersealing and full-frame compatibility.

   • 👍Excellent sharpness, especially in daylight; good performance at f/2 and very sharp at f/4.
   • 👍Great value for the price; solid build quality and lightweight design.
   • 👍Performs well in low-light and astrophotography; ideal for concerts and tight spaces.
   • 🤔No weathersealing; manual focus requires practice for night shots; lens bag quality is poor.
9. Q1 201982/1004.8★12 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for outstanding sharpness, value, and compactness, though some noted quality variation and lack of EXIF data.

   • 👍Exceptional sharpness and image quality for the price, exceeding expectations.
   • 👍Great value, compact size, and solid build for APS-C mirrorless cameras.
   • 👎Quality control issues: 1 of 4 owners reported needing to return copies for misalignment.
   • 🤔No EXIF data recorded; displayed incorrect focal length (21mm) when lens is 12mm.
10. Q4 201882/1004.6★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the sharpness, low-light performance, and value of this manual lens. However, some cite the tight focus ring and loose mount as drawbacks.

    • 👍Sharp image quality and good low-light performance for the price.
    • 👍Excellent value for money; compact, lightweight build.
    • 👎Tight focus ring makes manual focusing difficult.
    • 👎Loose lens mount causes shifting on camera body.
11. Q3 2018100/1005.0★7 Bewertungen

    All five-star reviews praise the lens's sharpness, low price, and suitability for various photography uses.

    • 👍Lens is sharp, even wide open, with good corner-to-corner performance.
    • 👍Excellent value for the price; offers high quality at a low cost.
    • 👍Works well for specific applications like architecture, real estate, and night sky photography.
    • 🤔Peripheral line curvature noted but considered acceptable for the lens's purpose.
12. Q2 201890/1004.8★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised this lens as lightweight, fast, and versatile for landscapes, interiors, and even band photography, though some noted manual focus challenges.

    • 👍Lightweight and fast aperture, ideal for mirrorless systems.
    • 👍Versatile for interior real estate, astrophotography, and band shots.
    • 🤔Some users find manual focus harder than autofocus alternatives.
    • 👍Cost-effective compared to pricier Fujifilm alternatives.
13. Q1 201883/1004.3★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, value, and performance in astro/landscape/street photography. Common nitpicks: stiff focus ring, slight mount wobble, loose lens cap, and need for a different hood for polarizers.

    • 👍Sharp wide-angle image quality with minimal distortion, great for cathedral, interior, astro, and street shots.
    • 🤔Lens is very affordable and compact, but some wish for autofocus at this price point.
    • 👎Stiff manual focus ring and slight mount wobble noted, considered expected at this budget.
    • 👎Loose-fitting lens cap is a nuisance, though it does not affect image quality.
14. Q4 201765/1003.8★4 Bewertungen

    Mixed reviews: two 5-star users praise lens quality and wide-angle performance, while a 1-star user reports a bad copy with inconsistent sharpness.

    • 👍Great clarity and sharpness for landscapes and astrophotography.
    • 👍Works well with focus peaking on Fuji X-Pro2 and other cameras.
    • 🤔Build quality and price considered good, but manual focus requires setup.
    • 👎One user received a bad copy with inconsistent focus across the field.
15. Q3 201790/1004.9★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised this as an excellent value 12mm f/2 manual lens for Fuji. Highly sharp, great for astro/landscapes, but some noted minor vignetting, slight play, and a touch of fisheye effect.

    • 👍Exceptional sharpness and image quality, especially for night and astrophotography.
    • 👍Excellent value for money; best budget ultra-wide option for Fuji system.
    • 👍Lightweight, compact, and stays on camera; great build and manual focus feel.
    • 🤔Minor optical quirks: slight vignetting in low light, mild fisheye effect, some lens play.
16. Q2 201783/1004.7★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens' value, sharpness, and performance for landscapes and astrophotography. A few noted manual focus challenges in low light with moving subjects.

    • 👍Excellent value and sharpness for the price; good for landscapes and astro.
    • 👍Works well with Sony A6000/A6500 and Fuji XT2; good outdoor results.
    • 👎Manual focus is challenging in low light; fail with moving subjects.
    • 👎Requires careful live view focusing; not suitable for snap-and-go users.

Basierend auf 112 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.