ASRock Arc Pro B60 24GB GDDR6 workstation Black
The 24GB GDDR6 frame buffer on a 192-bit bus is the defining feature, providing ample memory for large AI models and datasets that would choke 8GB or 16GB cards. Its PCI Express 5.0 x8 interface and blower-style cooler make it a practical, single-slot solution for dense multi-GPU server and workstation deployments. This card is best for AI developers and researchers running local large language model inference who need high memory capacity on a budget.
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong ai (91st percentile) 91st
- Strong vram (91st percentile) 91st
- Strong connectivity (87th percentile) 87th
Nachteile
- Below average social proof (9th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (24th percentile)
- Below average raster (33rd percentile)
- Below average thermal (33rd percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
- Q4 202678/100
Buyers in Q4 2026 praised the B60 Pro's value, VRAM, and SR-IOV support, but noted driver/software setup challenges, high idle power, and loud blower fan under gaming.
- Excellent value for VRAM and SR-IOV, especially for Linux and AI workloads; solid build quality.
- Intel's software stack (oneAPI/SYCL) requires command-line patience but is stable once configured.
- Loud blower fan during gaming; performance about 10% below B580.
- High idle power consumption and drivers still need work for local inference.
- Q3 202673/100
Buyers in Q3 2026 praised the GPU's VRAM capacity, build quality, and QuickSync performance for LLM inference, but one reported driver issues and noted slower core speed.
- Large VRAM enables LLM inference and is a key selling point.
- Good build quality and works out of the box with Ubuntu 26.04.
- Performance is midrange; not faster than other options but energy-efficient.
- Driver issues reported by one buyer, though VRAM was a plus.
Basierend auf 9 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Arc Pro B60 |
| Brand | Intel |
| Architecture | Xe-LPG |
| Class | workstation |
| Process | 3 |
Memory
| VRAM | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 192 |
| ECC | No |
Compute
| Tensor Cores | 160 |
| RT Cores | 20 |
| Base Clock | 2400 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 3.891 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 1.946 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 15049 |
| GPU Compute | 7058 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 225 |
| Recommended PSU | 550 |
| Power Connectors | 8 Pin |
| Cooler | Blower |
| Fans | 1 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 4 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 |
Physical
| Length | 271 |
| Slot Width | 2 |
| Form Factor | Full Height |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| AV1 Encode | Yes |
| VR Ready | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | No |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | ASRock Arc Pro B60 | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 24GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2400 | 2407 | 2482 | 2805 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 225 | 575 | 300 | 360 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 192 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | workstation | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Arc Pro B60 | 91 | 36.2 | 91 | 32.7 | 58.9 | 63.5 | 33.4 | 23.5 | 87 | 8.5 | 41.5 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.5 | 96.2 | 72.7 | 25 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.5 | 88.7 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 73.1 | 94 | 88.8 | 21.1 |
| Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD Compare | 85.1 | 95.2 | 88.6 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 58 | 94 | 88.8 | 15.9 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.1 | 97.5 | 88.6 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 58 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.2 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.8 | 96.1 | 91.6 | 83.9 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.9 | 98.7 | 78.3 | 18.6 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Amazon 1 Angebot Ab 5.504 R$
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt53.7
- AI/LLM67.2
- Budget36.4
- Gaming 4k34.2
- Ray Tracing35.5
- Workstation62.2
- Gaming 1080p30.3
- Gaming 1440p32.3
- Content Creation55
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
