Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5
Der 32-Kern-Xeon mit 64 Threads und 3,5 GHz Boost erreicht im PassMark 110.697 Punkte im Multi-Thread-Test und unterstützt bis zu 2.048 GB DDR4-ECC-RAM. Mit 200 W TDP und PCIe 3.0 ist er auf Server-Workloads ausgelegt, während die Effizienz mit 43,6/100 das schwächste Feld bleibt. Am besten geeignet für Produktivitätsaufgaben (93,7/100) und Server-Betrieb (86,2/100), etwa für Datenbanken oder Virtualisierung in Rechenzentren.
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
The 30-Second Version
The specs are a fever dream. You're buying a 2013 4-core Xeon, not a 32-core monster.
Pros & Cons
Vorteile
- Dirt cheap at $51 if you just need a basic server chip 99th
- ECC memory support is nice for a budget NAS 99th
- Low power draw for an old Xeon, relatively speaking 97th
- Socket A/462 compatibility is weirdly broad for tinkerers 91st
Nachteile
- Spec sheet is completely wrong, 4 cores not 32
- DDR4 support listed but this chip uses DDR3
- PCIe 3.0 only, no modern features
- Zero customer reviews, you're buying blind
Die Fakten
Performance
If the specs were real, a 110,697 PassMark multi-thread score would put this in the absolute best right now territory, crushing almost everything we've tested. But the single-thread score of 3,783 is a dead giveaway that something's off. A 32-core Turin chip would not score that low on single thread. The real E5-2637 v2 is a 4-core, 8-thread part with a 3.5GHz boost. It's fine for a basic home server or a retro build, but it's not touching those benchmark numbers. The performance section here is basically a cautionary tale about trusting retailer spec dumps.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Xeon |
| Model | 9455 |
| Codename | Turin |
| Class | server |
| Process | 4 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 32 |
| P-cores | 48 |
| Threads | 64 |
| Base Clock | 2000 |
| Boost Clock | 3500 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 48 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 110697 |
| PassMark Single | 3783 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 6000 |
| Max Memory | 2048 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 |
| TDP | 200 |
| Max Turbo Power | 350 |
| Unlocked | No |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | No |
vs Competition
Against a Ryzen 5 7600, this thing is a fossil. The 7600 has modern single-thread performance that would embarrass the old Xeon in everything from gaming to basic desktop work. The Core Ultra 5 225F is even further ahead on efficiency. If you need a cheap server chip, an old Xeon like this can work, but you'd be better off with a used Ryzen 5 3600 or even an i5-4590S, which at least has accurate listings and better single-thread grunt. The be quiet! and KOMQI listings are just as sketchy, so avoid those too.
| Spec | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | SMC EPYC 9555P | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | HP Xeon P67080-B21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 32 | 8 | 24 | 64 | 24 | 16 |
| Threads | 64 | 16 | 24 | 128 | 48 | 32 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3500 | 5200 | 5700 | 4400 | 4000 | 3900 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 256 | 96 | 36 | 256 | 128 | 37.5 |
| Tdp W | 200 | 120 | 125 | 360 | 200 | 195 |
| Socket | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | AM5 | LGA 1851 | AMD Socket SP5 | AMD Socket SP3 | LGA 4677 |
| Integrated Graphics | No | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel Graphics | - | - | No |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | 99.1 | 90.7 | 76.3 | 97.4 | 99.2 | 89.3 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare | 91.3 | 98.5 | 95.1 | 87.7 | 90 | 95.7 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.8 | 95.9 | 97.1 | 96.6 | 99.8 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 76.9 | 96.8 | 90.8 | 99.5 | 88.7 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.8 | 76.9 | 84.1 | 83.8 | 94.5 | 80.2 |
| HP Xeon P67080-B21 Compare | 91.7 | 76.9 | 90.7 | 78.2 | 90.9 | 80.4 |
Preis
Value & Pricing
At $51, it's cheap enough to gamble on if you know exactly what you're getting. But you don't, because the listing lies to you. A real E5-2637 v2 is worth maybe $15-20 on the used market. Paying $51 for a mystery chip with fake specs is not a value, it's a lottery ticket with bad odds.
Mehr erfahren
Overview
This listing is a mess of contradictions. The title says Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2, which is a 4-core Ivy Bridge chip from 2013, but the specs describe a 32-core Xeon Turin monster with 256MB of L3 cache. You're not getting both for $51. What you're actually getting is almost certainly the old 4-core E5-2637 v2, a server pull that belongs in a museum, not a modern build. The spec sheet is pure fantasy, and that's the one thing to know before you click buy.
Common Questions
Q: Is this really a 32-core Xeon Turin chip?
No. The E5-2637 v2 is a 4-core Ivy Bridge chip from 2013. The 32-core specs are wrong. You're getting a decade-old server pull.
Q: Will this work in a normal desktop motherboard?
Probably not. It uses Socket A/462, which is ancient. You'd need a specific old server board. Most modern boards won't even physically accept it.
Q: Is $51 a good price for this?
Not really. These chips go for less on eBay from sellers who actually list the right specs. You're paying a premium for a listing that can't even get the core count right.
Who Should Skip This
If you're looking for a modern CPU for gaming, productivity, or AI work, this isn't it. Go get a Ryzen 5 7600 or even a used Ryzen 5 3600 instead. If you need a cheap server chip, buy from a seller who knows what they're selling. This listing is for people who enjoy gambling with their money and their time.
Verdict
Don't buy this. The listing is either a scam or a spectacularly lazy data entry error. Either way, you're not getting a 32-core Turin chip for $51. If you need a cheap server CPU, buy from a reputable used parts seller with actual photos and accurate specs. This Best Buy listing is a trap.
