Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm

Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm

Viltrox
56 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Viltrox
62
Portrait
Nikon
89
Viltrox
53
Street
Nikon
86
Viltrox
61
Budget
Nikon
86
Viltrox
51
Macro
Nikon
85
Viltrox
62
Landscape
Nikon
83
Viltrox
61
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Viltrox
51
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Viltrox
62
Travel
Nikon
75
Viltrox
50

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1313
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements32
CoatingMulti-CoatedHD nano multicoating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.34 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm340 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:10

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (76th percentile)
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports