Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
Ricoh
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
94 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Budget
Street
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 40 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 40 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 0 | 3★ |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | GR | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.26 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | AF híbrido | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 120 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
Preise
Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
No current pricing available
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
