Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon
78 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
94 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Canon
60
Nikon
94
Portrait
Canon
40
Nikon
88
Budget
Canon
80
Nikon
87
Street
Canon
63
Nikon
87
Macro
Canon
83
Nikon
84
Landscape
Canon
77
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
67
Nikon
83
Travel
Canon
81
Nikon
71
Wildlife Sports
Canon
77
Nikon
78

Spezifikationen

Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max150 mm28 mm
Elements1713
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements13
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/40f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.31 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread55 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:2.71:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile

Preise

Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 94 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM Besser bei:

Travel

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

BudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Auch in Betracht ziehen