Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E

Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E

Hasselblad
37 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Sony
94
Hasselblad
34
Street
Sony
91
Hasselblad
38
Budget
Sony
90
Hasselblad
40
Wildlife Sports
Sony
89
Hasselblad
43
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Hasselblad
34
Landscape
Sony
83
Hasselblad
46
Portrait
Sony
82
Hasselblad
27
Professional
Sony
82
Hasselblad
39
Macro
Sony
66
Hasselblad
49

Spezifikationen

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSHasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm100 mm
Elements916
Groups813
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements15★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/32
Min Aperture3.5-5.62.8-4
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony EHasselblad XCD
FormatAPS-C★medium-format
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.89 kg
Filter Thread41 mm86 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusstepping motor★
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:4.0★

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile

Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong versatility (79th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average build (21st percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports