HP E24T G5 24" Black 2024

The HP E24t G5 scores 53.4 out of 100, with a standout 91st percentile ergonomic score and a disappointing 21st percentile display score. The 23.8-inch FHD touch panel runs at 75Hz with 300 nits brightness and 99% sRGB. It's a niche pick for touch-first productivity users who value adjustability over picture quality.

The performance score sits at the 39th percentile, which is underwhelming. The 75Hz refresh rate is a small step up from the standard 60Hz you'd find on most office monitors, but it's not going to impress anyone who's used a 144Hz panel. The 5ms GtG response time with overdrive is fine for spreadsheets and web browsing, but you'll see some ghosting in fast-moving content. The 1000:1 static contrast ratio is standard IPS fare, nothing special.

The touchscreen is the real differentiator here. HP uses in-cell touch technology, which keeps the panel thin and responsive. In our testing, touch monitors in this price range often sacrifice display quality for the touch layer, and that's exactly what's happening here. The 300 nits brightness is adequate for indoor office use but will struggle near bright windows. The 99% sRGB coverage is solid for color accuracy in office documents and basic photo viewing, though the 6-bit + FRC panel means you're not getting true 8-bit color depth.

Stacked against the competition in our database, the E24t G5 is in a weird spot. The ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG, MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2, LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B, Samsung Odyssey G60SD, and Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA all blow it away on display quality and performance. Those are gaming and high-refresh monitors with OLED panels and 240Hz+ refresh rates. But none of them have touchscreens, and most don't offer the same level of ergonomic adjustability. The HP is for a completely different buyer, someone who needs touch input and all-day comfort over raw specs. If you don't need touch, any of those competitors will give you a dramatically better picture for similar or slightly more money.

Pricing is all over the map depending on where you shop. In the US, you're looking at $270. In Europe, the spread is EUR 311 to EUR 384 across four listings, a EUR 73 gap that's worth paying attention to. The best deal we're seeing is at the lower end of that range, so shop around before you buy. In Canada, it's CAD 432 to CAD 451, and in the UK it's GBP 299. For a touch monitor with this level of ergonomic adjustability, the US price feels reasonable. The higher European prices push it into territory where you could start looking at better panels without touch, or touch monitors with better displays.

The HP E24t G5 is a 23.8-inch FHD touch monitor that scores 53.4 out of 100 in our database. That's a middle-of-the-pack result, and it tells the story pretty well. This is a monitor that does one thing really well, ergonomics, and a bunch of other things just okay. The 91st percentile ergonomic score is the headline here. Height adjust, pivot, tilt, swivel, the works. If you spend all day at a desk, that's the kind of thing you feel in your neck and shoulders by 4pm.

But the display itself is where things get rough. A 21st percentile display score means the panel quality lags behind most of what we've tested. You get 300 nits brightness, 99% sRGB, and a 75Hz refresh rate. For a touch monitor aimed at office and light professional use, that's serviceable. For anything else, it's a compromise. The 5ms response time and 75Hz cap put it firmly in productivity territory, not gaming or creative work.

Skip this if you care about picture quality. The 21st percentile display score is one of the weakest we've seen in this category, and the 6-bit + FRC panel means colors won't be as smooth as a true 8-bit display. Gamers should also look elsewhere, the 75Hz cap and 5ms response time are a real letdown for anything fast-paced. And if you don't need touch, you're paying a premium for a feature you won't use. A non-touch IPS monitor at the same price will give you a noticeably better panel.

The HP E24t G5 earns its 53.4 total score honestly. It's a niche product that nails its niche, ergonomic touch productivity, but falls short everywhere else. The 91st percentile ergonomic score is genuinely impressive, and the in-cell touchscreen is responsive and well-implemented. But the 21st percentile display score is hard to ignore. You're paying for touch and adjustability, not picture quality. If those are your priorities, this is a solid buy. If you want a great-looking display first and touch second, look elsewhere.