AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 64-core sTR5
معالج 64 نواة و128 خيطًا بتردد boost يصل إلى 5.4 جيجاهرتز مبني على تقنية TSMC 4nm Shimada Peak يوفر أداءً متعدد الخيوط يبلغ 142812 نقطة في PassMark وذاكرة تخزين مؤقت L3 بسعة 256 ميجابايت للأحمال الحسابية الثقيلة. مع قدرة حرارية 350 واط ودعم ذاكرة DDR5 حتى 1000 جيجابايت وPCIe 5.0، صُمم لتحقيق أقصى إنتاجية، على الرغم من أن كفاءته ضعيفة (41.8/100). مثالي لتطبيقات الخوادم والإنتاجية (93.2/100 و92.4/100 على التوالي)، مثل المطورين الذين يعالجون مجموعات بيانات ضخمة أو يدربون نماذج الذكاء الاصطناعي.
لمحة سريعة
The 30-Second Version
The Threadripper 9980X is a 64-core beast that tops our multi-thread charts, but it's thirsty, hot, and needs a separate GPU. Buy it for serious workstation work, not for Roblox.
Pros & Cons
الإيجابيات
- 64 cores and 128 threads, the absolute best multi-thread performance we've seen 100th
- 256MB L3 cache is massive for AI and rendering workloads 100th
- DDR5 with ECC support up to 1000GB, great for serious workstations 99th
- PCIe 5.0 and unlocked for overclocking, no artificial limits 98th
السلبيات
- 350W TDP, 500W turbo, this thing drinks power like it's free
- No integrated graphics, you must buy a separate GPU
- No cooler in the box, budget for a serious cooling solution
- User sentiment is rough, 5th percentile, and there are fake chip reports floating around
آراء المالكين
The Word on the Street
كيف تغيّر رأي المالكين بمرور الوقت
حصرياستنادًا إلى وقت كتابة العملاء لتقييماتهم فعليًا - لترى ما إذا كان الثناء المبكر قد استمر.
الأدلة
Performance
The multi-thread numbers are absurd. 142,812 in PassMark is best-in-class, and the single-thread score of 4,532 is also near the top, which is rare for a chip with this many cores. The 5.4GHz boost on a 64-core part is genuinely impressive. But the efficiency score of 41.8/100 tells the real story: 350W TDP with a 500W turbo mode means your power bill is going to feel it. You'll need serious cooling and a beefy PSU just to keep this thing fed.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Model | 9980X |
| Codename | Shimada Peak |
| Class | hedt |
| Process | 4 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 64 |
| P-cores | 64 |
| Threads | 128 |
| Base Clock | 3200 |
| Boost Clock | 5400 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 64 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 142812 |
| PassMark Single | 4532 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 6400 |
| Channels | 4 |
| Max Memory | 1000 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | sTR5 |
| PCIe | 5 |
| PCIe Lanes | 92 |
| TDP | 350 |
| Max Turbo Power | 500 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | No |
vs Competition
The Threadripper 9980X sits in a weird spot. Against the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, it's not even close in multi-thread, the 9980X destroys it, but the Intel chip is a fraction of the price and way more efficient. The HP Xeon P67080-B21 is a server part, so it's a different beast entirely, but if you need ECC and tons of cores in a rack, that's the comparison to make. For most people, the 9980X is overkill, but for the few who need 64 cores in a desktop, nothing else comes close.
| Spec | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | SMC EPYC 9555P | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99940X | Dell Inspiron 7700 | HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 64 | 24 | 64 | 14 | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 128 | 24 | 128 | 28 | 12 | 2 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 5400 | 5700 | 4400 | 4400 | 4700 | 2800 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 256 | 36 | 256 | 19.25 | 12 | 4 |
| Tdp W | 350 | 125 | 360 | 165 | 15 | 6 |
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA 1851 | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA2066 | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel BGA 1338 |
| Integrated Graphics | No | Intel Graphics | - | - | Iris Xe 96EU | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| المنتج | AI | Feature | Platform | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Multi Thread | التقييم الاجتماعي | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | 99.7 | 98.5 | 98.2 | 5.2 | 92.3 | 99.8 | 5.8 | 96.3 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.8 | 95.9 | 78.7 | 97.1 | 96.7 | 90.4 | 99.8 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77 | 96.8 | 0 | 90.8 | 99.5 | 0 | 88.8 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99940X Compare | 87.4 | 62.5 | 77.1 | 0 | 72.2 | 84.7 | 73.7 | 73.9 |
| Dell Inspiron 7700 Compare | 62.6 | 69.6 | 71.1 | 0 | 99.4 | 66.6 | 25.1 | 82.1 |
| HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx Compare | 17.9 | 54.7 | 54.8 | 0 | 32.6 | 11.5 | 6.3 | 30.8 |
السعر
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place. In the US you're looking at USD 4,000 to USD 5,183 depending on the vendor, with Amazon and Newegg both listing it. That's a USD 1,183 spread, so shop around. In Europe it's EUR 5,130 to EUR 5,738, with the best EUR deal also at Amazon. For a 64-core workstation chip, the price is actually reasonable compared to what you'd pay for comparable server silicon, but the lack of a cooler and GPU means the real cost is higher than the sticker.
Amazon عرض واحد ابتداءً من 43,999 R$
نتتبع أسعار هذا المنتج منذ 9 يونيو 2026. سيظهر الرسم البياني عند توفر المزيد من البيانات.
اقرأ المزيد
Overview
The Threadripper 9980X is AMD's 64-core monster for people who actually need 128 threads. This is not a gaming chip, it's a workstation sledgehammer. The multi-thread score of 142,812 in PassMark puts it at the absolute top of our database, and the 256MB of L3 cache means heavy renders and AI workloads just chew through data. If you're compiling code, rendering 8K video, or running local LLMs, this thing is the current king of the hill.
Common Questions
Q: Do I need a separate graphics card with the 9980X?
Yes. There's no integrated GPU on this chip, so you'll need a dedicated graphics card just to get a display output. Budget for that.
Q: What kind of cooler do I need?
A serious one. The 9980X has a 350W TDP and can spike to 500W in turbo. You'll want a high-end air cooler or a 360mm AIO liquid cooler at minimum, and a case with excellent airflow.
Q: Is this good for gaming?
It'll game fine, but it's massive overkill. The single-thread performance is strong, but you're paying for 64 cores you won't use in games. Get a Ryzen 7 or 9 instead and spend the savings on a better GPU.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a gaming PC or a general-purpose desktop, skip this. You're paying for 64 cores you'll never use, and the power draw and cooling requirements are a headache. Get a Ryzen 7 9800X3D or a Core Ultra 9 285K instead and put the savings into a better GPU. This chip is for people who render, compile, or run AI workloads all day, not for Roblox sessions.
Verdict
If you need 64 cores and 128 threads in a desktop, buy this. It's the best multi-thread performer we've tested, and the platform is solid. But be ready to spend on a GPU, a serious cooler, and a power supply that can handle 500W spikes. And buy from a reputable vendor, because there are reports of fake chips with 9980X stickers on old 1950X silicon. That's a real problem.