AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 64-core sTR5

★★★★☆ 3.5 (15)

معالج 64 نواة و128 خيطًا بتردد boost يصل إلى 5.4 جيجاهرتز مبني على تقنية TSMC 4nm Shimada Peak يوفر أداءً متعدد الخيوط يبلغ 142812 نقطة في PassMark وذاكرة تخزين مؤقت L3 بسعة 256 ميجابايت للأحمال الحسابية الثقيلة. مع قدرة حرارية 350 واط ودعم ذاكرة DDR5 حتى 1000 جيجابايت وPCIe 5.0، صُمم لتحقيق أقصى إنتاجية، على الرغم من أن كفاءته ضعيفة (41.8/100). مثالي لتطبيقات الخوادم والإنتاجية (93.2/100 و92.4/100 على التوالي)، مثل المطورين الذين يعالجون مجموعات بيانات ضخمة أو يدربون نماذج الذكاء الاصطناعي.

Cores 64
Threads 128
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
L3 Cache 256 MB
TDP 350 W
Socket sTR5
Integrated Graphics No
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 64-core sTR5 cpu
77 التقييم العام
متوفر أيضًا في:

لمحة سريعة

The 30-Second Version

The Threadripper 9980X is a 64-core beast that tops our multi-thread charts, but it's thirsty, hot, and needs a separate GPU. Buy it for serious workstation work, not for Roblox.

Pros & Cons

الإيجابيات

  • 64 cores and 128 threads, the absolute best multi-thread performance we've seen 100th
  • 256MB L3 cache is massive for AI and rendering workloads 100th
  • DDR5 with ECC support up to 1000GB, great for serious workstations 99th
  • PCIe 5.0 and unlocked for overclocking, no artificial limits 98th

السلبيات

  • 350W TDP, 500W turbo, this thing drinks power like it's free
  • No integrated graphics, you must buy a separate GPU
  • No cooler in the box, budget for a serious cooling solution
  • User sentiment is rough, 5th percentile, and there are fake chip reports floating around

آراء المالكين

The Word on the Street

3.5/5 (15 reviews)
👍 Owners who pair it with a solid motherboard report fantastic performance and stability.
👎 A recurring complaint is the missing integrated graphics and cooler, which adds real cost.
👎 Some buyers report receiving fake chips with 9980X stickers on older 1950X silicon, which is a serious red flag.

كيف تغيّر رأي المالكين بمرور الوقت

حصري

استنادًا إلى وقت كتابة العملاء لتقييماتهم فعليًا - لترى ما إذا كان الثناء المبكر قد استمر.

55/100قراءتنا للمشاعر بالذكاء الاصطناعي▼20ثقة متوسطة · 12 مصادر · نوفمبر 2026
0255075100يوليو 2026: 75/100 · ثقة متوسطة · 12 مصادرأكتوبر 2026: 55/100 · ثقة متوسطة · 12 مصادرنوفمبر 2026: 55/100 · ثقة متوسطة · 12 مصادرنوفمبر 2026: 62/100 · ثقة متوسطة · 12 مصادرنوفمبر 2026: 55/100 · ثقة متوسطة · 12 مصادريوليو 2026أكتوبر 2026نوفمبر 2026نوفمبر 2026نوفمبر 2026
تحليلنا بالذكاء الاصطناعي

الأدلة

Performance

The multi-thread numbers are absurd. 142,812 in PassMark is best-in-class, and the single-thread score of 4,532 is also near the top, which is rare for a chip with this many cores. The 5.4GHz boost on a 64-core part is genuinely impressive. But the efficiency score of 41.8/100 tells the real story: 350W TDP with a 500W turbo mode means your power bill is going to feel it. You'll need serious cooling and a beefy PSU just to keep this thing fed.

Performance Percentiles

AI 99.7
Feature 98.5
Platform 98.2
User Sentiment 5.2
Efficiency 92.3
Multi Thread 99.8
التقييم الاجتماعي 5.8
Single Thread 96.3

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand AMD
Series Ryzen Threadripper
Model 9980X
Codename Shimada Peak
Class hedt
Process 4

Cores & Clocks

Cores 64
P-cores 64
Threads 128
Base Clock 3200
Boost Clock 5400

Cache

L2 Cache 64
L3 Cache 256 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 142812
PassMark Single 4532

Memory

Memory Type DDR5
Max Speed 6400
Channels 4
Max Memory 1000
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket sTR5
PCIe 5
PCIe Lanes 92
TDP 350
Max Turbo Power 500
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics No

vs Competition

The Threadripper 9980X sits in a weird spot. Against the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, it's not even close in multi-thread, the 9980X destroys it, but the Intel chip is a fraction of the price and way more efficient. The HP Xeon P67080-B21 is a server part, so it's a different beast entirely, but if you need ECC and tons of cores in a rack, that's the comparison to make. For most people, the 9980X is overkill, but for the few who need 64 cores in a desktop, nothing else comes close.

Spec AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X Intel Core Ultra 9 285K SMC EPYC 9555P D&H Core i9 BX80673I99940X Dell Inspiron 7700 HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx
Cores 64 24 64 14 10 2
Threads 128 24 128 28 12 2
Boost Clock Mhz 5400 5700 4400 4400 4700 2800
L3 Cache Mb 256 36 256 19.25 12 4
Tdp W 350 125 360 165 15 6
Socket sTR5 LGA 1851 AMD Socket SP5 LGA2066 Intel BGA 1744 Intel BGA 1338
Integrated Graphics No Intel Graphics - - Iris Xe 96EU Intel UHD Graphics
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
المنتج AIFeaturePlatformUser SentimentEfficiencyMulti Threadالتقييم الاجتماعيSingle Thread
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 99.798.598.25.292.399.85.896.3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare 96.299.895.978.797.196.790.499.8
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.37796.8090.899.5088.8
D&H Core i9 BX80673I99940X Compare 87.462.577.1072.284.773.773.9
Dell Inspiron 7700 Compare 62.669.671.1099.466.625.182.1
HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx Compare 17.954.754.8032.611.56.330.8

السعر

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place. In the US you're looking at USD 4,000 to USD 5,183 depending on the vendor, with Amazon and Newegg both listing it. That's a USD 1,183 spread, so shop around. In Europe it's EUR 5,130 to EUR 5,738, with the best EUR deal also at Amazon. For a 64-core workstation chip, the price is actually reasonable compared to what you'd pay for comparable server silicon, but the lack of a cooler and GPU means the real cost is higher than the sticker.

ابتداءً من ‏43,999 R$ عرض واحد من متجر واحد
Amazon عرض واحد ابتداءً من ‏43,999 R$

نتتبع أسعار هذا المنتج منذ 9 يونيو 2026. سيظهر الرسم البياني عند توفر المزيد من البيانات.

اقرأ المزيد

Overview

The Threadripper 9980X is AMD's 64-core monster for people who actually need 128 threads. This is not a gaming chip, it's a workstation sledgehammer. The multi-thread score of 142,812 in PassMark puts it at the absolute top of our database, and the 256MB of L3 cache means heavy renders and AI workloads just chew through data. If you're compiling code, rendering 8K video, or running local LLMs, this thing is the current king of the hill.

Common Questions

Q: Do I need a separate graphics card with the 9980X?

Yes. There's no integrated GPU on this chip, so you'll need a dedicated graphics card just to get a display output. Budget for that.

Q: What kind of cooler do I need?

A serious one. The 9980X has a 350W TDP and can spike to 500W in turbo. You'll want a high-end air cooler or a 360mm AIO liquid cooler at minimum, and a case with excellent airflow.

Q: Is this good for gaming?

It'll game fine, but it's massive overkill. The single-thread performance is strong, but you're paying for 64 cores you won't use in games. Get a Ryzen 7 or 9 instead and spend the savings on a better GPU.

Who Should Skip This

If you're building a gaming PC or a general-purpose desktop, skip this. You're paying for 64 cores you'll never use, and the power draw and cooling requirements are a headache. Get a Ryzen 7 9800X3D or a Core Ultra 9 285K instead and put the savings into a better GPU. This chip is for people who render, compile, or run AI workloads all day, not for Roblox sessions.

Verdict

If you need 64 cores and 128 threads in a desktop, buy this. It's the best multi-thread performer we've tested, and the platform is solid. But be ready to spend on a GPU, a serious cooler, and a power supply that can handle 500W spikes. And buy from a reputable vendor, because there are reports of fake chips with 9980X stickers on old 1950X silicon. That's a real problem.

Usage Scores

الإجمالي (77.4)AI/LLM (86.1)Budget (53.2)الألعاب (53.6)Server (93.1)Efficiency (41.7)Productivity (92.4)

منتجات مشابهة