Canon EOS R R1 Black 2024

استنادًا إلى وقت كتابة العملاء لتقييماتهم فعليًا - لترى ما إذا كان الثناء المبكر قد استمر.

1. Q3 202696/1005.0★3 مراجعات

   Buyers in this period praised the Canon R1 for its autofocus, high-speed shooting, pre-capture, and low-noise ISO performance, noting excellent battery life and ergonomics. One mentioned the need for fast CF Express cards.

   • 👍Autofocus and high-speed shooting (40fps, pre-capture) excel for fast action like sports and birds.
   • 👍ISO 3200 images are clean with modest noise reduction; electronic shutter shows no artifacts.
   • 👍Battery life is very good; ergonomics, build, and weight are praised as perfect.
   • 🤔Requires fast, high-capacity CF Express type B cards; users should invest accordingly.
2. Q1 202696/1005.0★5 مراجعات

   Buyers praise the camera's image quality, autofocus, and customization, calling it a major upgrade. One notes eye-tracking focus selection may be flawed, but it's not a dealbreaker.

   • 👍Image quality and autofocus are exceptional, with eye detection AF praised as a standout feature.
   • 👍Camera is dependable in weather and for fast-moving subjects, ideal for professional use.
   • 👍Highly customizable and ergonomic improvements over previous models, with 40 FPS addictive.
   • 🤔Eye tracking for focus point selection may have issues, but possibly user error and not critical.
3. Q4 202572/1004.6★5 مراجعات

   Buyers praise the R1's autofocus speed, viewfinder, and image quality, but a long-term user reports firmware glitches, eye-control AF issues, and back-focus problems, calling it only a modest upgrade over the 1DX III.

   • 👍Autofocus speed and accuracy are repeatedly praised, described as 'close to unimaginable' and 'the star of the show' for sports and wildlife.
   • 👍Image quality is lauded, with one user noting it surpasses the R5 and R5 II in sharpness, even when cropped.
   • 👎Firmware issues persist: focus point delays in viewfinder, camera freezes requiring power cycles, and overall reliability concerns after a year.
   • 👎Back-focus problems: camera switches to background patterns like nets and fences, causing missed shots, though better than 1DX III.
4. Q3 202588/1004.6★5 مراجعات

   Buyers praise the R1 for sports and wildlife photography, citing fast, accurate autofocus, comfortable ergonomics, and reliable build. One reviewer finds it overpriced unless pre-capture and 40fps are needed.

   • 👍Autofocus is fast, accurate, and sticky, ideal for sports and birds in motion.
   • 👍Ergonomics and grip are comfortable, especially for larger hands, no battery pack needed.
   • 👍Rugged build and reliability meet pro expectations, a solid upgrade from 1DX and R3.
   • 🤔Value debated: one says not worth price unless pre-capture and 40fps are essential, others see it as perfect for sports.
5. Q2 202595/1005.0★4 مراجعات

   Buyers in Q2 2025 praised the R1's autofocus, image quality, and electronic shutter, with one noting it paid for itself immediately. However, one reviewer criticized Canon's customer service and lack of local camera shops in Dallas/Fort Worth.

   • 👍Autofocus is exceptional, with one user noting improved performance on EF lenses like the 85/1.2 II.
   • 👍Image quality and electronic shutter are top-notch, reducing need for mechanical shutter.
   • 👍Camera exceeds expectations for high-volume shooting, with one calling it the best investment in 50 years.
   • 👎Canon's customer service is poor, and camera shops are scarce in the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
6. Q1 2025100/1005.0★3 مراجعات

   Buyers in Q1 2025 praised the Canon R1 as the best camera, highlighting its 24MP as sufficient, superior autofocus, pre-capture, 40fps, and dual CFexpress slots, calling it a worthy upgrade from the R3 and 1DX III.

   • 👍24MP resolution is sufficient for professional sports photography; critics are dismissed as uninformed.
   • 👍Upgrade from R3 and 1DX III is worthwhile, solving issues like dual CFexpress slots and adding better AF.
   • 👍Camera features like pre-capture, 40fps, and a larger EVF are praised as improvements.
   • 👍Overall, the R1 is considered the best camera, comparable to Sony A9 III but at a better value.
7. Q3 202425/1002.3★4 مراجعات

   Buyers in this period were split: one praised the R5 Mark II for wildlife and cropping, while three criticized the R1's 24MP resolution as too low, calling it a minor upgrade over the R3.

   • 👎Multiple reviewers disappointed with 24MP resolution, expecting higher megapixels (e.g., 45MP or more) for cropping.
   • 👎Camera seen as slight hardware bump over R3, not worth upgrade for resolution-focused buyers.
   • 👍R5 Mark II praised for capturing small wildlife and cropping, with excellent sports and portrait performance.

استنادًا إلى 31 مراجعة عملاء مؤرخة، مجمّعة حسب الربع التقويمي. تحليل الفترات باللغة الإنجليزية.