促销 7%

Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"

★★★☆☆ 3.3 (15)

搭载NQ8 AI Gen2处理器,通过256个AI神经网络实现8K AI升级,配合防眩光屏幕消除反射,呈现锐利无干扰的细节。超薄金属框架设计近乎无边框,70W 4.2.2声道音响系统支持物体追踪音效和杜比全景声,带来画面与声音精准同步的沉浸感。适合追求8K极致画质与4K 165Hz FreeSync Premium Pro无撕裂游戏体验的高端家庭影院玩家。

Screen 64.5
Resolution 8K
Panel QLED
Refresh 120 Hz
HDR HDR
hdmi version 2.0
Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65" tv
26 综合评分
价格 US$2,498
其他可用国家/地区:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Samsung QN900F now holds a disappointing 26 overall score, a massive 72-point drop from our earlier assessment. New leaders like the Sony A95L, LG G5, and TCL QM7K have completely reshaped the rankings. Unless you find this set at a clearance price and only care about reflection handling, there is no reason to buy it over the current top 5.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Stunning 8K upscaling with AI processing that makes everything look better. 100th
  • Glare-free screen handles bright rooms like a champ, even with windows nearby. 99th
  • Top-tier gaming features: 165Hz, VRR, ALLM, and FreeSync Premium Pro. 99th
  • Built-in 4.2.2-channel audio with Dolby Atmos sounds surprisingly full. 97th

Cons

  • Pricey, especially compared to excellent 4K OLEDs.
  • Outdoor performance is disappointing for a premium TV.
  • Native 8K content is still scarce, so you're mostly upscaling.
  • Picture quality lags slightly behind OLED rivals in dark scenes.

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.9/5 (477 reviews)
👍 Owners rave about the incredibly vibrant and detailed picture, even with non-8K content.
👍 The solar-powered remote is a frequent highlight—people love never buying batteries again.
👍 Audio quality from the built-in speakers gets a lot of praise, often eliminating the need for a soundbar.

用户口碑如何随时间变化

独家

依据客户实际撰写评价的时间——让你看到最初的好评是否持续。

用户口碑随时间不断改善
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '25: 2.0★ · 2 条评价Q1 '26: 3.0★ · 2 条评价22Q4 '25Q1 '26
平均评分满意(4-5★)不满意(1-2★)柱形高度 = 评价数量

基于 4 条带日期的客户评价,按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。

The proof

Performance

The display is a knockout, landing in the 99th percentile in our database. That means it's essentially the best screen we've tested this year. 8K AI upscaling is shockingly good—old 1080p shows look crisp and detailed, and native 8K content is a jaw-dropper. Gaming is a dream: you get 4K at 165Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro and VRR across all four HDMI 2.1 ports, making it a beast for PC and console. On the flip side, outdoor viewing is a letdown, scoring just 62.1—don't expect this to fight direct sunlight. And picture quality overall sits at the 79th percentile, which is strong but not best-in-class. OLEDs still beat it on pure black levels.

Performance Percentiles

Hdr 84.5
Audio 99
Smart 93.4
Gaming 88.2
Display 99
Connectivity 96.7
Social Proof 99.6
Picture Quality 78.8

Specifications

Full Specifications

Display

Size 65"
Resolution 8K
Panel Type MiniLED
Backlight Mini-LED
Aspect Ratio 16:9
Curved No

Picture Quality

Color Gamut Not Specified by Manufacturer
Motion Tech Motion Xcelerator 165Hz
Processor NQ8 AI Gen2 Processor

HDR

HDR Formats HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Dolby Vision No
HDR10+ Yes
HLG Yes

Gaming

Refresh Rate 120 Hz
VRR FreeSync Premium Pro, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
ALLM Yes
Game Mode Yes

Smart TV

Platform Tizen
Voice Assistant Amazon Alexa, Bixby
Screen Mirroring Apple AirPlay

Audio

Speaker Config 4.4.2
Wattage 70
Dolby Atmos Yes
Surround Sound Dolby Atmos
eARC Yes

Connectivity

HDMI Ports 4
HDMI Version 2.1
USB Ports 2
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.3
Ethernet Yes
Optical Audio Yes
VESA Mount 400x300

Power & Size

Power 316
Energy Star No
Annual Energy 587
Weight 25.6 kg / 56.4 lbs

vs Competition

The competitive field has shifted dramatically. The Samsung Neo QLED QN900F, Sony BRAVIA XR A95L, LG OLED evo AI G5, TCL QM7K, and Hisense U7 have all surged into the top 5, leaving the QN900F in the dust. The Sony and LG OLEDs demolish it on picture quality and black levels, while the TCL and Hisense offer shockingly good performance at budget-friendly prices. Even Samsung's own Neo QLED QN900F outclasses this model. The QN900F simply cannot compete with the current top-tier options.

Spec Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5" Sony BRAVIA XR XR77A95L LG G5 Series OLED55G5WUA TCL QM7K Series 75QM7K Hisense U7 Series 75U75QG Roku Plus Series 75R6C7
Screen Size 65 77 55 75 75 74.5
Resolution 7680x4320 3840x2160 3840x2160 3840x2160 4K 3840x2160
Panel Type MiniLED QD-OLED OLED QLED MiniLED QLED
Refresh Rate 120 120 120 144 165 60
Hdr HDR10, HDR10+, HLG HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG), Dolby Vision Dolby Vision, HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) Dolby Vision, HDR 10+, HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) Dolby Vision, HDR 10+, HDR 10, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) Dolby Vision, HDR 10+, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG)
Smart Platform Tizen Google TV webOS Google TV Google TV Roku TV
Dolby Vision false true true true true true
Dolby Atmos true true true true true true
Hdmi Version 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product HdrAudioSmartGamingDisplayConnectivitySocial ProofPicture Quality
Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 64.5" 84.59993.488.29996.799.678.8
Sony BRAVIA XR XR77A95L Compare 91.291.190.286.498.583.782.296.4
LG G5 Series OLED55G5WUA Compare 91.286.582.699.1909888.292.3
TCL QM7K Series 75QM7K Compare 91.290.197.593.488.489.188.297.2
Hisense U7 Series 75U75QG Compare 91.293.495.89536.596.794.698.5
Roku Plus Series 75R6C7 Compare 75.981.599.856.485.889.199.635.6

Price

Value & Pricing

With an overall score of 26, the QN900F is no longer a sensible buy at any price. The $2,200 to $2,798 range now looks absurd when sets like the TCL QM7K and Hisense U7 deliver far better performance for a fraction of the cost. Even if you find a steep discount, you're still paying a premium for 8K resolution on a TV that our testing now ranks among the worst in its class. There is no scenario where this represents good value anymore.

最低 US$2,200 4 家零售商共 5 个报价
Newegg 1 个报价 最低 US$2,200
Best Buy 1 个报价 最低 US$2,700
Amazon 2 个报价 最低 US$2,798
B&H Photo 1 个报价 最低 US$2,798

Price History

New Refurbished
US$2,000 US$2,200 US$2,400 US$2,600 US$2,800 US$3,000 5月13日5月20日5月28日6月24日 US$2,700

Read more

Overview

The Samsung QN900F is a 65-inch 8K MiniLED TV that goes all-in on future-proofing. Samsung packed it with AI upscaling, a glare-free screen, and a sleek metal frame that looks stunning on or off. It's the centerpiece TV for people who want their living room to make a statement.

But our latest data tells a very different story than our initial tests. The overall score has plummeted to 26, which puts this set near the bottom of our rankings. If you're considering this TV, you need to know what went wrong. The display still has its moments, but the value proposition has collapsed now that stronger competitors have entered the top 5.

Common Questions

Q: Does 8K really make a difference over 4K?

At 65 inches, the difference is subtle from normal seating, but the AI upscaling makes all content look sharper than a typical 4K TV.

Q: Can I use this for PC gaming at 4K 165Hz?

Yes, all four HDMI 2.1 ports support 4K at up to 165Hz with VRR, making it a fantastic large-format gaming monitor.

Q: Is the glare-free screen effective in a bright room?

It dramatically reduces reflections, but can't fully overcome direct sunlight—if you have an all-glass sunroom, blackout curtains are still your friend.

Who Should Skip This

If you mostly watch in a dark room and crave perfect black levels, skip this and grab an OLED like the LG G5. Outdoor enthusiasts with a patio setup should also steer clear—the QN900F's outdoor performance is one of its few letdowns.

Verdict

We can no longer recommend the QN900F. A score of 26 puts it firmly in "avoid" territory, especially when the new top 5 delivers better picture quality, smarter value, and more balanced performance. The 8K upscaling and anti-glare screen are not enough to rescue a TV that has fallen this far behind the competition.

Usage Scores

Overall (96.8)Budget (95.9)Gaming (86.2)Movies (83.9)Sports (95.5)Outdoor (66.6)Portable (63.1)Corporate (87)Streaming (97.3)Smart Home (97)

其他配置2

类似产品