TCL QM5K Series 65QM5K 64.5"
TCL
72 综合评分
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 55"
Samsung
80 综合评分
买家怎么说
TCL QM5K Series 65QM5K 64.5"
90 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
TCL QM5K 提供了令人印象深刻的画质和卓越的性价比，尤其是在促销时购买。用户称赞其深邃的黑色、鲜艳的色彩以及出乎意料的好内置音效。虽然 60Hz 刷新率对一些人来说是限制，但大多数人认为它足够用于流媒体和休闲游戏。一些用户注意到了与条形音箱的小故障和略微夸大的刷新率，但总体满意度很高。
优点
- 出色的画质
- 很高的性价比
- 深邃的黑色和鲜艳的色彩
- 出乎意料的好内置音效
- 重量轻，易于壁挂
缺点
- 60Hz 刷新率在某些用途上有限制
- 只有一个全带宽 HDMI 2.1 端口
- 一些条形音箱兼容性问题
- 刷新率略有夸大
- 需要调整画面设置
Picture quality 5
Value for money 4
Refresh rate 3
Built in sound quality 3
Hdmi ports 2
Soundbar compatibility 2
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 55"
72 满分 100 置信度高 223 条评价
三星 QN70F Neo QLED 电视总体上因其明亮鲜艳的画质、简单的设置和时尚的设计而受到称赞，许多用户强调其性价比和游戏性能。然而，相当多的评论对智能电视界面、遥控器的可用性以及偶尔的软件卡顿表示不满。更关键的是，有几位用户报告了过早的硬件故障，例如在几个月内出现坏点或完全失去图像，并描述了糟糕的客户支持体验，这降低了整体满意度。
优点
- 明亮鲜艳的画面
- 简单的设置过程
- 时尚纤薄的设计
- 物有所值
- 非常适合游戏
缺点
- 笨拙的智能电视界面
- 遥控器无背光
- 偶尔的软件卡顿
- 过早的硬件故障
- 糟糕的客户支持
Picture quality 45
Smart tv interface 12
Remote control 10
Build quality 8
Customer support 5
Value for money 15
评分
Smart Home
Streaming
Budget
Sports
Gaming
Corporate
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
规格
| TCL QM5K Series 65QM5K 64.5" | Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 55" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 64.5" | 55" |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel Type | Mini-LED | Mini-LED |
| Backlight | Full-Array LED | Mini-LED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Color Gamut | — | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Motion Tech | Motion Rate 240 | Motion Xcelerator 144Hz |
| Processor | TCL AIPQ Processor | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, Dolby Vision | HDR10+ |
| Dolby Vision | ✓★ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HLG | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| VRR | VRR | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| ALLM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Game Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Google TV | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa | Amazon Alexa, Bixby |
| Screen Mirroring | Apple AirPlay 2 | SmartThings |
| Works With | Google Home, Amazon Alexa, Apple Home | Google Home, SmartThings |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Wattage | — | 20W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surround Sound | DTS Virtual:X | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 3 | 4★ |
| HDMI Version | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| USB Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.2 |
| Ethernet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optical Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 300x300 | 200x200 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | 650W | 126W★ |
| Energy Star | ✗ | ✗ |
| Annual Energy | 650 kWh | 240 kWh★ |
| Weight | 16.96 kg | 14.20 kg★ |
优缺点
TCL QM5K Series 65QM5K 64.5"
- Strong smart (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong hdr (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 55"
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong smart (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong gaming (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
价格
TCL QM5K Series 65QM5K 64.5"0.084每美元得分
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 55"0.120每美元得分
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 55" 性价比高 1.4 倍
结论
胜出: Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 55"
Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 38 specs.
