LG OLED evo C3 OLED65C3PUA 65"
LG
73 综合评分
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
Samsung
98 综合评分
买家怎么说
LG OLED evo C3 OLED65C3PUA 65"
85 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
LG 65英寸C3 OLED evo因其卓越的画质而备受赞誉，具有深邃的黑色、鲜艳的色彩和令人印象深刻的对比度。游戏玩家欣赏120Hz刷新率、HDMI 2.1和VRR支持带来的流畅游戏体验。然而，用户也指出一些缺点，如屏幕反光严重、内置音质一般、缺少ATSC 3.0调谐器以及界面中存在一些广告。总体而言，这是一款顶级的OLED电视，为电影和游戏提供卓越的视觉性能。
优点
- 深邃黑色与无限对比度
- 生动准确的色彩
- 120Hz刷新率适合游戏
- 支持VRR和G-Sync的HDMI 2.1
- AI处理器带来出色画质提升
缺点
- 屏幕反光严重
- 内置音质一般
- 缺少ATSC 3.0调谐器
- webOS界面中的广告
- 需要手动调整颜色
Picture quality 5
Gaming performance 3
Build quality 3
Screen reflectivity 2
Sound quality 4
Smart platform ads 2
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
88 满分 100 置信度中 16 条评价
总体而言，用户对这款电视非常满意，称赞其出色的亮度、鲜艳的色彩和清晰的画质。许多人强调其在游戏和电影中的沉浸式体验，部分人注意到令人印象深刻的音场和响应灵敏的界面。一些小的批评包括缺乏8K内容和希望遥控器有更多选项，但这并不影响压倒性的积极情绪。
优点
- 出色的亮度
- 鲜艳的色彩
- 清晰的画质
- 沉浸式音场
- 响应灵敏的界面
缺点
- 缺乏8K内容
- 遥控器选项有限
- 界面需要改进
Brightness 8
Color quality 7
Picture quality 6
Sound quality 5
Gaming experience 3
Ui responsiveness 3
评分
Smart Home
Streaming
Budget
Sports
Corporate
Gaming
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
规格
| LG OLED evo C3 OLED65C3PUA 65" | Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 65" | 75" |
| Resolution | 4K | 8K★ |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | Mini-LED |
| Backlight | OLED★ | Mini-LED |
| Aspect Ratio | — | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Screen Finish | — | matte |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Contrast Ratio | Infinite | infinite |
| Color Gamut | — | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| Motion Tech | None | Motion Xcelerator 240 Hz |
| Processor | α9 AI Processor Gen6 | NQ8 AI Gen3 Processor |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| Dolby Vision | ✓★ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✗ | ✓★ |
| HLG | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.10000000149011612 ms★ | — |
| VRR | NVIDIA G-Sync, AMD FreeSync Premium, VRR | FreeSync Premium Pro, VRR |
| ALLM | — | ✓★ |
| Game Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | webOS | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Amazon Alexa | Amazon Alexa, Bixby |
| Screen Mirroring | Apple AirPlay 2 | Apple AirPlay |
| Works With | Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Apple Home | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | 2.2 | 6.2.4 |
| Wattage | — | 90W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surround Sound | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 4 | 5★ |
| HDMI Version | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| USB Ports | 3 | 4★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optical Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 300x200 | 400x300 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 327W★ |
| Energy Star | ✗ | ✗ |
| Annual Energy | 213 kWh★ | 607 kWh |
| Weight | 16.60 kg★ | 30.80 kg |
优缺点
LG OLED evo C3 OLED65C3PUA 65"
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong gaming (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong smart (90th percentile)90th %ile
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong audio (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong display (100th percentile)100th %ile
价格
LG OLED evo C3 OLED65C3PUA 65"0.055每美元得分
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"0.036每美元得分
LG OLED evo C3 OLED65C3PUA 65" 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 42 specs.
