Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"
Samsung
53 综合评分
vs
Roku Pro Series 55R8C5 55"
Roku
81 综合评分
买家怎么说
Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"
78 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
这款三星电视因其惊人的画质、沉浸式观看体验和简单的设置而获得了压倒性的积极反馈。用户称赞其鲜艳的色彩、清晰的细节和出人意料的好内置音效。然而，一位经过验证的买家报告了屏幕缺陷和糟糕的送货体验，另一位用户则指出应用程序可用性有限。总体而言，大多数客户非常满意并会推荐这款电视。
优点
- 惊人的画质
- 沉浸式观看体验
- 简单设置
- 良好的内置音效
- 鲜艳的色彩
缺点
- 报告屏幕缺陷
- 糟糕的送货体验
- 应用程序可用性有限
- 设置可能需要反复尝试
Picture quality 7
Sound quality 4
Setup ease 5
Delivery experience 2
App availability 1
Screen defect 1
Roku Pro Series 55R8C5 55"
92 满分 100 置信度中 26 条评价
Roku Pro系列电视因其卓越的画质、鲜艳的色彩和深邃的黑色而获得压倒性的正面反馈。用户称赞内置音响，通常认为其足够好而无需回音壁，并强调响应迅速且用户友好的Roku界面。可充电、带背光且具有定位功能的遥控器是一个便捷的亮点。一些小的批评包括反光的亮面屏幕、无法自定义的快捷按钮，以及偶尔出现的初始问题（如局部调光瑕疵，但很快得到解决）。
优点
- 卓越的画质，色彩鲜艳
- 深邃的黑色和出色的对比度
- 出色的内置音响，通常无需回音壁
- 响应迅速且快速的Roku界面
- 可充电背光遥控器，带定位功能
缺点
- 亮面屏幕导致反光
- 遥控器上的快捷按钮无法自定义
- 初始局部调光瑕疵（已快速解决）
- 比预期重
- 低音有时不足
Picture quality 10
Sound quality 9
Ease of use 8
Remote control 7
Value for money 6
Gaming performance 3
评分
Smart Home
Budget
Streaming
Gaming
Sports
Corporate
Movies
Portable
Outdoor
规格
| Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75" | Roku Pro Series 55R8C5 55" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 75" | 55" |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel Type | QD-Mini-LED★ | QLED |
| Backlight | Mini-LED★ | Full-Array LED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Contrast Ratio | — | infinite |
| Motion Tech | VRR gaming at up to 4K 144Hz | Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) |
| Processor | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor | Roku Smart Picture Max |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | Neo Quantum HDR | Dolby Vision, HDR 10+, Hybrid Log-Gamma (HLG) |
| Dolby Vision | ✗ | ✓★ |
| HDR10+ | ✗ | ✓★ |
| HLG | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| VRR | VRR | FreeSync Premium Pro, VRR |
| ALLM | — | ✓★ |
| Game Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Tizen | Roku TV |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa | Not Applicable, Not Applicable |
| Screen Mirroring | — | Apple AirPlay 2, Miracast |
| Works With | — | Apple Home, Amazon Alexa, Google Home |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | 2.0 | 4 |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surround Sound | — | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Audio |
| eARC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 4★ |
| HDMI Version | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6★ |
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2★ |
| Ethernet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optical Audio | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 200x200 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 235W★ |
| Energy Star | — | ✗ |
| Annual Energy | — | 238 kWh★ |
| Weight | 33.52 kg | 18.55 kg★ |
优缺点
Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"
- Strong picture quality (79th percentile)
- Strong gaming (73rd percentile)
- Strong audio (70th percentile)
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
Roku Pro Series 55R8C5 55"
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong gaming (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
价格
Samsung Neo QLED QN75QN80FAFXZA 75"0.035每美元得分
vs
Roku Pro Series 55R8C5 55"0.125每美元得分
Roku Pro Series 55R8C5 55" 性价比高 3.6 倍
结论
胜出: Roku Pro Series 55R8C5 55"
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 12 of 37 specs.
