Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" 25040RP0AL Gray + Case Cover 2025
Xiaomi
69 综合评分
vs
Winsing Android Tablet 10 inch Gray Blue
Winsing
50 综合评分
买家怎么说
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" 25040RP0AL Gray + Case Cover 2025
85 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
小米Redmi Pad 2因其优质的金属机身、流畅的性能和约225美元的出色性价比而广受好评。用户强调其速度快、电池续航好、音质出色，但有些人指出屏幕在户外使用不够亮，充电速度慢（18W）。还有用户提到4GB RAM版本在运行多个应用时可能会卡顿，触控笔价格昂贵且功能有限。
优点
- 优质金属机身
- 流畅性能
- 出色的性价比
- 电池续航好
- 音质出色
缺点
- 18W充电速度慢
- 屏幕在户外不够亮
- 4GB RAM版本可能卡顿
- 触控笔昂贵且功能有限
- 无红外发射器
Build quality 5
Performance 7
Value for money 6
Battery life 4
Charging speed 3
Screen brightness 3
Winsing Android Tablet 10 inch Gray Blue
暂无用户反馈
评分
Reading
Entertainment
Student
Business
Art Design
Productivity
规格
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" 25040RP0AL | Winsing Android Tablet 10 inch | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2.2 GHz mediatek_helio | — |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB★ |
| Storage | 256 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC★ | — |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11" | 10" |
| Resolution | 2560 px★ | — |
| Panel | LCD | IPS★ |
| Refresh Rate | 90 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 500 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.32 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
优缺点
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" 25040RP0AL Gray + Case Cover 2025
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong cpu (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong gpu (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong battery (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average feature (31st percentile)
Winsing Android Tablet 10 inch Gray Blue
- Strong cpu (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong ram (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong gpu (79th percentile)
- Below average battery (30th percentile)
- Below average feature (31st percentile)
价格
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" 25040RP0AL Gray + Case Cover 20250.305每美元得分
vs
Winsing Android Tablet 10 inch Gray Blue0.626每美元得分
Winsing Android Tablet 10 inch Gray Blue 性价比高 2.1 倍
结论
胜出: Xiaomi Redmi Pad 11" 25040RP0AL
Scores 69 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.
