Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 11" Gray 2025
Samsung
77 综合评分
vs
Lenovo Tab M9 9 Arctic Grey
Lenovo
34 综合评分
买家怎么说
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 11" Gray 2025
82 满分 100 置信度高 95 条评价
三星Galaxy Tab S11因其鲜艳的显示屏、快速的性能以及与三星手机的无缝集成而广受好评。用户欣赏附带的S Pen和AI功能，但有些人指出触控笔的磁铁较弱且笔尖易碎。电池续航评价不一，有些用户需要每天充电，而另一些用户则能坚持一周。少数抱怨涉及预装软件和缺少耳机插孔。
优点
- 鲜艳的OLED显示屏
- 快速性能
- 与三星手机无缝集成
- 附带的S Pen具有AI功能
- 良好的构建质量
缺点
- S Pen磁铁较弱
- S Pen笔尖易碎
- 预装软件和后台应用
- 没有耳机插孔
- 电池续航参差不齐
Display quality 15
Performance speed 12
S pen functionality 10
Battery life 8
Bloatware 3
Build quality 6
Lenovo Tab M9 9 Arctic Grey
暂无用户反馈
评分
Art Design
Entertainment
Reading
Student
Productivity
Business
规格
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 11" | Lenovo Tab M9 9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | — |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 3 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB★ | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | SSD★ | — |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11" | 9" |
| Resolution | 2560 px★ | — |
| Panel | AMOLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 162 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stylus Model | S Pen | — |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Face Unlock | ✓ | ✓ |
| IP Rating | IP68 | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.48 kg | 0.34 kg★ |
| OS | Android | Android 12 |
优缺点
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 11" Gray 2025
- Strong cpu (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong gpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
Lenovo Tab M9 9 Arctic Grey
- Strong cpu (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong gpu (79th percentile)
- Below average storage (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average ram (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
价格
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 11" Gray 20250.099每美元得分
vs
Lenovo Tab M9 9 Arctic Grey0.152每美元得分
Lenovo Tab M9 9 Arctic Grey 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 11"
Scores 77 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.
