Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Samsung
73 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉，5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度，非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而，一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容，建议检查系统要求。
优点
- 5年质保
- 包含救援服务
- 高耐久性（5,050TBW）
- 快速顺序读写
- 支持DirectStorage
缺点
- 兼容性不保证
- 可能不适合所有电脑
Durability 1
Warranty 1
Performance 1
Compatibility 1
Directstorage support 1
评分
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Workstation
Budget
Portable
规格
| Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Seagate FireCuda 530R | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 4★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | MLC★ | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Controller | Samsung Phoenix | E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 1 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong random (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong endurance (74th percentile)
- Below average affordability (34th percentile)
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
价格
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.245每美元得分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.102每美元得分
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 2.4 倍
结论
胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R
Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.
