Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Western Digital
93 综合评分
vs
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
97 综合评分
买家怎么说
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
92 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
用户对这款金士顿KC3000固态硬盘的评价非常积极，称赞其极快的速度，尤其是在游戏和作为启动盘方面。许多人指出它超越或媲美三星990 Pro和西数SN850X等竞品，而且价格往往更优。少数人提到一些小设置问题，比如在新Windows系统上需要下载驱动程序或扇区大小差异，但这些都很容易解决，不影响整体满意度。
优点
- 速度极快
- 性价比高
- 超越竞品
- 非常适合游戏
- 性能可靠
缺点
- 新Windows系统需要下载驱动
- 克隆时扇区大小不匹配
- 4TB版本价格较高
Speed 8
Value for money 5
Gaming performance 4
Ease of setup 3
Reliability 3
Competitor comparison 4
评分
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 | Kingston KC3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓ | ✓ |
| Controller | — | Phison E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong random (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong endurance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
价格
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.118每美元得分
vs
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.249每美元得分
Kingston KC3000 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 2.1 倍
结论
胜出: Kingston KC3000
Scores 97 overall, wins 2 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 18 specs.
