Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
98 综合评分
vs
Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"
Lexar
35 综合评分
买家怎么说
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"
72 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
大多数用户对这款128GB固态硬盘非常满意，称赞其性价比，尤其是用于升级旧系统。一位买家收到了未通过诊断的故障产品，但其他人认为它是隐藏的宝石。总体而言，推荐用于预算有限的升级。
优点
- 性价比高
- 旧系统运行快
- 旧电脑升级容易
- 用户推荐
缺点
- 有故障风险
- 一台诊断失败
Value for money 3
Performance 2
Reliability 2
Ease of installation 1
Recommendation 2
评分
Laptop
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Budget
Portable
规格
| Kingston SSD | Lexar NS100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | 2.5" |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 | SATA III |
| Protocol | NVMe | SATA |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | — |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 无数据 | |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | MLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | ✓★ | — |
| Controller | SM2508 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | — |
优缺点
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"
- Strong affordability (79th percentile)
- Strong endurance (74th percentile)
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average random (22nd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
价格
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 22800.086每美元得分
vs
Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"0.575每美元得分
Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5" 性价比高 6.7 倍
结论
胜出: Kingston SSD
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 16 specs.
