S SHARKSPEED 719244598692 256GB SATA III M.2 2242

S SHARKSPEED 719244598692 256GB SATA III M.2 2242

S SHARKSPEED
36 综合评分
vs
Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung
99 综合评分

评分

Gaming
S SHARKSPEED
22
Samsung
100
Console
S SHARKSPEED
11
Samsung
100
Workstation
S SHARKSPEED
35
Samsung
99
Laptop
S SHARKSPEED
38
Samsung
86
Budget
S SHARKSPEED
75
Samsung
83
Portable
S SHARKSPEED
8
Samsung
27

规格

S SHARKSPEED 719244598692Samsung 9100 PRO
Drive
Capacity
256
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2242M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—5★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
550
14,800
Sequential Write (MB/s)
500
13,400
Random Read (IOPS)无数据
2,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)无数据
2,600,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✓★
Controller—In-House Controller
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)无数据
2,400
MTBF (hours)无数据
1,500,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✗✓★
Hardware Encryption—✓★

优缺点

S SHARKSPEED 719244598692 256GB SATA III M.2 2242

  • Strong affordability (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (28th percentile)

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average affordability (5th percentile)5th %ile

价格

S SHARKSPEED 719244598692 256GB SATA III M.2 2242 is US$783 cheaper (12.9x less).

S SHARKSPEED 719244598692 256GB SATA III M.2 22420.544每美元得分
vs
Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.117每美元得分

S SHARKSPEED 719244598692 256GB SATA III M.2 2242 性价比高 4.6 倍

S SHARKSPEED 719244598692 256GB SATA III M.2 2242

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

结论

★ 胜出: Samsung 9100 PRO

Scores 99 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

Samsung 9100 PRO 更擅长:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

也值得考虑