Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Crucial
87 综合评分
vs
Samsung 2TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2
Samsung
96 综合评分
买家怎么说
Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
82 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
Crucial T700 Gen5 NVMe SSD 因其惊人的顺序读写速度（通常超过规格）和有效的散热器设计而广受赞誉。然而，用户指出，与 Gen4 相比，随机性能的提升微乎其微，而且大型散热器可能会使安装复杂化并限制扩展选项。总体而言，对于追求极致性能的用户来说，这是一款顶级选择，但需要仔细考虑空间和气流。
优点
- 惊人的顺序读写速度
- 有效的散热器设计
- 超过宣传速度
- 坚固的制造质量
- 性能价格比高
缺点
- 散热器尺寸大
- 随机性能提升微乎其微
- 安装复杂
- 限制扩展选项
- 需要足够的气流
Sequential speed 6
Heatsink design 5
Random performance 3
Installation difficulty 4
Value for money 2
Build quality 2
Samsung 2TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2
暂无用户反馈
评分
Gaming
Workstation
Console
Budget
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Crucial T700 | Samsung 2TB SSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5 | 5 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓ | ✓ |
| Controller | Phison E26 | In-House Controller |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong speed (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong endurance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
Samsung 2TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2
- Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average affordability (18th percentile)18th %ile
价格
Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.456每美元得分
vs
Samsung 2TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.20.239每美元得分
Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 1.9 倍
结论
胜出: Samsung 2TB SSD
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.
