Western Digital WD Black SN850X
Western Digital
99 综合评分
vs
Samsung 870 EVO
Samsung
49 综合评分
买家怎么说
Western Digital WD Black SN850X
92 满分 100 置信度中 17 条评价
WD Black SN850X 因其极快的速度、可靠性和出色的性价比而备受赞誉，经常被拿来与三星和 Solidigm 等更昂贵的替代品进行有利比较。用户报告在游戏（尤其是 PS5）和一般使用中表现出色，但也有一些对潜在问题的担忧，这些问题可通过固件更新来缓解。总体而言，它被视为顶级 NVMe 固态硬盘，尤其是在促销时。
优点
- 极快的速度
- 出色的性价比
- 可靠的大容量存储
- 非常适合 PS5
- 安装简单
缺点
- 潜在的固件问题
- 不含散热器
- 不打折时较贵
Speed 6
Value for money 4
Reliability 4
Ps5 compatibility 3
Firmware concerns 2
Installation 2
Samsung 870 EVO
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
用户对这款SSD非常满意，称赞其性能、性价比以及对旧系统的适用性。已验证评论强调价格实惠、发货迅速，问答部分确认了兼容性和RAID支持。总体而言，是升级的可靠选择。
优点
- 性价比极佳
- 发货迅速
- 与旧系统兼容良好
- 性能良好
- 支持RAID配置
缺点
- 样本量有限
- 未提及负面反馈
Performance 2
Value for money 2
Compatibility 2
Shipping speed 1
Raid support 1
评分
Budget
Console
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Western Digital WD Black SN850X | Samsung 870 EVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | 2.5" |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | SATA III |
| Protocol | NVMe | SATA |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓ | ✓ |
| Controller | — | MKX |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Western Digital WD Black SN850X
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong random (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
Samsung 870 EVO
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong endurance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (65th percentile)
- Below average random (22nd percentile)
- Below average capacity (26th percentile)
价格
Western Digital WD Black SN850X0.152每美元得分
vs
Samsung 870 EVO0.204每美元得分
Samsung 870 EVO 性价比高 1.3 倍
结论
胜出: Western Digital WD Black SN850X
Scores 99 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.
